|
|
Recent articles:
- The UN Department of Disinformation, in the Days of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, will not tackle any of the Five Veto Wielding Powers. Under a very distant Japanese Under-Secretary-General the Media was entrusted to China and France – so pesky media should not expect disclosures of real value. Inside information sustains above allegation. (August 21st, 2010)
- For those in the saddle – life goes on in Pakistan. (August 21st, 2010)
- BREAKING NEWS FOR THE GREEN WORLD: 350.org has joined Al Gore, the Alliance for Climate Protection and Surfrider in supporting Dot Eco LLC’s application to create a new “.eco” top level internet domain. (August 21st, 2010)
- In front of house number 530, the East 84th Neighborhood Association of Manhattan – a year after the fact – had planted a single tree and a metal plaque in memory of 9/11/01. It is important for Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, in his trip to the Gulf States, and for his hosts in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE, to go and see that tree in order to get a glimpse of what is possible if attempting true healing. We suggest they also consider the impact on the sluggish help to Pakistan. (August 21st, 2010)
- The U.S.-Brazil Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) – or the Security Pact between the Western Hemisphere two dominant powers – is an anti-drugs but also a hemispheric security pact. (August 21st, 2010)
- In New Hampshire’s Pease International Tradeport we visited August 11, 2010 the Global Relief Technologies Corporation and then I found in my mail a UN communication “NEW UN ONLINE TOOL DETECTS GLOBAL FIRE HOTSPOTS IN REAL TIME.” I decided to combine the items because of the common reliance on communication high tech. (August 20th, 2010)
- The flooding of Pakistan started July 29th and the US started to help beginning of August but the truth is that not many others joined in with help. Haiti had seemingly much higher appeal. (August 20th, 2010)
- The State of New Hampshire is encouraging foreign investment in its effort to continue avoiding the need to tax its citizens. Amazingly – they manage to pay next to nothing their legislators! (August 20th, 2010)
- The Canadian International Council agrees that the Copenhagen Accord has in it enough to start on a road to develop on a country level response to climate change. (August 20th, 2010)
- Eight pilot countries in the Caribbean – Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, Dominica, Jamaica, and St. Lucia – have been studied for a Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility, Enhancing the climate risk and adaptation fact base for the Caribbean. How does it reflect on Pakistan’s problems. (August 20th, 2010)
- The conference ‘Deltas in Times of Climate Change’ 29 September 29 – October 1, 2010 in Rotterdam. (August 20th, 2010)
- Chongqing – the biggest city you might not have heard off – it is Chicago on the Yangtze. (August 20th, 2010)
- The official US extended helping hand to flood stricken Pakistan. (August 20th, 2010)
- Pakistan – the day after the UN pledging session. (August 20th, 2010)
- August 19, 2010, before the UN started its meetings, the Asia Society in New York opened the discussion on the Pakistan Flood response by diving right to the bottom truth – the latest mega-disasters have one common cause – human induced climate change. It was Financier George Soros who injected the topic and the media was allowed by Ambassador Holbrooke to follow up. See what you can do when you go outside the UN! (August 20th, 2010)
- http://www.Qwanz.com/nymosque Tanya from Qwanz.com gives an update on what is happening on the Park 51 (Ground Zero Mosque/ Cordoba House) issue. (August 20th, 2010)
- While hearing the UN General Assembly pledges of help needed by Pakistan, to our attention came that starting September 1, 2010, the experienced John Holmes will be replaced by an unexperienced Coordinator of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) – Dame Valerie Amos, and the UNelections Monitor has misgivings about Mr. Ban Ki-moon’s motives for his appointments. (August 19th, 2010)
- August 19, 2003 – The explosion in Baghdad that killed UN envoy, Sérgio Vieira de Mello, and three American civilians was chosen to be commemorated as World Humanitarian Day. It is appropriate to review the day in the light of unfolding Humanitarian activities in flood stricken Pakistan. (August 19th, 2010)
- The Climate Himalaya Initiative http://www.climatehimalaya.net has a dedicated news portal http://chimalaya.org/ , with updates on regular basis from Himalayan Mountains. (August 19th, 2010)
- Collaborate on Water, Himalayan Scientists Urge in “Third Pole” Report. (August 19th, 2010)
|
 |
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 21st, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
Only extremely few journalists were left at the UN who really care to investigate the facts. The UN likes those that do not look under the rug – so they do not like us at all. Clearly, this makes our work harder, but we can still get information – and believe us – the stench comes through the UN gates. Let us see:
As UN Denies Offer to Mediate for Cambodia, Dodges on Roma, Selective Answers.
By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, August 20 — How does the UN choose which questions to answer, and to which publications? How should journalists know when to ask question about topics on which the UN rarely comments, like Guantanamo Bay, Chechnya, Tibet, Kashmir and many other Asian conflicts?
A week after Inner City Press asked the Spokesperson for Ban Ki-moon if he had received a letter from Cambodia asking Ban to mediate the country’s border dispute with Thailand, Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq sent a response to another publication, then called its reporting inaccurate.
On August 12, Inner City Press asked
Inner City Press: Cambodia now says that they’ve sent a letter to the Secretary-General and the Security Council. I don’t know if it’s been received. And a Cambodian, the Prime Minister, has said that he’ll be asking the Secretary-General personally to somehow coordinate this border dispute that they’ve had for some time but that seems to be heating up, with Thailand saying that they’re going to fortify their border. Is it something that DPA [Department of Political Affairs] is watching? Have you gotten the letter and would the Secretary-General be willing to mediate?
Spokesperson Martin Nesirky: We’ve seen the reports. We have not received any request. And if requests are received, not just in this case, but in any case, from parties to a dispute or conflict, asking for mediation, then, obviously, the United Nations, the Secretary-General would look at that. But we have not received a request from one or either or both.
This was the last Inner City Press heard from the UN. Then on August 20 a publication in the region reported that “The deputy spokesperson for UN Secretary General, Farhan Haq, replied to an email from the Cambodian press on August 18 saying that, ‘The Secretary-General is willing to mediate situation when both sides request him to do so.’”
Inner City Press asked Haq about the statement, including why it was not sent out more broadly, including to Inner City Press which had asked the question. Video here, from Minute 15:10.
Haq first said that the report that Ban was “willing to mediate” was inaccurate. Haq said that all he sent out was that Ban “stands ready to help.” But where then did the press in the region get the quote?
How are journalists at the UN to guarantee that they receive the UN’s responses to questions they have previously asked, or have NOT asked because of the UN’s historic unwillingness to comment on the problems of the Permanent Five Security Council members, any one of which could veto a second term by Ban Ki-moon, such as Chechnya, Guantanamo Bay, Tibet or, as Inner City Press asked earlier in the briefing, France’s expulsion of the Roma to Romania. Video here, from Minute 13:51.
Haq said the UN is monitoring it and if it has anything to say, we’ll know.
—- {and regarding France and the Roma} —-
In front of the General Assembly on August 20, Inner City Press asked the French charge d’affairesl’affaire Roma, and was met with blank stares. Let us know if there is a meeting on that, was the answer. and a French spokesman about But there are rarely meetings at the UN on controversial acts by Permanent Five members of the Security Council.
They can block them in the Council, and the S-G- and his spokespeople don’t seem to like to ruffle P-5 feathers, with a second term on the line….

UN’s Ban cozy with Sarkozy, comment on expelled Roma not shown
If you ask, we try, Haq said more generally.
But what if you don’t ask because the UN never comments? How can a reporter go on record as wanting statements about peace and security, without going down the line of all possible questions?
Someday it does feel like you go down the line, Haq said. And still we try.
—-{then on India!} —
But why send out responses selectively, like Haq sent his Kashmir response to other three journalists, and gave the UN’s answer on the death of DSS staffer Louis Maxwell to a publication in Germany and not to Inner City Press, which had been asking about the case in the noon briefing in New York every day for a week? This, Haq did not answer.
* * *
UN’s Kashmir Email was Drafted by DPA from its “Morning Prayers,” Watered Down by Nambiar, Blamed on Haq.
By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, August 5 — When the UN made a statement on Kashmir, then stepped away from it and blamed it on an Associate Spokesman, there was more than met the eye. Inner City Press has inquired and finds the following: the initial response on the violence in Kashmir was produced by the UN Department of Political Affairs, in what is called its “morning prayers” meeting, chaired by DPA chief Lynn Pascoe.
Then, even before the statement was released, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s chief of staff Vijay Nambiar, a former Indian diplomat and intelligence operative, edited the statement, “watering it down” as one senior UN official puts it.
After UN Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq emailed the statement to four journalists and it was published, the Indian Mission to the UN protested. They came to meet with the UN, Mr. Nambiar, for more than two hours. Apparently, Nambiar did not fully disclose his initial role in editing the statement.
Next, the UN Spokesman Martin Nesirky stepped away from the statement, emphasizing that Ban Ki-moon never said it, and it was mere “guidance from the Secretariat,” and claiming that it had been misinterpreted. How?

UN’s Nambiar and Pascoe, Kashmir statement and morning prayers not shown.
On August 4, Inner City Press asked Nesirky to think it through: if he could walk away from this statement attributable to the Office of the Spokesman for the Secretary General, how can any of his future statements be taken seriously? I have said all I am going to say, Nesirky replied. Okay…
Footnote: attendees that DPA’s “morning prayers” quote Pascoe, for example that “Hillary Clinton is going to Colombia, what does she think she can accomplish?” While some attendees conclude from this that Pascoe is aligned with US Republicans who appointed him, others say it establishes his “street cred” as an international civil servants. But is this what HRC and Obama want?
—
From the UN’s August 3 noon briefing transcript:
Inner City Press: a controversy has arisen around a statement that Farhan Haq had put out, talking about Indian-occupied Kashmir and calling for restraint. And, basically, it says that the Indian Foreign Ministry or Ministry of External Affairs has taken issues with it, that your Office has clarified that the Secretary-General never made those comments. Have you seen that story, and what can you do to clarify the seeming discrepancy between the Indian Foreign Ministry and your Office?
Spokesperson Nesirky: The Spokesperson’s Office released to the media guidance which was prepared by the UN Secretariat, and that seems to have been taken out of context. This was not a statement of the Secretary-General.
Question: What was taken out of context? This was a formal statement.
Spokesperson: Let me repeat what I just said: the Spokesperson’s Office released to the media guidance which was prepared by the UN Secretariat, and it seems to have been taken out of context. This was not a statement of the Secretary-General. That’s what I have; I don’t have anything to add.
Question: But the statement said the Secretary-General calls for restraint, and is there concern about it?
Spokesperson: As I said, I don’t have anything to add to what I’ve just said.
–
From the UN’s August 4 noon briefing transcript:
Inner City Press: Some think that the way that it was answered yesterday — it’s hard for them to take; what weight should statements by the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General be given if they’re later characterized as mere guidance and the Secretary-General didn’t mean them. For your own purposes, how do we — is this a one-off, or does this somehow change; you get a statement today about Tanzania — is that a statement of the Secretary-General, or is it mere guidance, and from who — who gave the guidance on Kashmir?
Spokesperson Nesirky: You know very well what it said [on Tanzania]: it said “a statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General”, and that clearly is a statement. But I don’t have anything beyond what I’ve already said on this topic. Okay?
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in France, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 21st, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
Pakistani TV Drama – Tanhaiyan 37 of 45 – http://bit.ly/a78CQC
ramlahkhan says:
I can’t understand the whole thing, but it’s something like, “Respected lady, with your sudden and unexpected illness, we feel very sad and the whole world seems colorless. We request that you get well soon so we are delighted and thankful for your well being.
lol.. it was real good urdu
=============================
then there is the following:
http://geoblog.in/usa-and-innocent-peopl…
picked up via a well camouflaged blogger - http://twitter.com/account/profile_image…
USA AND INNOCENT PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN.
Drone War (Pakistan History)
The United States government has made a series of attacks on targets in Pakistan since 2004 using drones (unmanned aerial vehicles). Under the George W. Bush administration, these controversial attacks were called a part of the US’ “War on Terrorism” and sought to defeat the Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants who were thought to have found a safe haven in Pakistan. Most of these attacks are on targets in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas in Northwest Pakistan. These strikes are thought to be carried out by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operated remotely by the Central Intelligence Agency and have continued under the Presidency of Barack Obama. Generally the UAVs used are MQ-1 Predator and more recently MQ-9 Reaper firing AGM-114 Hellfire missiles. The drones have become a weapon of choice for the United States in the fight against al-Qaeda. Some media refer to the series of attacks as a “drone war”.
US viewpoint
Barack Obama authorized the continuation of these strikes after he became US president. Top US officials consider these strikes very successful and believe that the senior al-Qaeda leadership has been decimated by these strikes. A list of the high-ranking victims of the drones was provided to Pakistan in 2009. Obama has broadened these attacks to include targets seeking to destabilize Pakistani civilian government and the attacks of February 14 and 16, 2009 were against training camps run by Baitullah Mehsud. On February 25, 2009 Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, has indicated the strikes will continue. On March 4, 2009 The Washington Times reported that the drones were targeting Baitullah Mehsud. Obama was reported in March 2009 as considering expanding these strikes to include Balochistan
US officials stated in March 2009 that the Predator strikes had killed nine of al-Qaeda’s 20 top commanders. The officials added that many top Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders, as a result of the strikes, had fled to Quetta or even further to Karachi.
Some US politicians have condemned the drone strikes. US Congressman Dennis Kucinich asserted that the United States was violating international law by carrying out strikes against a country that never attacked the United States.
US military reports asserted that al-Qaeda is being slowly but systematically routed because of these attacks, and that they have served to sow the seeds of uncertainty and discord among their ranks. They also claimed that the drone attacks have addled and confused the Taliban, and have led them to turn against each other.
During a protest against drone attacks, in an event sponsored by Nevada Desert Experience, Father Louie Vitale, Kathy Kelly, Stephen Kelly, SJ, Eve Tetaz, John Dear, and others were arrested outside Creech Air Force Base on Wednesday April 9, 2009.
In May 2009 it was reported that the USA was sharing drone intelligence with Pakistan. Leon Panetta reiterated on May 19, 2009 that the US intended to continue the Drone attacks.
On July 20, 2009, the Brookings Institution released a report stating that ten civilians died in the drone attacks for every militant killed. It suggested the real answer to halting al-Qaeda’s activity in Pakistan will be long-term support of Pakistan’s counterinsurgency efforts. In July 2009 it was reported that (according to US officials) Osama Bin Laden’s son Saad bin Laden was believed to have been killed in a drone attack earlier in the year.
Pakistani response
Pakistan has repeatedly protested these attacks as they are an infringement of its sovereignty and because civilian deaths have also resulted, including women and children, which has further angered the Pakistani government and people. General David Petraeus was told in November 2008 that these strikes were unhelpful. However on October 4, 2008 The Washington Post reported that there was a secret deal between the US and Pakistan allowing these drone attacks. US senator Dianne Feinstein said in February 2009: “As I understand it, these are flown out of a Pakistani base.” Pakistani foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi denied that this was true.
In September 28, a spokesman for the Pakistani army condemned Washington’s killing of Pakistani civilians and warned of retaliatory action: “Border violations by US-led forces in Afghanistan, which have killed scores of Pakistani civilians, would no longer be tolerated, and we have informed them that we reserve the right to self defense and that we will retaliate if the US continues cross-border attacks.”
The British newspaper The Times stated on February 18, 2009 that the CIA was using Shamsi airfield, 190 miles southwest of Quetta and 30 miles from the Afghan border, as its base for drone operations. Safar Khan, a journalist based in the area near Shamsi, told the Times, “We can see the planes flying from the base. The area around the base is a high-security zone and no one is allowed there”.Top US officials confirmed to Fox News Channel that Shamsi airfield had been used by the CIA to launch the drones since 2002.
The drone attacks continue, despite repeated requests made by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari through different channels. Baitullah Mehsud while claiming responsibility for the 2009 Lahore police academy attacks, stated that it was in retaliation for the drone attacks.[94] According to The Daily Telegraph, Pakistani intelligence has agreed to secretly provide information to the United States on Mehsud’s and his militants’ whereabouts while publicly the Pakistani government will continue to condemn the attacks.
According to Pakistani authorities, from January 14, 2006 to April 8, 2009, 60 U.S. strikes against Pakistan killed 701 people, of which 14 were Al-Qaeda militants and 687 ‘innocent civilians’.
On April 28, 2009 Pakistan’s consul general to the US, Aqil Nadeem, asked the US to hand over control of its drones in Pakistan to his government. Said Nadeem, “Do we want to lose the war on terror or do we want to keep those weapons classified? If the American government insists on our true cooperation, then they should also be helping us in fighting those terrorists.” President Zardari has also requested that Pakistan be given control over the drones but this has been rejected by the US who are worried that Pakistanis will leak information about targets to militants.
On August 20, 2009 the Pakistan Air Force announced that it would begin development on its own version, called Falco, of unmanned aerial vehicles in collaboration with Italian company Selex Galileo. Production was to begin at the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex in Kamra.
Human rights issues
On June 3, 2009, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) delivered a report sharply critical of US tactics. The report asserted that the US government has failed to keep track of civilian casualties of its military operations, including the drone attacks, and to provide means for citizens of affected nations to obtain information about the casualties and any legal inquests regarding them. Any such information held by the U.S. military is allegedly inaccessible to public due to the high level of secrecy surrounding the drone attacks program. The US representative at UNHRC has argued that the UN investigator for extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions does not have jurisdiction over US military actions[99], while another US diplomat claimed that the US military is investigating any wrongdoing and doing all it can to furnish information about the deaths.
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Pakistan, Reporting from Washington DC
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 21st, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
It is easy to sum up the situation in regard to Muslims being believed that they intend to lead a healing attempt while creating a furor that can only result in a new heating up of deep sentiments. If the intent was by some to build a Mosque at the place of victory over the infidel, but the Muslim majority was – or was not – part of that intent – is now irrelevant. The way out can be by moving the new Islamic Center to some place – “in eye contact” – across the water – Brooklyn, Staten Island, New Jersey – and dedicate it as originally stated to a CORDOBA HOUSE – rather then the limping Park 51 Project.
We want also to point at the clearly sluggish pace of donations to Pakistan as another outcome from this last stand taken by Muslims in America – and the threat hanging over America’s head that 100 million young Pakistani Muslims, helped by extremists at their moment of physical constraints, rather then by their own government, nor by the Western cultures, as nothing less then the evolution of Bin Laden because of his fight against the America propped up Saudi regime.
The reality is that internal disagreements in the Islamic world are being projected against US Administrations that support out of convenience the existing regimes in these Islamic countries, and the extremists stood up in efforts to oppose their own leaders, and only secondly, took upon themselves to fight the protectors of the hated regimes.
The US people are not supposed to understand all of that when faced with a 9/11 and are not to be stepped upon even in a case where the superficial right as well as the deep meaning of American Democracy is on their side. Clever Arab States will try – like the Obama Administration is trying – to build bridges rather then burrowing in the trenches of the small print. Go ahead and show magnanimity.
By the way, could little Kuwait that offered $5 million to Pakistan, without ever having been involved in the dismantling of that country, or the UAE at $1.5 million, tell the much larger Saudi Arabia, that shipped its own Jihadists to Pakistan being part of the internal fracas there, that according to UN listings offered now peanuts to Pakistan – could they do some more when compared with the US offer of $150 million. Actually – just remember those two planes of Bin Laden family being shipped out from a US under air embargo by the Bush family, those days immediately following 9/11. There are very good reasons for Americans to be mad and for Arabs to take the low road that we suggest can be in this case the real high road.
———————
From all that sea of articles in the press of today – I pick the following as it is the easiest – it is from aol:
NATION
Construction Workers Oppose Mosque Near Ground Zero
by Hugh Collins, Contributor to aol News.
NEW YORK (Aug. 20) — The proposed Islamic center near ground zero is facing stiff opposition from a group that will be vital if the plan is to be realized: the New York City building industry.
Construction worker Andy Sullivan has set up a “Hard Hat Pledge” on his website, calling on construction workers to vow not to do work on the Park51 community center and mosque, the New York Daily News said.
Diane Bondareff, MCT
Mosque opponent Andy Sullivan stands outside the site of the proposed mosque and Islamic center on Park Place near lower Manhattan’s ground zero on Thursday.
Sullivan is not alone. Several New York construction workers interviewed by AOL News declared their opposition to the project.
“It doesn’t make any sense to be there,” said Eduard Nika, a marble worker. “The mentality these people have, it’s not anything to do with religion.”
The planned mosque and community center two blocks from the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed 3,000 people has spiraled from a local zoning issue into a national political debate.
Public figures such as Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich have blasted the plan, saying it is an insult to the families of the victims. The Anti-Defamation League, whose mission statement says it exists to fight “all forms of bigotry,” has said the center should be built at another location.
Others, such as Mayor Michael Bloomberg and President Barack Obama, have said that while they understand the strong resentment the project arouses, any effort to block the Islamic center would infringe on American values of freedom.
Handyman Frank Rivera, who said three of his relatives were in the World Trade Center at the time of the attack but survived, believes the project would be bad for New York City and an insult to the families of victims.
“It shouldn’t be there. It’s a slap in the face,” Rivera said.
Like Nika, he said he would sooner quit his job than work on the project.
But not everyone is opposed to the Islamic center. Mike Bakovic, who works in interior construction and painting, said he’d work on the project — even if he didn’t get paid.
“Muslim people have the freedom or religion, same as everyone else, the Jew, the Catholic, everyone else,” Bakovic said. “Islam is peaceable, like every other religion. “
Louis Coletti, president of the Building Trades Employers Association, told the Daily News that labor unions had not taken a “formal position” on the plan. Still, he said it was ” a very difficult dilemma for the contractors and organized labor force.”
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Arab Asia, Bahrain, Kuwait, New York, Obama Styling, Policy Lessons from Mad Cow Disease, Qatar, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC, Saudi Arabia, UAE
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 21st, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
Let us remember, back in 1945 in San Francisco, at the founding of the UN, Brazil was considered the leading State outside the five WWII powers that became the Veto wielding P5. Brazil has had its ups and downs since then – quite a few downs – but now it is on a high up – clearly strongest and leading nation on the Southern half of the Western hemisphere.
——————————
Expanding Alliances in the 21st Century: The U.S. and Brazil Unite to Address Matters of National Security
The recent signing of a new defense agreement between the Western hemisphere’s two dominant powers, Brazil and the United States, has brought about an important change to Latin America’s relations with the U.S. On April 12, 2010, Brazil took another step to enhance its geopolitical influence by signing the U.S.-Brazil Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA). The treaty will allow U.S. military cooperation on a Brazilian base with the aim of defending the hemisphere from illicit drug trafficking and to protect both countries’ national interests. As Brazil continues to be a linchpin of economic stability in Latin America and is increasingly viewed as being on its way to becoming a global superpower, the Brazilian government is realizing that its power comes with a price. The cost of such a position carries a price tag in terms of its security costs. Brazil has achieved a sufficiently high profile that it must significantly increase its defense so as to protect its population.
An Uneasy Past
Military relations between the two nations date back to World War II when Brazil participated in the Allied effort by providing troops to fight in the 1942 Italian Campaign. The first defense treaty between the two nations was created in 1952, with the signing of the Brazilian Military Assistance Agreement. The accord enabled the provisional exchange of major weapons and training by the United States to its Brazilian counterpart, as the countries proceeded to form a tenuous alliance that governed their bilateral ties during the Cold War1. However, this alliance was short-lived and suffered multiple blowouts. After Brazil’s 1964 military coup, the U.S. continued to provide military aid in the form of training and supplies in order to support the pro-U.S. governments that were in power. Nonetheless, the U.S. began to limit its assistance during this time.
For full article click here
This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Juan Pablo Pitarque
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Brazil, Canada, Latin America, Reporting from Washington DC, The ALBA Charge, UN Commission on Sustainable Development
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
It is all about real time information that can be used via computers for all kind of purpose – the FAO is specific about fires, but the visit at the GRT headquarters convinced us that uses can range from CIA work, natural resources mapping, to every single aspect of climate change – be those fires or floods.
What you need is a satellite and cellphones. If you have people on the ground you can work on rescue efforts – people in the field and imagery. You do a field driven real-time assessment of damages and go out as consultants to train the trainers. Very neat indeed!
How about watching the looters after a disaster? The images we saw can help recognize them. We can then move to recognize patterns and predict events before they occur!
–
The hand-held Motorola device that is taken to the field costs now $2500 and will come down to $500. But don’t forget, it must have a distant analytic backup. It is a powerful tool to coordinate military – civilian cooperation in disasters such as Haiti – and to be up-to-date also now in Pakistan. Did they get the Pakistan contract? What they can do is to pass on from the military to NGOs the task of doing the real work after it was drawn by a military-first intervention.
–
For now, we learned, GRT in Haiti works with the UN, it does not have yet direct contracts with the countries. We were told that the UNHCR (The UN Humanitarian and Crisis Relief) throws money at a problem but this analysis can be a tool to create good and spend less.
–
Michael Gray is the CEO of Global Relief Technologies, Chip Peter is the Chief Technology Officer and he went with a team to Haiti.
RDMS is their trademark-ed Rapid Data Management System founded in 2003 to help organizations in remote or disconnected environments report critical information in real time: COLLECT – COMMUNICATE – COLLABORATE.
I got a whole collection of examples of their work – with the American Red Cross, with Hospital Ships, with Raytheon in Afghanistan, with insurance companies in the Wenchuan, China, eartquake, and you bet – forest fires in Maine.
–
=======================================================================
and from the UN DAILY NEWS from the UNITED NATIONS NEWS SERVICE.
11 August, 2010
=========================================================================
as per – http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/44613/icode/
The UN SAYS – “NEW UN ONLINE TOOL DETECTS GLOBAL FIRE HOTSPOTS IN REAL TIME.”
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) today unveiled a new online portal to help countries monitor fires and protect property with data from satellites operated by the United States space agency NASA.
The new Global Fire Information Management System (GFIMS) shows fire hotspots almost in real time, with a lag of 2.5 hours between when satellites pass over fires to when information is available.
Developed with the University of Maryland, it also allows users to receive email alerts, allowing them to react quickly.
The launch of GFIMS comes at a time when the incidence of megafires is on the rise, according to Pieter van Lierop, an FAO Forestry Officer responsible for the agency’s activities in fire management.
“The control of these fires has become an issue of high importance, not only because of the increasing number of area burned but also because of the relations with issues of global interest, like climate change,” he stressed.
The unprecedented heat wave in Russia, which saw temperatures soar to 40 degrees Celsius and winds of up to 20 metres per second, have caused more than 14 million acres to burn. Forest fires have already claimed more than 50 lives this summer in Russia.
Globally, vegetation fires affect some 350 million hectares of land annually, with half or more of this area situated in Europe.
Until recently, people managing natural resources faced hurdles in obtaining timely and satellite-driven information on vegetation fires.
“The information was very fragmented because it was gathered from various sources making it unsuitable for precise analysis and identifying trends,” said John Latham, Senior Environment Office in FAO’s Natural Resources Management and Environment Department.
GFIMS, he said, delivers essential data to its users while fires are still burning.
————————
FAO launches NASA-developed fire monitoring system.
|
11-08-2010
|
Will help countries to detect fire hotspots in real time
|
GFIMS will help countries to detect fire hotspots in near real time.
11 August 2010, Rome – FAO today has launched a new online portal on fire information and real time monitoring to help countries to control fire effectively and protect property and natural resources. The new Global Fire Information Management System (GFIMS) detects fire hotspots from satellites operated by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Developed in collaboration with the University of Maryland, GFIMS has an online mapping interface for displaying fire hotspots in “near real” time meaning that there is a lag of approximately 2.5 hours between satellite overpass and the data being available. The new system also allows users to receive email alerts on specific areas of interest, enabling subscribers to react quickly.
“The GFIMS has been launched at a time when the incidence of megafires tends to increase,” said Pieter van Lierop, FAO Forestry Officer, who is responsible for the agency’s activities in fire management.
“The control of these fires has become an issue of high importance, not only because of the increasing number of casualties and the huge amounts of area burned but also because of the relations with issues of global interest, like climate change.”
In Russia alone this year due to the unprecedented heat wave with temperatures soaring to up to 40ºC and winds of up to 20 metres per second the total area burned has reached more than 14 million hectares, according to the data provided by the Sukachev Institute for Forests, based in Krasnoyarsk. Forest fires in Russia have already killed more than 50 people this summer.
Globally, vegetation fires affect an estimated 350 million ha of land each year- about half or more of this area is burnt in Africa. In the Mediterranean, between 700 000 and one million hectares are damaged by vegetation fires every year.
Easy to use
Until recently, natural resource managers have faced considerable challenges in obtaining timely satellite-derived information on vegetation fires.
“The information was very fragmented because it was gathered from various sources making it unsuitable for precise analysis and identifying trends,” – said John Latham, FAO Senior Environment Officer in the Natural Resources Management and Environment Department. – “GFIMS is an integrated fire information system which delivers the essential data to its users while the fires are still burning.”
GFIMS allows users to download fire information in minimal file sizes and in easy-to-use formats, including text files, ESRI shapefiles, Web Map Services, Google Earth/KML files, and a plug-in for NASA World Wind.
“GFIMS has also provoked strong research interest,” added Latham. “Linking the system to land cover shows us what is burning. GFIMS now provides analysis on trends of prevalence of fire by year and month, and will include information on the size of burnt area by land cover type in the future. It will result in improving analytical data and timely response.”
The system could be used by forest managers and fire fighters, as well as agencies involved in agricultural and natural resources monitoring. The subscription is free of charge. The system only requires a functioning email address. Initially GFIMS has been launched in three languages – English, French and Spanish. The monitoring system is hosted at the FAO’s Natural Resources Management and Environment Department.
—————————–
Image of smoke over Western Russia taken from NASA’s Terra satellite.
—————————–
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/
![[ Fire Map image ]](http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/firemap.jpg)
Global 10-day fire maps are generated using the MODIS Rapid Response fire locations to represent the current fire activity across the world.
+ Read more
+ Fire location data
| Mission |
MODIS Image of the Day |
| The MODIS Rapid Response System was developed to provide daily satellite images of the Earth’s landmasses in near real time. True-color, photo-like imagery and false-color imagery are available within a few hours of being collected, making the system a valuable resource for organizations like the U.S. Forest Service and the international fire monitoring community, who use the images to track fires; the United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service, who monitors crops and growing conditions; and the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the United States Air Force Weather Agency, who track dust and ash in the atmosphere. The science community also uses the system in projects like the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET), which studies particles like smoke, pollution, or dust in the atmosphere. More information about science and application partners, including links, is provided on our applications page. Captioned interpreted images for educators, the media, and the public are available through the Earth Observatory. The system is freely available to everyone–scientists, operational users, educators, and the general public. Please see our Usage Guidelines.
The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) flies onboard NASA’s Aqua and Terra satellites as part of the NASA-centered international Earth Observing System. Both satellites orbit the Earth from pole to pole, seeing most of the globe every day. Onboard Terra, MODIS sees the Earth during the morning, while Aqua MODIS orbits the Earth in the afternoon. |
: Tropical Storm Dianmu (05W) approaching Korea
|
| Near-Real-Time MODIS Data |
| MODIS level 2 clouds, aerosols, snow, sea ice, fire, land surface temperature, and land surface reflectance products are available within 2.5 hours of observation at LANCE-MODIS. |
|
|
|
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Archives, Copenhagen COP15, Futurism, Global Warming issues, New Hampshire, Pakistan, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
Aid only trickles to Pakistan’s monsoon disaster.
By Reza Sayah, CNN
August 18, 2010
Islamabad, Pakistan (CNN) — Pakistan is reeling from a natural disaster affecting 20 million people but relief groups say donors have been painfully slow in helping.
When a magnitude 7.0 earthquake hit Haiti in January, donors responded with $13 billion in aid. Within 24 hours Hollywood mega-stars like George Clooney, Madonna, Tom Cruise and Beyonce had signed up for a telethon to raise money for Haiti’s quake victims.
By contrast nearly three weeks after flood waters inundated one-fifth of Pakistan, the United Nations has collected roughly half of the $460 million it has called for to meet the immediate needs of 20 million flood victims.
This week Oscar winner and U.N. goodwill ambassador Angelina Jolie made a high-profile plea to ask the international community to give more aid to Pakistan.
Video: Photographer focuses on Pakistan flood
Video: Aid trickles into flood ravaged Pakistan
Pakistan’s flood-affected areas
Pakistan flood: Before and after
“Hopefully there are a lot of people ready to give money,” Jolie told British television network ITN.
Aid workers and analysts say there are several possibilities why governments, individual donors and celebrities are not giving to Pakistan the way they’ve done with other disasters. None, they add, is a good excuse.
The relatively low death toll — roughly 1,500 killed — may have created the impression that Pakistan’s floods are not as severe as the Haiti quake and the Indian Ocean Tsunami where tens of thousands were instantly killed.
U.N. officials say the death toll in Pakistan’s floods belies the desperate and often life-threatening conditions of the 20 million victims. Many of them have lost their homes, their belongings and their sources of income.
Analysts say governments may also be suffering from “donor fatigue” with Pakistan. For years now Pakistan has been on a seemingly constant round of donor needs — money to revive its feeble economy, fight the Taliban, recover from the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, the 2009 refugee crisis and now these floods.
“A donor never gets fatigued,” Islamabad-based political analyst Mosharraf Zaidi told CNN.
“A donor, just as an idea, is not about ‘I’m fresh so I’ll give.’ You don’t give because you’re fresh. You give because of humanity.”
There’s also the perception that Pakistan is run by corrupt politicians and the aid won’t get to those who need it.
This week Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani insisted all aid would be transparent. Aid professionals say if you don’t trust the Pakistani government, then give to an international aid group you do trust.
“There are so many ways people can give that doesn’t have to be rooted in the government if that was a concern,” said OXFAM’s country director in Pakistan, Neva Khan.
Aid groups and analysts say the worst excuse not to give is the perception among many in the west that Pakistan is just not a good place, a country full of militants. It’s an image reinforced by the media’s obsession with extremism in Pakistan, says Mosharraf Zaidi.
“I think that coverage is fundamentally one of great reasons why it’s been hard for people to reach into their wallet.”
The cooling global economy may also have governments and individuals reluctant to give but analysts say the consequences of not giving to Pakistan could be costly.
In the short run people will go hungry, suffer from disease, and lose their fight to survive. In the long run a nation that’s critical in the fight against extremism may face a political crisis that could further destabilize the region.
————————
Except for Kuwait and the UAE – the Islamic States are not on the donor list – Why? Is this not Ramadan time – if nothing else?
Seemingly, it is all coming from the US, UK, EU, Japan, Australia, Denmark, Switzerland. We find China at less the $2 million – and we learned that Pakistan refused $5 million from India. At the pledging we learned that Georgia is contributing $1oo,ooo and there are small amounts from around the world.
All of the above seems strange but clear to us. It is the US that fights to keep Pakistan in one piece as it did in Iraq. Can Pakistan hold when the real enemy is climate change?
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Arab Asia, Archives, Asia & Australia, Bangkok, China, Denmark, European Union, Georgia, Japan, Kuwait, Pakistan, Real World's News, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC, United Kingdom
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
These tough days for the US economy – a stand out – New Hampshire Job Growth in Recession.
- New Hampshire outpaced every other state except Kentucky in job growth over the last year, according to information released by the U.S. Department of Labor.
- According to preliminary figures, the Granite State experienced job growth of
1.43 % between June 2009 and June 2010, which resulted new 8,900 jobs.
———————————
From the New Hampshire Overview Prepared by:
Michael Bergeron, NH Business Development ManagerNew Hampshire Division of Economic Development, August 9, 2010603-271-2591 mbergeron@dred.state.nh.us
for:

———————————-
•“The magic of New Hampshire: Big enoughto get things done, small enough to reallystand out” Dean Kaman— DEKA R & D

Dean Kamen’s DEKA—Manchester, New Hampshire.
{ We wrote about the visit at his place in Manchester when we reviewed FIRST and Senator Shaheen’s visit there.
http://www.sustainabilitank.info/categor… }
New Hampshire cuts through state government red tape so that businesses don’t have to spend time fighting a slow bureaucracy.
The contention of New Hampshire business is – Our office provides:
- Excellent customer service
- Facilitate state permits
- Help when needed but otherwise, stays out of your way
So, What makes New Hampshire
different than other states?

New Hampshire’s state motto:
LIVE FREE OR DIE
New Hampshire
- Control state spending
- Lower tax burden
- Individual freedom
- Individual responsibility
- Success based on merit
- Land ownership rights
- Right to bear arms for selfdefense
- Citizens Legislature
————-
They contend that there are – Two different fundamental government approaches:
1. Give us more of your money and if you fall into a certain class and/or location, we may reimburse or credit you for a period of time, and then we will impose a tax on you so we can offer credits and grants to someone else.

or -
2. You keep more of you money and we keep taxes lower—but that means you also don’t receive a long list of special credits, exemptions, and subsidies—this is what New Hampshire does.
——————————————————————————–
Foundational differences:
New Hampshire has a Citizens’ legislature
New Hampshire does not support professional politicians
New Hampshire has 400 Representatives and 24 Senators all of whom get only $100 per year.
*No broad base personal income tax *No sales tax *No use tax *No inventory tax *No capital gains tax *No professional service tax *Corp tax: 8.5% of net business income
State of New Hampshire Net Income
Fiscal Year 2008 $1.247 Billion

New Hampshire Tax Details – 8.5% of net business income.
Business Profits Tax:
-
- 1.The tax is imposed at the rate of 8.5% on the taxablebusiness profits of every business organization (RSA Sec.77-A:2).
- Business Enterprise Tax
- 2. A business enterprise tax is imposed at the rate of 0.75%of the taxable enterprise value tax base of every businessenterprise (RSA Sec. 77-E:2). This is a dollar for dollar credit against the business profits tax.
- “Enterprise value tax base” means the sum of all compensation paid or accrued, interest paid or accrued, and dividends paid by the business enterprise, before special adjustments or apportionment (RSA Sec. 77-E:1).
————————————————————-
THEY OFFER AN -
•Economic Revitalization Tax Credit
$200,000 cap over 5 years, 40K per year cap
•R & D Tax Credit
$50,000 cap each year, 5 year maximum
•Job Training Program
50/50 cash match, customized training, no cap
New Hampshire ERZ: Economic Revitalization Zone
———————————————————–
What is the amount of the tax credit?
*$40,000 cap per year,
* Capped at $200,000 over five years, with carry over up to 10 years.
*Credit against Business Profits or
Enterprise Tax (BPT or BET).
R & D Tax Credit
• 10% of the business organization’s qualified manufacturing research and development expenditures (salaries related to new research) up $50,000 tax credit per year.
State of New Hampshire
Business Energy Efficiency
Audit Program
- No cost energy efficiency assessment & comprehensive energy audit program available through the NH Business Resource Center.
- All business sectors eligible (commercial, retail, hospitality, healthcare, arts, etc) -special emphasis on manufacturing.
- Eligible businesses must agree to try to implement at least some of the suggested measures if at all possible.
- Help with exploring various financing options.
————————————————————–
NH Job Training Grant Program
- *
- Customized group training
- *
- Cash grant–up to 50/50 match with state
- *
- No cap
• Training can be done at the company or other location.
Example of national rankings
New Hampshire:
6th highest per capita income in the U.S.-U.S. Census 09 “Most Livable State” in U.S., Morgan Quitno 2003-2008 (4th in 2010) “4nd Healthiest State”, United Health Foundation 09 3nd Lowest crime rate in U.S., Morgan Quitno 09

New Hampshire is the Most Business Friendly State in the Northeast
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Austria and Central Europe, Brussels, China, Japan, New Hampshire, Reporting from Washington DC
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
A new paper released by the Canadian International Council asserts that while Canada may need to wait for the United States before deciding on a carbon pricing system, that should not stop it from exploring other initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Change and Foreign Policy in Canada: Intersection and Influence, written by John Drexhage and Deborah Murphy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development’s climate change and energy program, argues that the Copenhagen Accord has the potential to develop a solid foundation and framework to help countries begin to respond effectively to climate change.
The Canadian government must determine what it wants in terms of a climate and energy regulatory regime; work with the provinces and stakeholders to identify the best way of going forward in Canada; and ensure that this plan would complement US actions and legislation.
The authors recommend the following actions to strengthen Canadian climate change policy:
• A First Ministers’ Meeting to address Canadian energy and climate change policy, and Canada’s profile in the North American energy picture.
• The federal government should develop a credible and comprehensive plan that lays out how Canada intends to meet its target of a 17-percent emissions reduction below 2005 levels by 2020.
• Canada should increase support for adaptation strategies and activities at home in the Arctic and in developing countries through bilateral and multilateral assistance.
• Canada’s $400-million contribution under the Copenhagen Accord should create opportunities for bilateral project assistance, including “signature” projects that can be identified with Canada and led by Canadians.
Climate Change and Foreign Policy in Canada: Intersection and Influence can be accessed online at http://www.onlinecic.org/ .
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Alberta, British Columbia, Canada, Copenhagen COP15, Futurism, Reporting from Washington DC
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
| erom: |
CCRIF <pr@ccrif.org> |
|
|
| date |
Thu, Aug 19, 2010 |
| subject |
Caribbean Economics of Climate Adaptation Study results released. |
Please see attached press release regarding the publication of preliminary results of the study on the Economics of Climate Adaptation (ECA) in the Caribbean implemented by the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility and regional partners.
The results for eight pilot countries (Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, Dominica, Jamaica, and St. Lucia) are presented in a short brochure entitled, Enhancing the climate risk and adaptation fact base for the Caribbean (Preliminary Results).
The brochure is available on the CCRIF website at http://www.ccrif.org/sites/default/files/publications/ECABrochureFinalAugust182010.pdf
Regards,
Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF)
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in (British C. Islands), Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Caribbean Island States, Copenhagen COP15, Futurism, Global Warming issues, Islands & SIDS, Jamaica, Louisiana, Pakistan, Real World's News, Reporting from UNFCCC Meetings, Reporting from Washington DC, Saint Lucia
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
The conference ‘Deltas in Times of Climate Change’ starts 29 September 2010 in Rotterdam. More than 650 people from all over the world have already registered.
His Royal Highness the Prince of Orange, who is very much engaged in water management and climate change, will give the opening speech at the conference. Also speaking at the opening session will be: Michael Oppenheimer (Princeton University), Ahmed Aboutaleb (Mayor of Rotterdam), Martin Parry (IPCC) and Malcolm Smith (ARUP).
A day-to-day overview of Conference events can now be found on our website: www.climatedeltaconference.org.
The programme includes 70 challenging sessions of interest to policy makers, practitioners, business people, politicians and scientists. These sessions cover a broad range of issues related to climate change in deltas: flood risk management, fresh water availability, health, climate in the city, land use conflicts, governance, economics and estuarine ecosystems.
It is still possible to register for the conference, but as places are limited you are urged to do so soon.
Registration, travel and hotel reservations:
- Registration
- Travel and hotel reservations
We hope to welcome you at the conference in Rotterdam.
Florrie de Pater
Chair Organizing Committee
Organizing Committee:
Ottelien van Steenis
p/a Wageningen UR, P.O. Box , 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
T +31 317 48 6540
M +31 6 2120 2447
E o.van.steenis@programmabureauklimaat.nl
W www.climatedeltaconference.org
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Copenhagen COP15, Future Events, Netherlands
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
 |

from material supplied by the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE – Office of the Spokesman.
from the Secretary Clinton ‘s presentation to Plenary Meeting of the UN General Assembly on the Humanitarian Situation Resulting from the Floods in Pakistan
from Thursday, August 19, 2010
The General Assembly meeting is an opportunity to express solidarity and to further mobilize the support of Member States and the international community for the situation in Pakistan. The UN Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs has launched an initial appeal for $460 million for immediate relief in Pakistan.
Secretary Clinton also held bilateral meetings with Secretary General of the United Nations Ban Ki-Moon and Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi.
The United States is already responding to this crisis in a number of ways in close coordination with the Government of Pakistan and their disaster management specialists:
· To date, we have committed approximately $90 million to support relief efforts in Pakistan, including funding for the operations of the Pakistan National Disaster Management Authority, the UN’s emergency relief plan, and the many local and international organizations responding to this disaster. At the meeting the US pledged further 60 Million – for the total of $150 million.
· U.S. humanitarian relief experts have been deployed to the field.
· U.S. helicopters have evacuated 5,912 people and delivered 717,713 pounds of relief supplies.
· We’ve sent boats to help with search and rescue and water purification units to provide clean water for thousands of people as well as temporary bridges to replace the bridges damaged by the floods.
As Secretary Clinton said in a statement last week: “The United States has a history of working with the Government of Pakistan to respond to natural disasters. Today, we’re continuing that tradition. We’ve been working hard over the past year to build a partnership with the people of Pakistan and this is an essential element of that partnership; reaching out and helping each other in times of need.” For more information, please click here.
American citizens can contribute directly to this relief effort. Using cell phones, individuals can text the word “SWAT” to the number 50555 to make a $10 contribution that will help the UN High Commissioner for Refugees provide tents, clothing, food, clean drinking water, and medicine to people displaced by floods. When prompted, reply with “yes” to confirm your gift.
For additional details, you can also contact the UN Media accreditation Office (212) 963-6934.
——————————–
from Luqman Chaudhry <drluqmanchaudhry@gmail.com>
to drkluqman@yahoo.com
date Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:46 PM
subject PLUS Flood Relief Effort 2010 for Pakistan
signed-by gmail.com
hide details 1:46 PM (1 hour ago)
Pakistan League of USA
Flood relief effort
Dear Fellow Americans,
Pakistan League of USA is having a fund raising dinner in Gourmet Restaurant, Jackson Heights, New York on Thursday, August 26, 2010 to raise funds for the poor and needy who have suffered from the devastating floods. I urge you to join us or send your Zakat, Sadaqa and Fitrana for this noble cause. Please also spread the word about our effort; your friends and family are needed to add their help. Please use the attached contribution form for whatever you can afford. The contributions checks should be made to Pakistan League of USA and mail it to
Pakistan League of USA Flood Relief Center,
121 Jersey Ave, suite 203 New Brunswick, NJ 08901.
Your cooperation will be a) highly rewarded by Allah almighty. b) appreciated by us and the people of Pakistan.
Thanks,
Dr. Khalid Luqman
———————————————————————————————————-
My dear PLUS Executives, members BOT, BOD & PLUS well wishers, AOA
Pakistan League of USA has created a new website www.plusfloodreliefeffort2010.org . On this website, all the accounts regarding the collection and distribution of funds for the flood relief will be maintained . This will give clean and transparent accountability to the public and of course earn more credibility for PLUS. This website will be operational within one week and will be linked to our main website www.pakleagueusa.org
The contribution forms have been prepared and sent them to the printing press to be printed. Each form will be numbered. The printer has promised to give us back by Friday. Meanwhile if somebody needs to use those forms to collect funds, please open the contribution form attachment and print it. Please use only this receipt to collect funds.
If there is any question, please contact me on my cell at 908 705-5207 or my email drkluqman at gmail.com
Thanks and Regards,
Dr. Khalid Luqman Chaudhry
PLUS Flood Relief Effort Committee.
Tel: + 1 732 514-1763 Cell 908 705-5207
———————————————————————————————————
Pakistan League of USA
Flood Relief Effort 2010
We are writing to you about the natural disaster that has struck Pakistan. Monsoon rains have caused unprecedented flooding destroying large parts of our country. The flooding is forecast to continue, increasing the devastation and dislocation that has affected the Pakistani people.
Every part of Pakistan - from Khyber Pakhtoonkha to Baluchistan, from Gilgit Baltistan to Sindh, and from Azad Kashmir to Punjab – is reeling from the effects of this natural disaster. The death toll is now in the thousands and expected to rise. More than 15 million people have lost their homes. The survivors need food, emergency shelter, and medical supplies. Children are especially at risk of diseases such as cholera and malaria and gastro caused by the flooding. Hundreds have already died and we fear the total will continue to climb.
Pakistan needs our help and needs it now. As Americans we have an obligation to help those in need.
Pakistan League of USA (PLUS) is a leading Pakistani American organization which has previously provided funds and medical supplies to the victims of the October 2008 earthquake. PLUS has once again taken up this challenge and is committing all of our resources to help in the flood relief effort of Pakistani nation.
Pakistan needs us now. We are duty bound to help our motherland. Please join with us to help Pakistan survive this very grave situation.
——————————————————————————————————-
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Archives, Pakistan, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
Pakistan to clamp down on Islamist militant charities.
1 / 33
A boy sits on a bed in a makeshift roadside camp for flood victims, in Muzaffargarh district of Punjab province August 20, 2010. Pakistan said it will clamp down on charities linked to Islamist militants trying to exploit anger among flood victims, amid fears their involvement in the relief effort would undermine the fight against groups like the Taliban.
Credit: Reuters/Reinhard Krause
Zeeshan Haider
ISLAMABAD (Reuters) – Pakistan said it will clamp down on charities linked to Islamist militants amid fears their involvement in flood relief, exploiting anger against the government, will undermine the fight against groups like the Taliban.
Islamist charities have moved in swiftly to fill the vacuum left by a government overwhelmed by the scale of the disaster and struggling to reach millions of people in dire need of shelter, food and clean water.
It would not be the first time the government has announced restrictions against charities tied to militant groups. Critics say any banned organizations often re-emerge under new names, with authorities uninterested in stopping their operations.
“The banned organizations are not allowed to visit flood-hit areas,” Interior Minister Rehman Malik told Reuters. “We will arrest members of banned organizations collecting funds and will try them under the Anti-Terrorism Act.”
Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and a senior U.S. senator warned on Thursday that militants were trying to promote their cause during the floods, similar to what happened after an earthquake in Pakistan Kashmir in 2005.
More than 4 million Pakistanis have been made homeless by nearly three weeks of floods, making the critical task of securing greater amounts of aid more urgent.
Eight million people are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.
The floods have marooned villages, killed livestock, destroyed power stations and destroyed roads and bridges — lifelines for villagers — just as the government had made some progress in stabilizing the country through offensives against Taliban insurgents.
Weather officials said floods could recede in Punjab province but there was a danger of more rain in Sindh province over the next week. These provinces, where the majority of Pakistanis live, have been hit hardest by the floods.
“All the rivers in Punjab have fallen back to normal flow and there was no forecast of any flood-generating rains across the country,” said Ajmal Shah, director of Pakistan’s Flood Forecasting Division.
The United States led a stream of pledges of more funds for Pakistan during a special meeting of the U.N. General Assembly on Thursday. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton promised a further $60 million, bringing to more than $150 million the contribution Washington would make toward emergency flood relief.
British Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell said London was doubling its contribution to nearly $100 million. Speaking for the European Union, Belgian Foreign Minister Steven Vanackere promised a further 30 million euros ($38.5 million) on top of 110 million euros already committed.
The United Nations has issued an appeal for $459 million, of which Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said about 60 percent had been pledged.
U.S. Senator John Kerry, who visited flood-hit areas with Zardari on Thursday, said action must be taken to prevent anyone from exploiting frustrations.
“We need to address that rapidly to avoid their impatience boiling over, and people exploiting that impatience and I think it’s important for all of us to understand that challenge,” Kerry said, in a clear reference to the Taliban. “We also share security concerns.”
Highlighting the wider problems facing Pakistan, 14 people were killed on Thursday in different incidents of targeted killings in Karachi after a Pashtun political leader was gunned down, a sign of underlying ethnic and political tensions in the country’s biggest city.
About one-third of Pakistan has been hit by the floods, with waters stretching tens of miles (km) from rivers.
The United States needs a stable Pakistan, which it sees as the most important ally in the war against militancy, especially in neighboring Afghanistan, where a Taliban insurgency is raging.
Zardari, who drew a hail of criticism after he left on a trip to meet the leaders of Britain and France as the disaster unfolded, also said militants could capitalize on the floods.
In a sign of growing concerns over the ramifications of the floods, Kerry said $200 million from the $7.5 billion U.S. aid package for Pakistan over five years, which he co-authored, would be diverted to the relief effort.
Pakistan officials are due to meet the International Monetary Fund next week for talks on easing growth and fiscal deficit targets following the country’s worst ever floods.
Pakistan turned to the IMF in 2008 for emergency financing to avert a balance of payments crisis and shore up reserves, agreeing to a set of conditions including revenue targets.
The IMF meetings will start on August 23 and were scheduled for even before the floods began. In May, Pakistan received $1.13 billion, the fifth tranche of a $11.3 billion IMF loan.
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Archives, Asia & Australia, Pakistan, Real World's News, Reporting from Washington DC
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 20th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
August 19, 2010, before the UN started its meetings, the Asia Society in New York opened the discussion on the Pakistan Flood response by diving right to the bottom truth – the latest mega-disasters have one common cause – human induced climate change. It was Financier George Soros who injected the topic and the media was allowed by Ambassador Holbrooke to follow up. See what you can do when you go outside the UN!
Ambassador Dr. Richard C. Holbrooke, former Chairman of the Board of the Asia Society, and now US Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, chaired the 8:30 am event at his New York home – the Asia Society – on the day when for 3:00 pm the UN General Assembly scheduled a pledging event for funding Pakistan relief. At the UN, for the US, spoke Secretary of State Hilary Rodham Clinton, and I saw on TV the complete Asia Society American team sitting in the hall. The team included also Judith A. McHale, US Department of State Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, Dr. George Erik Rupp, a theologian, President of the International Rescue Committee and former President of Rice University and Columbia University, and Raymond Offenheiser, President of Oxfam America.
The opening speaker after Ambassador Holbrooke was Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, and the panel included also USAID Administrator Dr. Rajiv Shah. Then there was a list of guests that made their comments, followed by questions from the floor and answers from Administrator Dr. Shah and Ambassador Qureshi.
enlarge image
L to R: USAID’s Dr. Rajiv Shah, Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, and Ambassador Richard C. Holbrooke. (Else Ruiz/Asia Society)
–
Judith A. McHale, a former media head herself ( President and Chief Executive Officer of Discovery Communications – 1987 to 2006), and now with the US Government, said that information is critical. “We work with the government of Pakistan to provide the critical information on the ground. It is posted on www.State.gov
Among the guests were Financier George Soros, whose Open Society Institute and Soros Foundations work on the ground in Pakistan – he announced that he adds another $5 million to the funds that his foundation will work with in helping directly civil society in Pakistan, Christopher MacCormac of the Asian Development Bank, which is leading the effort to assess the flood damage, said much of the economic infrastructure of the area has been destroyed. 2 million ha. of crops were lost and livestock have been devastated, which has taken a large toll on Pakistan farmers. ADB has said that after the immediate contribution of $3 million from the ASia-Pacific Disaster Fund, it would loan Pakistan $2 billion to help the country rebuild, and Pakistan’s rock star turned political activist Salman Ahmad, known as Pakistan’s Bono, or as Holbrooke pointed out, “Bono is the Irish Salman Ahmad,” pointed out a very important topic:
“This is a defining moment in Pakistan,” Ahmad said. “This flood has set back Pakistan in a huge way. Out of 175 million people, 100 million are under 25. Those young people are skeptical, and they feel abandoned by the world. The international community has to win hearts and minds of those 100 million youth in Pakistan.” “If there is a sluggish response the terrorists/extremists win.” He also said that last year he had a concert at the UN to show to the young people in Pakistan that there was hope – he said that he is sure the international community will react positively.
Ambassador Holbrooke said that in the catastrophe there is also an opportunity, that we should not miss - the people in Pakistan should see that the world is ready to help. He found that these elements of hope in opportunity were missing in the day’s article in The New York Times.
For the US the strategic implications are clear. The US pulled out helicopters from the military effort in order to help in the rescue effort. Will the Taliban take advantage of this? A US transport ship with materials arrived to Karachi, and Japan will now also send helicopters to help in the rescue effort.
The meeting was summarized by The Asia Society and there is also the full tape at -
http://asiasociety.org/policy-politics/e…
Further, Ms. Nafis Sadik from the UN, now a Trustee Emeritus of the Asia Society and Chair of the Pakistan Foundation at the Asia Society called for Ramadan giving to the Foundation. Other Pakistan-Americans spoke and told of their own efforts to raise funds for the Pakistan relief program as the State’s capacity to meet the challenge has been overstretched. Today Pakistan , one fifth of its territory submerged, 68 million of its people affected, and 1,600 people dead, crops, animal stock, and infrastructure devastated – Pakistan is calling – humanity is calling they said. We saw a video proving every point. The Pakistan-American Foundation was inspired by Hilary Clinton’s “Pakistani Peacebuilders.”
Oxfam America was joined by “Save the Chidren” NGO representative Gorel Bogarde said the obvious – what children most need is food, clean drinking water and shelter. She is most concerned for the moment about the outbreak of water-bourne diseases, such as cholera.
We will not repeat here further figures of loss and the size of the calamity. We assume that these are known by our readers by now – we want rather to point out the blunt comments that resulted from the statement by Mr. Soros who linked what happens to our lack of readiness to do something about the human-made climate change. Pakistan is the biggest of the recent disasters he said and we must deal with the root causes he continued. CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE ROOT CAUSE FOR ALL THESE RECENT DISASTERS. Mr. Soros spoke of the coincidence of the Himalaya glaciers melting and the monsoons getting stronger at the same time.
He also said “there is a certain amount of fatigue in responding to these disasters… [but] we have to come to terms with the fact that they are in fact connected, that there is climate change.”
At the Q & A part of the program, I asked the last question that was intended to bring the attention back to what Mr. Soros said.
My question was something like – I am with Sustainable Development Media and I wonder what Pakistan thinks about Mr. Soros’ statement about climate change – the reason being that the present calamity will repeat itself, so how does one do reconstruction work that makes sense?
Ambassador Holbrooke said Thank You and addressed the question first to Mr. Rajiv Shah.
When asked if there was a connection between the floods and climate change, USAID’s Shah said “while it’s very hard to attribute any single event to what we’re doing to our global environment it is very clear that that trend is leading to a greater number of large hurricanes, a greater number of floods, hotter and dryer conditions in places that are dependent on weather and rainfall for agriculture, and it’s making it very difficult for the least resilient, the most lower income communities of the world to survive.”
We heard from Mr. Christopher MacCormac that after the Earth Quake of 2005 the rebuilding of houses was done according to higher standards – so what we need here in the response to the present calamity is also to build better – but he did not specify, neither did Mr. Holbrooke. This, with the understanding that the increased monsoon floods, joined with the melting of the Himalaya Glaciers, is indeed not a one time shot – but the beginning of a trend – leaves us with very bad premonitions about the future of Pakistan and other low lying lands of the region. This has clearly left me thinking about what means building better? Are we going to take into account these new phenomena resulting from global use of fossil fuels when going from the immediate reaction to the suffering from the floods to the longer range rebuilding stage? This is clearly an area that will be written up much more in the foreseeable future.
Ambassador Qurashi was asked by Mr. Holbrooke to react to the climate change implications. Are there additional run-off from the Himalayas?
The answer included: The Glaciers melt and what we have in Pakistan are Monsoon water plus glacier melts combined. We have above normal moisture.
He also said that “There are local NGOs in Pakistan that help push back the extremists and you have shown the world that you are a helping Nation.”
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Afghanistan, Arab Asia, Archives, Asia & Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Copenhagen COP15, European Union, Futurism, Geneva, Global Warming issues, India, Islands & SIDS, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar/Burma, Nairobi, Nepal, Pakistan, Real World's News, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC, Tajikistan, The New Climate, Three Poles Melting, Tibet, UN Commission on Sustainable Development, United Kingdom
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 19th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
UNelections Monitor, Issue #149 – OCHA Selection Process Critiqued, Amos to Begin September 1, 2010.
https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inb…
New York, August 19, 2010 – The UN Office for the Coordination of https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inb… will have a new Under-Secretary-General and Emergency Relief Coordinator on September 1.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon appointed Valerie Amos of the United Kingdom on July 9 to replace current Director John Holmes, who will step down at the end of this month. Amos is currently the U.K.’s High Commissioner to Australia.
Ban’s selection process has been critiqued by humanitarian groups and others on several grounds, outlined below.
About Valerie Amos
In addition to her current post in Australia, Amos has served as:
- Member of Committee on Commonwealth Membership – 2006-2007
- Leader of the Labour Party, House of Lords – 2003-2007
- Secretary of State for International Development – 2003 (6 months)
- Minister for African Affairs in British Foreign Office – 2001-2003
Amos holds the title of Baroness, conferred by UK Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1997, as she joined the House of Lords.
The UN said that Amos “brings to this position extensive background and experience coupled with well-honed leadership skills and the ability to forge consensus, coordinate delivery of results and work with diverse stakeholders…. John Holmes … said that she will bring to the job a lifetime of commitment to issues of economic and social justice, and huge political experience, not least in Africa, where so many of our operations are.”
Role of Director
The role of Director of OCHA is at the Under-Secretary-General level.
The USG is responsible for oversight of all emergencies requiring UN humanitarian assistance and acts as the focal point for relief activities involving governments, intergovernmental agencies and NGOs.
Selection Process and Critiques
Criticisms of Ban’s appointment practices to date have been based on two primary concerns:
- Claims to key posts by specific donor countries, and
- Politically-motivated, rather than expertise-based decisions.
In the case of selecting a successor to Holmes, both concerns were voiced.
Member State Entitlements
The practice of donor countries and other powerful countries laying claim to key posts has long been a concern in high-level appointments. Some posts, such as the Executive Director of UNICEF, have been claimed by the same donor government for decades (in UNICEF’s case, the United States). In the past, the U.K. has had influence over the head of DPA. U.K. nationals held this USG role from 1971 to 2005, when Kofi Annan appointed Ibrahim Gambari of Nigeria to the post. Gambari was succeeded by Pascoe, DPA’s current head.
According to Foreign Policy’s blog Turtle Bay, diplomats have criticized Ban’s demonstrated preference for political appointees over experienced practitioners. In the case of the OCHA appointment, the list of individuals that was reported to be under consideration by Ban largely consisted of high-ranking U.K. politicians, seemingly confirming the continued practice of reserving top UN posts for diplomats or politicians from powerful or donor countries. Civil society groups, as well, have challenged this practice.
Before the OCHA appointment was made, some anticipated that the post would be filled by another U.K. national, or a national of another major donor country. “It is no secret the [U.K.] would like to have that job back,” said one observer.
However, OCHA has not been consistently led by the national of one country, as have other offices.
The former directors of OCHA are:
- Sérgio Vieira de Mello (Brazil),
- Kenzo Oshima (Japan),
- Jan Egeland (Norway), and
- John Holmes (United Kingdom).
Upon Amos’ appointment, a spokesperson for Secretary-General Ban was asked whether there was a “set formula” for assigning specific high-level posts to specific countries. The spokesperson said, “Obviously there is an effort to make sure that there is a diverse range of nationalities appointed to jobs at the United Nations. But there is no set formula, no.”
More than previous Secretaries-General, argues Turtle Bay, Ban Ki-moon has favored political appointees. Ban reportedly “accepted the favored candidates of each of the UN’s powerful permanent five members in his first year in office, according to senior UN officials.”
Political appointments can present conflicts with the independence of the office. Appointing someone on the recommendation of a donor state not only risks compromising qualified leadership of the office at stake (as discussed below). It also could undermine the sworn political independence of the appointee. At the very least, it can create the perception of a conflict of interest.
Prior to Amos’ appointment, Turtle Bay quoted the International Council of Voluntary Agencies, a major humanitarian network, calling for Ban to “appoint the new emergency relief coordinator on the basis of qualification and experience, instead of that person’s nationality…. We don’t want a political appointee who might require a year-long training and induction program on humanitarian response. We need someone who understands humanitarian organizations and their work.”
The UNelections Campaign does not support the traditional claims by donor governments to selected high-level posts in the UN Secretariat. While the individuals nominated may be qualified in their respective fields, the motivations of a political appointment could prevent the selection of the best person for the job from any region or background. Perhaps more importantly, the tradition that the most powerful Member States wield control in the UN via political appointments to key positions implies, and can result in, compromised independence for the UN body.
Qualifications
The national claims to key posts, described above, can have an effect on the weight given to qualifications in selection processes.
Political appointments can compromise the expertise of the office. The article in Turtle Bay – “The Decline of the International Civil Servant” – characterizes how high-level UN jobs are given out, and it is not a process that depends on relevant expertise: “[M]ost experts in the field need not apply. If history is any guide, Holmes’s replacement will be selected from a small pool of influential countries who are rewarded with the most important U.N. jobs. It’s more likely Holmes’ successor will be a diplomat or politician than someone who has experience managing relief operations.”
One blog, Global Memo, which focuses on high-level appointments, noted the British government’s “desire that the selection process be ‘open and merit-based.’” The first steps to achieving this goal would be for the Secretariat to outline criteria for individual nominees and to consider nominees from any Member State, not only the most powerful.
In addition to these two frequent critiques, the UNelections Campaign has noted the lack of transparency in Ban’s recruitment process, in particular the refusal to release “shortlists” of final candidates to the public, as was done in previous appointments including the 2005 selection of António Guterres the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in European Union, Pakistan, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC, United Kingdom
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 19th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
| rom |
Kerry, Peggy <kerryp@state.gov> |
|
|
| date |
Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM |
| subject |
Statement by Ambassador Rice Commemorating World Humanitarian Day 0n 8-19-10. |
|
|
|
|
USUN PRESS RELEASE #163 Aug. 18, 2010
Statement by Ambassador Susan Rice, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, commemorating World Humanitarian Day, August 19, 2010
Seven years ago, a truck bomb exploded beneath the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq, killing 22 people and wounding more than 100, including the UN envoy, Sérgio Vieira de Mello, and three American civilians. On this second annual World Humanitarian Day, the United States remembers the victims of the Canal Hotel bombing and others like them: citizens who have given their expertise, devotion, and, all too often, their lives providing relief for the suffering. We also recognize the growing depth and complexity of humanitarian challenges and honor the efforts of today’s brave humanitarians to meet them. On this day of remembrance, we call upon all nations and parties to assist and protect the individuals who work to provide humanitarian relief, wherever it is needed.
Today in Pakistan’s flood-ravaged regions, more than 14 million people urgently need help. The United States has already provided approximately $90 million to assist Pakistanis in harm’s way. U.S. helicopters have evacuated 5,912 people and delivered 717,713 pounds of relief supplies. Still, the scale of the catastrophe defies imagination; it requires the efforts of countless humanitarians and aid organizations to assist the homeless, the hungry, and the sick. Cash contributions help these organizations meet the needs of humanitarians on the ground, and can be transferred quickly. Texting the word “SWAT” to 50555 directs a $10 donation to the UN Refugee Agency for tents and emergency aid to displaced families. At www.interaction.org, visitors may access a list of organizations accepting cash donations for flood relief.
On World Humanitarian Day, the United States also recognizes the efforts of aid workers in Haiti, including those who tragically lost their lives in January’s earthquake. At once, the disaster devastated Haiti’s fragile foundations and killed many people who were best qualified to help Haitians rebuild. The expertise of the humanitarians there is indispensable. We grieve with the families of those who were lost.
Across the world this year, aid workers risked great danger by responding to environmental disaster. But the United States also notes with profound alarm the rise in premeditated violence targeting aid workers – including the recent murder of ten NGO workers, six of them Americans, by the Taliban in Northern Afghanistan. Acts such as these shock the conscience and further energize efforts to defeat violent extremism, but their numbers continue to rise: from 65 victims of serious security incidents in 1999, for example, to 278 victims in 2009. In light of these terrible acts, we condemn the persistence of insidious rhetoric by political actors who portray aid workers as outsiders representing foreign interests, governments, and ideologies. As the United Nations has noted, most humanitarians come from the countries in which they work. They are inspired by the principle of impartiality that guides all aid work, and come from a variety of nationalities, ethnicities, and religious communities. We join the global community in rejecting attacks on humanitarians, and rededicating ourselves to ensuring that aid can be delivered without fear.
Assistance to humanitarians is both a moral issue and a practical imperative for global security. Yet even when aid workers are buttressed by supportive national governments and parties to conflict, their work carries grave risks. Amid flood waters in Pakistan, humanitarians are called to address hardship on a scale that is nearly without precedent, and serve bravely despite facing the very same dangers themselves. On this and all days, we are grateful for their work and we honor their enduring pursuit of security, dignity, and hope for all people.
Permalink |
| Email This Article
Posted in Afghanistan, Haiti, Pakistan, Policy Lessons from Mad Cow Disease, Real World's News, Reporting From the UN Headquarters in New York, Reporting from Washington DC, Three Poles Melting
Discuss this article
###
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on August 19th, 2010
by Pincas Jawetz (PJ@SustainabiliTank.com)
| from: |
K N Vajpai (Climate Himalaya Initiative) <knvajpai@gmail.com> |
August 19, 2010
| Climate Change Updates from Himalayan Mountains on Various Climate Change Issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For your information, the Climate Himalaya Initiative http://www.climatehimalaya.net has a dedicated news portal http://chimalaya.org/ , that updates the Climate Change related news on regular basis from Himalayan Mountains.
Those interested in Climate Change related issues and Mountains, can get regular updates by subscribing or becoming member.
The ongoing issues includes; Pakistan Floods, Leh Cloud Burst, Climate Change Modeling, Domestic Actions by countries, Actions by Asian countries, Cancun Climate Summit, Criticism of IPCC, etc…..!
There are options for subscription, membership, tweeting, facebook, among others….!
You can visit and explore at http://www.climatehimalaya.net
from – K N Vajpai
Convener and Theme Leader
Climate Himalaya Initiative
http://www.climatehimalaya.net
http://chimalaya.org
C/O Prakriti a mountain environment group
P.O. Silli, Agastyamuni, Rudraprayag
Uttarakhand, India PIN 246421
info@climatehimalaya.net
knvajpai@prakriti-india.org
|
| |