|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on May 11th, 2013 Climate Change Adaptation, Not to be Missed
### | ||||||||||||
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on April 29th, 2013 It was Saturday night April 27, 2013 – doors opened at 7:30 PM and stretched till 4 o’clock in the morning. The opening march started at 9 PM sharp and the place was packed. The conferencier for the evening was Marianne Schulze a Human Rights expert and consultant on matters of the handicapped. It was just like any other opening march during the Vienna Ball season except that you saw also couples of two men or two women, a very tall man and a short woman, some physically bent, mixed race couples and no specific dress codes except that all in festive closing an the women wore a violet boa feather garland – though in different ways of putting it on. Many men had a green tie and even a woman or two had such a tie. It was all in fun and nobody tried to do it de rigueur. There were two bands – the Jazz D’accord band for the introductory part and the Vienna very conventional music SIGMA big.dance.band of mainly young women. There was also the performance of a mixed group of dancers under the Stanek & competence-circle and DanceAbility that performed what some might have thought was an early Robert Wilson choreography – you know – the one about Sigmund Freud and his dreams. It was terrific and included the wanderings of a short elderly woman in a green dress that looked autistic, two young people in wheel chairs, several Spiderman all covered figures – a man and a woman – some people with various handicaps and some without – but all moving to the beat of the music at slow speed. The first row of chairs around the square dancing stage was taken by what the manager of the event called the “ministers” – but I recognized only Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek, the Austrian politician of the Austrian Green Party and its federal spokeswoman, in line to be a minister when the Greens become members of the governing coalition. She and the other dignitaries were escorted to their seats by a variety of costumed people – some looking like angels others in stocking-garb that made them look like painted nudes – and Ms. Glawischnig got honored with one of the latter men – all in green. Not to be misunderstood – please note that this was not a Green event – actually I would say it was a Chamber of Commerce backed event. The WKO-Wien has its Network Diversity – they create value by recognizing value. They explain Diversity as “Multiple” or perhaps Multiplicity – a valuable potential for the economy – and recommend to the businesses to take advantage of the diversity. Diversity can be in age, origin (ethnicity), Health or being Handicapped, Sexual orientation, religion. Monika Haider, the CEO of “equalizent” and the head of the Honor Guard of the event, said that DIVERSITY MAKES OUR SOCIETY STRONG – because we all profit from the different experiences, talents, ideas, opinions – of a heterogeneous society. A main interest is as well in migration. Migrants or refugees that came to Austria, and residents in camps overseas, are of interest to the WKO and were among the honorary guests to the Ball. We received notice that Monday, May 6th, 2013, as part of the 3rd Vienna Integration Weak there will be a Vienna Economy Day of Diversity. There will be a series of lectures 9 am – 5-pm, and in parallel a series of business consultations in Turkish, Polish, Bosnian-Kroatian-Serb, Chinese, Bulgarian, and Slowakian. Part of this program was also a business publication about Austrian business – “Kosmo” that was given out to us in a Slavic language. But that is not all – “equalizent” is teaching languages to the hearing and speach impaired and trying to sound funny someone suggested that this means teaching those that cannot pronounce one language as well how to be able not to pronounce another language as well. But without jokes – this clearly is an important hand to the handicapped that is thus made part of normal life. Further members of the Honor Guard and seated in the front rows were – Brigitte Jank, President of the Chamber of Commerce, Vienna; Federal Minister Labor, Social Affairs, and Consumer Protection, Maria Vassilakou, of the Green Party, Deputy Mayor of Vienna; Petra Draxl, head of the Vienna Employment Services, actress Dagmar Koller. While most of the above went on in the downstairs hall, and many of the people sitting in the garden and the side rooms – eating the traditional fare of Vienna Balls – gulash soup and Debreciner sausages – starting 10 pm Babsi Bandi in full voice and Jo Spelbrink in sign language – led the interminal young through terrific drumming by the Vienna naBum band – a cross between the North East of Brazil Capoeira culture and mother Africa that define themselves as a “beatfactory project.” Then there were the DJane CounTessa/ Brunhilde Collective led by Petra Grosinic who arrived as a child from Croatia and lives with her parents in Vienna’s Ottakring District known for its immigrants diversity. At her mother’s hair-dressing business she got to know Anne Wiederhold, the head of the Brunnenpassage DJane-Workshop and then with the women participants they created the “Brunhilde Collective.” Her mix is Reggea. They were followed by the !DelaDap DJ-Set with Tania Saedi as vocalist. This upper level Ball crowd had really a Ball. Here I saw something great. For those interested, the Black Jack tables of Casinos Austria at the Kursalon were available as usual – in the Lehar Hall. The effort to integrate the handicapped into normal life became crystal clear in the way people enjoyed themselves at this ball – at the dancing by the participants. Obviously – the hearing and speech impaired did not stick out – but the wheel chair people dancing with their wheelchairs was a totally different matter. I am sure I will never forget the sight of a young woman after having danced with her dancing-partner while in the wheel chair, then getting out of the chair and holding on to the side of the bar while the other woman sat in the wheel chair in her place and the dancing continued with the roles switched. Hurray for the the human spirit and Kudos to the organizers of the event. At 2 am, while downstairs continued the Sigma big.dance.band, on the third floor there was the Salon Kitty Revue & Music for Separees – Austria’s finest Burlesque show with added French Boylesque – who distributed leaflets to let you know you can see them again on May 11, 2013 at the Arena Variete Cafe, Margaretenstrasse 117, 1050 Vienna. To see the cast please go to - www.salon-kitty.net/?page_id=10 The recurrent motto: RESPECT AND TOLERANCE AND AGAINST DISCRIMINATION. MORE ABOUT EQUALIZENT – the institution that helped and is helped by this Ball: Their motto is that LANGUAGE is the interface between Identity, Education, and Human Interaction – so their contribution is to language. If needed language is supported by sign language and WITAF is the outreach for integration via sign-language. June 7, 2013 there will be a presentation about studying with impairement of hearing. Further information at www.plig.at For a full listing of the Equalizent courses please see - www.equalizent.com For more about the work of “Equalizent” Teaching and Consulting Ltd. Dr. Anna Gudra offered her direct contact – at Obere Augartenstrasse 20, 1020 Vienna. tel: 01/409 83 18- 32 anna.gudra at equalizent.com
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on April 28th, 2013 What the following article does not dare to mention – seemingly not to hurt the Koches – is that the troubles of the citi-opera – the high culture second New York City opera – the one that was created in order to give home to new experiments in opera, light opera/operettas, and musical theater – the kind of material that could not be put on the stage of the Meropolitan Opera – having lost two seasons at the time of reconstruction of the building – just could not afford it anymore – and one might even think that they were not to the Koch Brothers tastes.Now the information is as follows: The David H. Koch Theater is a building intended for theater and ballet, modern and other forms of dance, part of the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts located at the intersection of Columbus Avenue and 63rd Street in New York City. Originally named the New York State Theater,[1] the house has been home to the New York City Ballet since its opening in 1964 – that did return to the renamed building. It also served as home to the New York City Opera from 1964 to 2011 – that did not return to the renamed building. The theater occupies the south side of the main plaza of Lincoln Center, opposite Avery Fisher Hall. Many in New York liked the look of the interior of the original building with the huge Promenade its two large statues by Elie Nadelman sculptuers and actually found nothing wrong with the building and its use. When the Lincoln Center’s decision to redo and rename the building – the decision was received with extreme alacrity by various organized groups.
The oil and gas money of the Koch Brothers serves to lubricate right wing policies in the US – among these also the Climate Change deniers – but then there is also a patina of art covering their name – the like of putting the Koch name next to Lincoln.
In July 2008, oil-and-gas billionaire David H. Koch pledged to provide $100 million over the next 10 years for the purpose of renovating the theater and providing for an operating and maintenance endowment. It was renamed the David H. Koch Theater at the New York City Ballet Winter gala, Tuesday, November 25, of that year. [2] The theater is to bear his name for at least fifty years, after which it may be renamed; the Koch family retains the right of first refusal for any renaming. {The Wikipedia} Also: Mr. David Koch is an executive vice president and a board member of Koch Industries, based in Wichita, Kan., and owns a diverse group of companies with more than $100 billion in revenues and 80,000 employees in nearly 60 countries. The companies’ brands include Stainmaster carpet, Lycra spandex, Quilted Northern tissue and Dixie cups and tabletop products. Koch Industries, founded in 1927 by Mr. Koch’s father, Fred, with a fleet of oil-delivery trucks, became the nation’s largest privately held company in November 2005, when it acquired the paper maker Georgia-Pacific for $13.2 billion. Born in Wichita, Mr. Koch earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees in chemical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to which he donated $100 million for cancer research in October. Other charitable donations have included $20 million to the American Museum of Natural History in 2006 for the David H. Koch Dinosaur Wing. That same year he promised $20 million to Johns Hopkins University’s medical campus in Baltimore, a gift that resulted in the new David H. Koch Cancer Research Building. Mr. Koch also serves as the board chairman and chief executive of the Koch Chemical Technology Group, a wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries, and on more than 20 nonprofit boards, including those of American Ballet Theater, the American Museum of Natural History and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Mr. Koch’s home in Aspen, Colo., famous for its New Year’s Eve parties in his bachelor days, boasts trophies from big-game hunts with his father in Botswana and Mozambique. A pair of 130-pound Ugandan elephant tusks frames the dining room. He and his wife, Julia, have three children. Mr. Koch, a major contributor to the Republican Party and supporter of conservative causes, was the vice presidential candidate on the Libertarian ticket in 1980. In 2003 he helped establish the nonprofit Americans for Prosperity Foundation, which supports free-market policies and promotes government spending limits. It split off from an earlier Koch-backed enterprise, now called FreedomWorks, which promotes similar goals. In short – he is a most important financial backer of everything connected to the Tea Party. In recent years Mr. and Mrs. Koch have become fixtures on the New York social circuit. They were honored at the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s annual corporate benefit, at the Food Allergy Ball in 2005 and at the American Museum of Natural History in 2006. His taste in real estate made news in 2006 when, seeking more space for his family, Mr. Koch sold his apartment at 1040 Fifth Avenue, once owned by Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, and moved to 740 Park Avenue, home to business titans like Ronald S. Lauder and Mr. Schwarzman. Mr. Koch said that he considered Mr. Schwarzman’s gift to the library an inspiration. “I admire people like that immensely — who have great wealth but are generous in terms of supporting worthy causes,” he said. ========================================================= www.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/arts/music/city-opera-might-do-best-at-city-center.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130427Critic’s Notebook
Why Not Have City Opera Go Home to City Center?
via New York City Center
The New York City Opera started at City Center in 1944. Above, the center in more recent years.
By ANTHONY TOMMASINI
Published in the New York Times : April 26, 2013
Last spring, reflecting on the completion of New York City Opera’s first season as an itinerant company bringing productions to the people in theaters throughout the city, George Steel, its general and artistic director, defended his decision to abandon Lincoln Center and argued that things were going well.
Wayne Tigges in New York City Opera’s “Moses in Egypt,” at City Center.
“We are playing to our strengths,” Mr. Steel said in an interview. Looking ahead to the 2012-13 season, he said that City Opera would be “out in the city with four brand-new productions of unusual works.” That, he asserted, “is what our audiences are interested in.” Maybe so. On Saturday night at City Center, the company presents the final performance of its fourth and last production of the 2012-13 season: the director Christopher Alden’s zany, slightly surreal and exhilarating staging of Offenbach’s operetta “La Périchole.” Say what you will about today’s City Opera being only a remnant of its former self, artistically Mr. Steel has delivered on his promise. This season he presented bold productions of four unusual works. At least three, including “La Périchole,” have been must-see events for operagoers in New York. “La Périchole” was the second consecutive production at City Center, the company’s birthplace, which it left in 1965 to take up residence in Lincoln Center, in what was then the New York State Theater (now the David H. Koch Theater). It felt like a homecoming to see the company on the City Center stage. The renovated City Center is now much more inviting and comfortable. And whatever they did to that theater improved the acoustics. It might make sense, and would certainly simplify things, for City Opera to move back there. Many challenges would be met if the company had a home. The season began in February at the Brooklyn Academy of Music with the director Jay Scheib’s dazzling staging of “Powder Her Face,” the 1995 debut opera by the audacious British composer Thomas Adès about the real-life sex scandal involving the Duchess of Argyll. Much of the buzz concerned the scene in which the mezzo-soprano Allison Cook, playing the Duchess, reflected on her sexcapades while some two dozen fully naked men casually strolled by. But the production also involved an inventive use of live videos, with a camera following characters to back rooms. For a week “Powder Her Face” was the most daring theatrical event in New York. The following week, also at the academy, was Britten’s “Turn of the Screw” in an updated production by the director Sam Buntrock, who gave a “Poltergeist” twist to this 19th-century tale of a governess who comes to the haunted house of two orphaned children under the care of an absent uncle. If this was the least adventurous offering, it was still a novel take on the opera, and the cast was terrific. The company’s return to City Center happened this month with a Rossini rarity, “Moses in Egypt,” a stirring biblical drama, in a production by Michael Counts that used arresting videos to depict night skies, desert landscapes and, in the final scene, the parting of the Red Sea. The opera world has been talking about the potential of video to make possible a new kind of old-fashioned spectacle. This production pointed a way. And now there is Mr. Alden’s manic “Périchole,” Offenbach’s comedy about a couple, struggling street singers in Peru, who become entangled with the country’s daffy viceroy. As played by the dynamic bass Kevin Burdette in this production, the viceroy is a demented, jittery and sex-crazed ruler in some vaguely modern realm that could be Miami Beach as much as Lima. So where does this leave City Opera for the future? Mr. Steel made inspired choices of works and directors. All four shows were artistically strong. But because City Opera must rent space and build each production to order, it had to crowd its offerings into concentrated periods of two weeks each: the first two at the academy in February; the second two at City Center this month, for a total of just 16 performances. This now seems to be the template for City Opera: to offer four productions each season with the hope of expanding in the future. To his credit, as Mr. Steel explained in a phone interview, for the first time in a decade City Opera has balanced its books. Its operating budget of about $12 million may not be much. But it pays the bills. When might the company extend its season? “As soon as we have the money,” Mr. Steel said, an answer that should reassure his board and patrons. Unlike any opera company that maintains a home, City Opera has no chance to coast, in a good sense, by regularly bringing back successful past productions. I am not just talking the distant past. What about productions Mr. Steel has presented since taking charge in 2009? I long to see again Mr. Alden’s revelatory production of Bernstein’s opera “A Quiet Place.” The time has come to end the debate over whether Mr. Steel’s decision to abandon Lincoln Center was a visionary move or an act of desperation. The old City Opera is no more. Those who do not remember the company from its days of decades ago can read about it in the conductor Julius Rudel’s new memoir, “First and Lasting Impressions,” written with Rebecca Paller. Mr. Rudel recounts his 22 years as City Opera’s director, not just the triumphs and adventures, but also the follies and backstage contretemps. From left, Marie Lenormand, Philippe Talbot, Kevin Burdette (in the chair) and Philip Littell in City Opera’s “Périchole.” It is amazing, though, to look at the archives of City Opera and see how many productions the company offered at its height. For example, during the 1969-70 season (the combined two-month fall and two-month spring seasons), the company presented 21 productions, not just lots of standard repertory, but things like Shostakovich’s “Katerina Ismailova” and Ginastera’s “Bomarzo,” for a total of 145 performances. During the interview Mr. Steel spoke of the company as having two main bases: the Brooklyn Academy and City Center. Yet each will be used only once next season. Mark-Anthony Turnage’s outrageous yet moving opera “Anna Nicole” will have its American premiere at the academy in September; Mr. Alden’s new production of Mozart’s “Marriage of Figaro” will play City Center in April 2014. Mr. Steel, who has a keen interest in overlooked 18th-century operas, will offer a true rarity, Johann Christian Bach’s “Endimione” in its American premiere at El Museo del Barrio in East Harlem, an intimate space ideal for Baroque works. And City Opera will present a co-production of Bartok’s “Bluebeard’s Castle” with St. Ann’s Warehouse in Brooklyn that will utilize the warehouse’s entire 13,000-square-foot space. All enticing. Yet as long as City Opera remains a roving company presenting a handful of productions in various theaters, it is going to be harder to cultivate a strong profile and build loyal audiences. Mr. Steel has a tenacious commitment to his vision of a traveling opera company. The truth is he may not see other options. If Mr. Steel and his board would like to settle down somewhere — and there are compelling arguments to do so — the place seems obvious: City Center, where “the people’s opera” opened its doors in 1944. ### | |||||||||||||||||
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on April 12th, 2013
from material posted on the Inner City Press website that reports from the UN Headquarters in New York City:
Taken in part from the Inner City Press – UNITED NATIONS, April 12 report — “The reopening of UN Headquarters after its $2 billion renovation.
In the past, the Delegates Lounge had a big wooden bar, and a second floor loft serving coffee. Now, the loft is gone, and so is the wooden bar, replaced by one of black stone.The lobbyists for different causes used to sit in the upper level coffee shop and watch who comes in at the lower level, then do their business later at the bar. Also, Journalists would come after hours and meet delegates at the bar and get answers to traditionally unanswered questions while having a drink. Delegates were sitting or snoozing all day – in the hall itself – supported by warm color furniture. Now it seems that these activities of old will be interfered with by a much more rigorous structure, that to our amazement is colored a bright green. Inner City Press – photo here and Photo here – show green colored tables and a kindergarten-style set-up. The computers in the Lounge are now covered with plastic half-spheres, like in a women’s beauty parlor. Inner City Press on Friday asked Capital Master Plan chief Michael Adlerstein where the wooden bar has gone. He said he’d look into it, and let it be known that the designer of the new Delegates Lounge was none other than noted Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas. The chairs are on wheels; there are spindly rocking chairs reminiscent for those who’ve been there to those in the airport in Charlotte, North Carolina, writes Matthew Russell Lee – the Inner City Press coverage.
Adlerstein explained the layout as based on Dutch berms around fields. An Inner City Press reader, seeing the Tweeted photo, chimed in that the “chartreuse tables actually look like my kids’ elementary schools. They still have 1960s Soviet liberation art, I guess.”
Actually the art remains the same as before – donations from various countries Soviet-style art or not – this depends on the donor: the carpet or wall hanging of the Great Wall of China is back, returned from its sojourn in the UN’s North Lawn building. We post this because of the green color that we are instinctively fond of – except when BP painted their oil tanks green in an attempt to tell us that they are a green company. WE ARE VERY MUCH AFRAID THAT THE UN GREEN IS INDEED OF THE SAME PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT LIKE THE BP OF OLD. This sort of green image does not sooth our nerves. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on April 2nd, 2013
Op-Ed ColumnistFreedom Loses One.By DAVID BROOKSPublished: April 1, 2013 27 CommentsThe Conversation – David Brooks and Gail Collins talk between columns. All Conversations »
I don’t think we’ve paused sufficiently to celebrate the wonderful recent defeat for the cause of personal freedom. After all, these sorts of defeats don’t happen every day – David Brooks Over the past 40 years, personal freedom has been on a nearly uninterrupted winning streak. In the 1960s, we saw a great expansion of social and lifestyle freedom. In the 1980s, we saw a great expansion of economic freedom. Since then, we’ve had everything from jeans commercials to rock anthems to political conventions celebrating freedom as the highest ideal. People are much more at liberty these days to follow their desires, unhampered by social convention, religious and ethnic traditions and legal restraints. The big thinkers down through the ages warned us this was going to have downsides. Alexis de Tocqueville and Emile Durkheim thought that if people are left perfectly free to pursue their individual desires, they will discover their desires are unlimited and unquenchable. They’ll turn inward and become self-absorbed. Society will become atomized. You’ll end up with more loneliness and less community. Other big thinkers believed that if people are left perfectly free to follow their desires, their baser ones will end up dominating their nobler ones. For these writers, the goal in life is not primarily to be free but to be good. Being virtuous often means thwarting your inclinations, obeying a power outside yourself. It means maintaining a balance between liberty and restraint, restricting freedom for the sake of an ordered existence. As Edmund Burke put it: “Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites. … Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.” Recently, the balance between freedom and restraint has been thrown out of whack. People no longer even have a language to explain why freedom should sometimes be limited. The results are as predicted. A decaying social fabric, especially among the less fortunate. Decline in marriage. More children raised in unsteady homes. Higher debt levels as people spend to satisfy their cravings. But last week saw a setback for the forces of maximum freedom. A representative of millions of gays and lesbians went to the Supreme Court and asked the court to help put limits on their own freedom of choice. They asked for marriage. Marriage is one of those institutions — along with religion and military service — that restricts freedom. Marriage is about making a commitment that binds you for decades to come. It narrows your options on how you will spend your time, money and attention. Whether they understood it or not, the gays and lesbians represented at the court committed themselves to a certain agenda. They committed themselves to an institution that involves surrendering autonomy. They committed themselves to the idea that these self-restrictions should be reinforced by the state. They committed themselves to the idea that lifestyle choices are not just private affairs but work better when they are embedded in law. And far from being baffled by this attempt to use state power to restrict individual choice, most Americans seem to be applauding it. Once, gay culture was erroneously associated with bathhouses and nightclubs. Now, the gay and lesbian rights movement is associated with marriage and military service. Once the movement was associated with self-sacrifice, it was bound to become popular. Americans may no longer have a vocabulary to explain why freedom should sometimes be constricted, but they like it when they see people trying to do it. Once Americans acknowledged gay people exist, then, of course, they wanted them enmeshed in webs of obligation. I suspect that this shift in public acceptance will be permanent, unless it turns out that marriages are more unstable when two people of the same gender are involved. And, who knows, maybe we’ll see other spheres in life where restraints are placed on maximum personal choice. Maybe there will be sumptuary codes that will make lavish spending and C.E.O. salaries unseemly. Maybe there will be social codes so that people understand that the act of creating a child includes a lifetime commitment to give him or her an organized home. Maybe voters will restrain their appetite for their grandchildren’s money. Maybe more straight people will marry. The proponents of same-sex marriage used the language of equality and rights in promoting their cause, because that is the language we have floating around. But, if it wins, same-sex marriage will be a victory for the good life, which is about living in a society that induces you to narrow your choices and embrace your obligations. ————————-
A version of this op-ed appeared in print on April 2, 2013, on page A23 of the New York edition with the headline: Freedom Loses One. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on April 2nd, 2013 C2C Fellows / National Climate Seminar / Bard 04.02.13Dear friends and colleagues, This Wednesday at noon eastern on The National Climate Seminar, Katharine Wilkinson will discuss her book Between God and Green: How Evangelicals are Cultivating a Middle Ground on Climate Change. What is the source of this unexpected support for climate action? Is this a growing movement, or was it a “2008 moment”? Can creation care create space for conservative politicians to engage on climate? Dial in: 712-432-3100
Conference Code: 253385 Join us for this important conversation. Send advance questions for Dr. Wilkinson to climate@bard.edu. If you can’t make it live, all National Climate Seminar conversations are available as podcasts 24 hour after the calls.
In two weeks we have a National Climate Seminar EXTRAVAGANZA, with a 4/17 evening webinar featuring 350.org Executive Director, May Boeve, Island President Director Jon Shenk, and Thilmeeza Hussain, former UN Representative from the Maldives. The webinar is part of our National Conversation on Democracy and Climate. It follows a nationwide screening of The Island President. I include my Grist review of this amazing film below. Here’s the punchline: “This is the best film dealing with global warming in years. It is a story of classical proportion: of true heroism, courage and nobility, of eloquent soliloquy, of intimate moments, and of political intrigue, compromise, and betrayal.”
And finally, it’s not too late to sign up for our final C2C Fellows Leadership training of the spring, in Portland Oregon over the weekend of April 12-14. Please spread the word to undergrads and recent grads aspiring to sustainability leadership in policy, politics and business! Applications are due April 5th.
Thanks for the work you are doing,
Eban Goodstein Director, Bard CEP & Director, Bard MBA in Sustainability
=====================================================================================
Triumph, tragedy, and climate change: ‘The Island President’
“A cross between paradise and paradise.” This is how Mohammed Nasheed of the Maldives describes his nation in Jon Shenk’s powerful new film, The Island President.
Shenk follows President Nasheed over a one-year period, leading up to the Copenhagen climate summit, in a beautiful, courageous, and strangely hopeful story. The film resonates all the more deeply following last month’s coup in the Maldives. The story’s ending — perhaps tragic, perhaps a powerful continuation — is today unfolding in real time.
The Maldives is a string of 2,000 islands off the coast of India, home to about 300,000 people. The highest point in the country is only a few feet above sea level. Until 2008, the islands had been under dictatorial rule for decades.
After returning home from college in Britain, in the late ’80s, Nasheed became an activist for democratic reform. He was imprisoned 12 times, and tortured, enduring 18 months of solitary confinement. In 2008, he led the nation to free and fair elections, winning the presidency.
Shenk, with unprecedented access to a head of state, films a year-long journey of this charismatic, newly elected president. With climate change a clear and present threat to the very existence of his nation, Nasheed begins speaking out globally, and passionately, for all those on the front line of climate change. Finally, he arrives in Copenhagen to play a pivotal role in crafting a global climate deal in 2009.
This is the best film dealing with global warming in years. It is a story of classical proportion: of true heroism, courage and nobility, of eloquent soliloquy, of intimate moments, and of political intrigue, compromise, and betrayal.
The film is also visually stunning. The vast blue ocean is both a serene paradise, and a powerful, threatening force, driving Nasheed’s political urgency. The Maldives capital, Malé, looks like an oasis of buildings rising out of the ocean. When asked by a reporter what was his plan B, should there be no action to slow global warming, Nasheed responds, “We will die.”
Shenk follows Nasheed in strategy sessions with his cabinet as the team seeks to leverage their moral argument as the first victims of climate change, canaries in the coal mine. Nasheed gives speeches, and makes his case with heads of states and ministers at the U.K. Parliament, at the U.N. General Assembly, in India, and finally — during the dark, crushing days of Copenhagen.
I won’t spoil the ending, though it does surprise. I will say that this is a movie for a post-Copenhagen world. Copenhagen put a brutal end to a naïve view that the leaders of the world, pushed forward by a moral imperative, would overcome petty domestic politics and sign an enforceable deal to cut global emissions by 80 percent over the next 40 years. Instead, the meeting advanced a new framework of what could be a race to the top, anchored by national commitments, and driven by domestic political organizing, in the U.S., China, India, Europe, and Brazil.
This approach will be insufficient to save the people of the Maldives. But it is a start, and we are not done yet.
Last month, just after I screened the movie, President Nasheed was forced at gunpoint to resign from his office. Political opponents seized on the economic crisis and fundamentalists objections to Nasheed’s modernizing Islam. At clear and ongoing risk to his life, Nasheed decided to remain in the country, writing, speaking, leading marches, and fighting for democracy.
And this is the enduring lesson from the movie. President Nasheed and thousands of others in the Maldives understand that their land and lives are threatened both by the rising seas, and by the corrupt politics of business as usual. They continue to fight for both democracy and climate justice, in the face of imprisonment, beating, torture, and murder.
Back here in the U.S., there is no outside force stopping any one of us from declaring our candidacy to run as a clean energy/clean money candidate, for mayor, or city council, or the state legislature or Congress. There is nothing stopping us from starting a green team in our business or workplace, and driving sustainability changes there from the ground up.
And maybe, like this island president, we don’t win the first time, and maybe our victories are followed by setbacks. Nevertheless, action at this scale, sustained, by all of us, is what must happen to change the future.
New York City, says Nasheed, is no higher than the Maldives. A cross between paradise and paradise: this is where each of us lives, and that we all must defend. Check out the screening schedule (theislandpresident.
Mohamed Nasheed
Former President of the Maldives
Mohamed Nasheed is a Maldivian politician and one of the founders of the Maldivian Democratic Party, who served as the fourth President of the Maldives from 2008 to 2012. Wikipedia
Spouse: Laila Ali Abdulla (m. 2008)
Presidential term: November 11, 2008 – February 7, 2012
Previous office: President of the Maldives (2008 – 2012)
National Climate Seminar / Spring 2013 Schedule
Climate Seminar calls are Wednesdays at 12pm EST and held twice monthly via conference call. Assign the half-hour calls to your students for a chance to hear top scientists, analysts, and political leaders discuss climate and clean energy solutions. Have questions for the speakers? Email them beforehand or during the call to climate@bard.edu.
Date Presenter Conversation
Feb. 6 Daniel Lashof , Director, Climate and Clean Air Program, NRDC Cutting Carbon at Power Plants ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 31st, 2013
Dear Rightwing Catholic Islamophobes.By Professor Juan Cole on his blog 31 March 13
CNN reports,
Pope Francis’s willingness to wash the feet of a Muslim woman shows his concern for the very lowest stratum of society. Europe has millions of Muslims, and some are well off and well integrated into society. But many Muslims who immigrated into France and Italy for work got caught when the jobs dried up, and live in poor areas of the cities, being excluded from mainstream society or much hope of betterment. Women have lower status than men in such communities, so a poor Muslim woman in jail is just about the bottom of the social scale. Pope Francis is from Argentina, which has a large, successful Arab-heritage community that includes Muslims, and he is said to have deeply disagreed with his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, over the latter’s Regensburg speech in which he said things that Muslims found insulting. The thing that strikes me about all this is that there is a small strand of American Catholic conservatism that frankly despises both the poor and Muslims, and is one of the pillars of prejudice against Muslims (some call it Islamophobia) in the United States. Most Catholics in opinion polls have a more positive view of Islam and Muslims than is common among evangelical Protestants, but the rightwingers among them have a thing about Muslims (and about poor people). An example is former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani. Rep. Peter King of New York also comes to mind. Robert Spencer has made a career of defaming Islam and Muslims. Then there is professional bully Sean Hannity of Faux News. Paul Ryan uses the insulting language of “Islamic fascism” (fascism is a Western invention; most fascists in history have been of Christian heritage; and it has nothing to do with the Muslim faith). Ryan, far from serving the poor, wants to cut social services to them by savaging the government budget, and openly boasts of following prophet of selfishness Ayn Rand. These purveyors of hate speech against Muslims claim to be Catholics, and some of them are annoyingly Ultramontane, insisting on papal infallibility and trying to impose their values on all Americans. Yet the person they hold to be the vicar of Christ has just given humankind a different charge, of humility and of service to the least in society, many of whom are Muslims. So when will we see Rudy Giuliani, Sean Hannity and the others go to a prison to comfort inmates, and serve the Muslims among them? When will we see them kiss a Muslim’s feet? Or are they cafeteria Catholics, parading only the values that accord with their Ayn Rand heresy? ===================
Since 2007 we have posted quite a few of the events Prof. Juan Cole expressed an opinion about them.
UPCOMING EVENT Hisham B. Sharabi Memorial Lecture “Statelessness as the Core of the Palestinian Issue” with Dr. Juan Cole The Palestine Center
The Israeli-Palestinian issue makes the area one of the world’s longest-running geopolitical hotspots. It has been characterized as a territorial dispute, or a refugee problem, or even a problem of terrorism. It has been the subject of negotiations and agreements that always seem to fall apart. Dr. Juan Cole argues that the core of the issue is the statelessness of the Palestinians and that all the other problems stem from this condition. He will explore the meaning of statelessness for human and civil rights, property rights, and standing in negotiations, as well with regard to international regimes of law and diplomacy. Dr. Juan R.I. Cole is the Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan. He has written extensively on modern Islamic movements in Egypt, the Persian Gulf and South Asia and has given numerous media interviews on the war on terrorism and the Iraq War. His most recent book is Engaging the Muslim World (2009), and his Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East was published in 2007. Cole was the recipient of the Hudson Research Professorship in 2003, the National Endowment for the Humanities grant in 1991, and the Fulbright-Hays Islamic Civilization Postdoctoral Award in 1985-86. In November 2004, he was elected president of the Middle East Studies Association of North America and in 2006 was the recipient of Hunter College’s James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism. Since 2002, he has published the blog Informed Comment. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 30th, 2013 Bridging Cultures: Poetic Voices of the Muslim World • After over a year of planning and hard work by City Lore Director of Poetry Programs, Catherine Fletcher, City Lore is proud and excited to announce the launch of Poetic Voices of the Muslim World, a two-year initiative funded by NEH’s Bridging Cultures grant comprising programs and performances presented against the backdrop of a traveling exhibition and companion website, that will be presented in six cities across the country. www.Citylore.org Incorporating dialogue and performance, music and visual art to celebrate poetry of rare power and beauty — including ancient oral traditions still practiced today, literary forms that have flourished for more than a millennium and contemporary poetic arts — Poetic Voices of the Muslim World was developed in collaboration with national poetry library and literary center Poets House to fully explore the crucial role that poetry plays in Muslim cultures. The initiative opened in Los Angeles and Jacksonville, Florida, in March 2013; will move to Washington, D.C. and Milwaukee in September 2013; See the website (still in progress) and explore the exhibit here. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 29th, 2013
Prehistoric phallus among ancient findings in northern IsraelStone Age artifacts uncovered on the route of a planned rail line show a developed culture 9,000 years agoBy Matti Friedman, March 28, 2013, In the Times of Israel.
Archaeologists have uncovered remnants of a Stone Age culture on the route of a planned rail line in northern Israel, including obsidian arrowheads and fertility objects like a stone phallus and a carved depiction of female genitalia. The oldest ruins at the site date to 9,000 years ago, the Israel Antiquities Authority said, but it was still inhabited thousands of years later. The location was excavated in a salvage dig ahead of the construction of new train tracks from Haifa to Carmiel. The findings include the most complete buildings from that time discovered so far in Israel, and some of the oldest evidence of organized legume agriculture in the Middle East, archaeologists Yitzhak Paz and Yaakov Vardi said in a statement. The objects discovered at the site also show that residents traded with faraway cultures, they said. “The large number of tools made from obsidian, which is not found in Israel, shows trade ties with Turkey, Georgia and other areas as long ago as this period,” read the statement, released earlier this month. The fertility objects, like the small stone phallus, “also represented the fertility of the land,” they said. The archaeologists link those findings to a civilization that existed in what is now Israel between 5500 and 4500 BCE. The civilization, known as the Wadi Rabbah culture, was named for the first site at which it was discovered northeast of Tel Aviv in the 1950s. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 28th, 2013
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 24th, 2013 The Heschel Center for Sustainability is proud to present the:
Heschel-Inspired PESACH HAGGADAH Supplement
The Heschel Center for Sustainability
85 Nachalat Binyamin, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL 66102
Telephone: +972-3-560-8788
————————–
A Jew is asked to take a leap of action, rather than a leap of thought.
Much of what the bible demands can be comprised in one imperative: Remember!
–
Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel
===========================================
INTRODUCTION:
Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel was a leading teacher, activist, social critic, theologian, poet, philosopher, and scholar.
Born in Poland in 1907, Heschel received a traditional yeshiva education and obtained traditional semicha, rabbinical ordination, at the age of 16. He then studied at the University of Berlin, where he obtainedhis doctorate, and at the Hochschule für die Wissenschaft des Judentums, where he earned a second liberal rabbinic ordination. As a young man, Heschel studied with some of the best German-Jewish scholars, and even took over for Martin Buber as the head of the Lehrhaus Institute in Frankfurt. Escaping from the Nazis, Heschel found his way to the United States where, after a brief period at Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati, he landed at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (JTS) in 1945. Here, he served as Professor of Jewish Ethics and Mysticism until his death in 1972. During his tenure at JTS, Heschel explored many facets of Jewish thought and spirituality, authoring pioneering studies in modern theology, medieval Jewish philosophy, and biblical and Talmudic literature.
In his works, Heschel’s perspective revealed a combination of spiritual values together with social criticism and political activism. Through this lens, he saw the teachings of Hebrew prophets as a direct call for social action, and dedicated himself to taking direct action in the civil rights movement and protests against the Vietnam War.
The ideas elicited in Heschel’s pursuit of social justice and his analysis of Jewish views of humanity are applicable in so many situations, both modern and historical. Words written in relation to the civil rights movement resonate with the same pursuit of justice and freedom that we recount at the Seder table. It is for this reason that we have created this haggadah supplement, to enhance the traditional tale of Jewish enslavement and
freedom laid out in the Pesach story with the wise words of a Jewish theologian who lived through a contemporary version of the battle for freedom.
The Heschel Center for Sustainability was named in memory of this great teacher. Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel is an inspiration to us in that his life and ideas embody a rare synthesis of values: study and action, theology and ethics, a craving for wisdom and spiritual transcendence alongside a similar desire for peace and justice for all, spiritual depth and radical political activism, scholarship and social action, wonder and
‹radical amazement› at the natural world together with speaking truth to power in the political arena. Thus, the Heschel Center is guided by his vision – combining politics, social criticism, and spirituality – and his words. As a think-and-do tank, the Heschel Center goes beyond taking a leap of thought and takes the leap of action to create a sustainable world committed to the health of human beings and ecosystems, justice, and the preservation of the commonweal.
We would like to offer a very big thank you to those who contributed to this unique haggadah supplement, volunteering their time and passion to this collaborative project. All of the contributors to this collective work are members of the siach Network, a platform for environmental and social justice activists to converse, connect, and cooperate.
Finally, we would like to wish you a chag sameach. May your charoset be sweet, your maror be pungent, and your matzot nourish body and soul!
Dr. Orli Ronen and the Heschel Center Team
– 2 -
———————————————————————————————-
ENDS AND MEANS: SLAVERY, IDOLATRY AND FREEDOM, Dr. Jeremy Benstein
I am an end as well as a means, and so is the world: an end as well as a means. My view of the world and my
understanding of the self determine each other. The complete manipulation of the world results in the complete
instrumentalization of the self… (From Who Is Man?, Stanford University Press, 1965, p. 81)
How proud we are of our victories in the war with nature, proud of the multitude of instruments we have succeeded
in inventing, of the abundance of commodities we have been able to produce. Yet our victories have come to
resemble defeats. … Selling himself into slavery to things, man becomes a utensil that is broken at the fountain…
[The Sabbath exists] to set apart one day a week for freedom… a day on which we stop worshipping the idols of
technical civilization, a day on which we use no money… on which man avows his independence of that which is
the world›s chief idol… (From The Sabbath, Farrar Straus and Young, 1951, p. 3, 27-29)
The Haggadah text and the seder ceremony, according to the rabbis who framed them, should, begin with
the initial degraded condition of the Jewish people, and conclude with our final redeemed status. That much is
agreed upon.
but from there ensues an argument as to what the relevant narrative is: what is “true” degradation, and
what constitutes redemption? One position is of course that the most important story is that “once we were slaves, and
now we are free”—the tale of the great social and political transition from slavery to freedom.
but an other view has it that the original wretched status of the Jews was that our ancestors were idolaters, and they were
raised up into a position of faith in the Eternal. Two concepts of «lowly» origins are essentially two framings of Jewish history:
one emphasizing the political/historical dimension, the other the religious/spiritual side. Despite the surface differences, idolatry and slavery are conceptually related, even linked, and moreover, though they
seem distant from us today – how many slaveholders, slaves or idol-worshippers do you know? – are also closely connected
to contemporary society. What is slavery, deep down? Simply put, slaves exist to fulfill the needs and commands of others, with no possibility for choice or expression of their own.
Their owners do not acknowledge that slaves have their own dreams and desires, and when they internalize a slave mentality, slaves begin to see themselves in this way. Slavery involves taking a person, who is an end unto him or herself, and making that person a means to another’s ends.
In that respect, slavery is not a historical curiosity: even without whips or chains, today, from the traffic in women, to migrant labor,
to all kinds of oppressive social relations—sadly, the idea of slavery, even if not called that, is still very much with us. And idolatry? What does it mean to worship a mortal person, a force of nature, or money, or power, or our own ego or
needs, instead of an eternal transcendent God? Idolatry takes aspects of physical, temporal reality and ascribes to them
ultimate value.
Idolatry means taking something which is a means to other ends (money), or a part oa greater whole (nature, ourselves)—and mistaking it for an end, or for the whole. And in ascribing it divine status, it becomes something worthy of being served, sacrificed for, or “worshipped” in a variety of ways.
Both slavery and idolatry are contemporary threats precisely because of the degradation of the human spirit and the servility they entail. Heschel above connects the two: idolatrous enslavement to elements of the physical world, including the works of our own hands, and slavish idol-worship of things of the spirit.
When we take the need to consume, which is a means for the sake of achieving higher ends, and make it an end in itself, a force that shapes our lives, a goal that we serve and not the other way around—we pay a high price, both materially and spiritually.
And to the extent that there seem to be forces in our society beyond our control, such as economic forces in the worlds of finance and globalization, forces that serve narrow vested interests instead of the greater public good—how can we say we are truly free?
Mistaking mere means for ends in themselves, or true ends for means to other goals, or a small piece of reality for the whole of existence, are categorical «sins» that prevent us from fulfilling our social and spiritual human potential. The holiday of Pesach, with its many questions, is designed to get us to think about that potential, about not only achieving freedom, but using it for the good of all, and for the world of which we are but a part.
Contributed by Dr. Jeremy Benstein, Co-Founder and Deputy Director of the Heschel Center and Director of the
Environmental Fellows program. He holds a PhD in cultural anthropology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
-3-
—————————————————————————————
A PEOPLE IN THE LIKENESS OF GOD – Dror Bondi
The task of Jewish philosophy today is not only to describe the essence, but
also to set forth the universal relevance of Judaism, the bearing of its demands
upon the chance to remain human… We were not born by mere chance as by-
product of migration of nations or in the obscurity of a primitive past. God’s
vision of Israel came first and only then did we come into the world… Judaism
is an attempt to prove that in order to be a man, you have to be more than a
man, that in order to be a people, we have to be more than a people (God in
Search of Man, p. 421-422).
On Passover, we celebrate the birth of our people. What is the meaning of this
celebration? Are we celebrating the birth of our national or religious particularism?
What can be the moral or environmental meaning of such a private party?
Heschel teaches us that the source of our identity as a people is not a national or a
religious particularism, but an intimate relationship with the Universal
living God, with the Creator of all men in His likeness, of all His creation.
Heschel introduces us to a God who trusts in man, who calls upon us to act for social justice and to open our eyes to see
the environment of man as the creation of God. Instead of god as a concept that belongs to the Jewish religion or nation,
Heschel surprises us with the Universal living God who calls upon Israel to be a people in His image.
If a human being is but a human being, an individualist who cares first and foremost for himself and only then thinks
about the other and the environment, than he may become less than human. God trusts man that he can transcend him
self toward the other, that he can be reborn as more than a human being. And a human being who responds to this trust,
who acts in the likeness of God, indeed becomes God’s partner in the redemption of the world.
The phenomenal and innovative claim of Passover is that this very surprising view can also relate to a people, that Israel
is called to be a people more than a people. Namely, as a Jew you simply can’t be as in the paradox of the racist or oppressive
Jew, who destroys, for racism is the very opposite of the basis of his national identity and therefore ceases to be a “Jew”. After the holocaust, Heschel called the Jewish people to bring this “universal relevance of Judaism” to all the people. We
all have to understand that the moral and environmental actions are not a supplement to our identity but the very essence
of our human, national and religious identity. The exodus will free all the people.
Contributed by Dror Bondi, a Chasid of Abraham Joshua Heschel and devoted to bring his thought to Israel. He wrote a
book and a dissertation on Heschel’s thought and translated the first Hebrew collection of Heschel’s articles. Dror lives
with his family in the Urban-Kibbutz Beit-Yisrael in Jerusalem and teaches Jewish thought at the Ein-Prat Academy.
-4-
————————————————————-
WE MUST LEARN TO BE SURPRISED, Dyonna Ginsburg
“An individual dies when they cease to be surprised. I am surprised every morning when I see the sunshine
again. When I see an act of evil I don’t accommodate, I don’t accommodate myself to the violence that goes
on everywhere. I am still so surprised! That is why I am against it. We must learn to be surprised.”
By most standards, Moses had proven himself a leader well before God chose to speak to him for the very first time.
Raised in the house of Pharaoh, Moses left the lap of luxury to see the suffering of the Hebrew slaves, his brethren, first-
hand. He stepped up to the plate when no one else did, intervening on behalf of the oppressed, Hebrew and Midianite
alike. He took on the challenge of mediating disputes between people of similar social standing, insisting that wrongdoing
must be addressed even in cases without clear-cut persecutors and victims. He risked his stature and his life to pursue
justice.
But, it wasn’t until Moses stopped to look at the burning bush that God chose him to lead the Jewish people out of Egypt
– “When the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush and said: Moses,
Moses (Exodus 3:3-4).” Explaining why Moses was worthy of a divine encounter, the midrashic compilation Tanhuma
states, “The Holy One blessed be He said to him [Moses]:
You took pains to see. [I swear] on your life that you are worthy of having me reveal myself to you.
”Early in his life, Moses actively went out and “saw pain” (Exodus 2:11). But, it is only later, when he “took pains to see,”
that God initiates contact. What was so special about Moses’ latter behavior?
First, Moses did not let his vision get in the way of his ability to see. Conventional wisdom dictates that leaders are those
with single-minded attention. They don’t get distracted. They keep their eye on the prize. But, such intense focus often
results in tunnel vision, limiting an ability to see and experience new things and perspectives. In contrast, by stopping
to look at the burning bush, Moses looked beyond himself and his concerns – no matter how lofty – and saw the world
panoramically.
Second, Moses was not jaded. A prolonged exposure to suffering can leave leaders, in general, and social change
activists, in particular, hardened. While remaining deeply committed to the larger cause, they lose the ability to see
individuals and their suffering. Moses, however, deemed one bush worthy of his attention; God, therefore, deemed Moses
worthy of His.
Third, Moses understood that oppression is insidious. When subjugation is embedded in a social and economic system, it
is easy to write it off as being part of the natural order. It’s tempting to claim: This is just the way things are. When Moses
looked at the burning bush, he first saw the what – “and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush
was not consumed.” Like most people, he accepted the burning bush at face value without asking questions. What made
Moses special is that he didn’t stop there. He turned around and proceeded to ask why – “And Moses said: I will turn aside now, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.”
Like a bush, Pharaoh’s reign appeared to be unscathed by the fire of tyranny raging from within. It took a Moses to understand
that such insidious tyranny can be extinguished only by doing a double-take and asking systemic questions.
Presumably, when God sees Moses stop to see, God sees and appreciates all these things in Moses. But, perhaps, most of
all, God sees and appreciates Moses unknowingly emulating God. Indeed, a mere few verses before Moses stops to see,
it is God who does so. “And it came to pass in the course of those many days that the king of Egypt died; and the children
of Israel sighed by reason of the bondage, and they cried… And God saw the children of Israel, and God took cognizance
of them (Exodus 2:23, 25).” By “learning to be surprised,” Moses walks in God’s footsteps.
Contributed by Dyonna Ginsberg, Director of Jewish Service Learning at The Jewish Agency for Israel and one of the
co-founders of the Siach Network.
-5-
———————————————————————–
ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE, Tess Lehrich
“Indifference to evil is worse than evil itself, that in a free society, some are guilty, but all are responsible.”
(From Reasons for My Involvement in the Peace Movement, 1972)
It seems like tales connected to the Jewish holidays are filled with easily identifiable villains in positions of power who
make it their mission to destroy or to exploit the Jewish people. Think of Antiochus who tried to suppress the Jewish law
and infiltrate the Temple with Greek influence, or Haman, the nasty advisor to King Ahasuerus who set out to exterminate
all of the Jews. These stories all highlight the actions of one man, yet in telling them, we often fail to acknowledge the
compliance of a whole kingdom of people who silently supported the rule of a tyrant. The story of Pesach is no different.
While we sit around the table and tell the tale of Pharaoh in Egypt, his strong hold over the Jewish slaves, and his repeated
refusal to “let our people go”, I encourage you to consider Heschel’s notion of indifference as it relates to this familiar
story. Of course, Pharaoh and his close advisors were the ones making real decisions which kept the Jews in slavery.
Yet all the people of Egypt, by accepting this behavior as the status quo and reveling in the benefits and freedoms that having
slaves enabled them, were responsible for this atrocity.
In the terms of Heschel, it may have been Pharaoh who was guilty, but all of the Egyptians were responsible for the wrong
doings against the Jewish slaves by doing nothing at all to change the situation. It seems like God must have agreed, when
he afflicted the ten plagues upon all the people of Egypt. If Pharaoh, as the king and ruler, was the only one responsible
for the slavery of the Jews, why not skip all the plagues and just go straight to killing the Pharaoh’s firstborn (sparing,
along the way, the firstborn of all the rest of the kingdom)?
Yet God rained down on all the people of Egypt with frogs and lice and cattle disease, all of which had far greater impact
on the citizens of the land than the Pharaoh himself, who was hiding safe in his palace. Although some versions of the Pesach
story reveal that after certain plagues, the citizens of Egypt begged the Pharaoh to let the Jews go free, as the familiar story
reveals, those who complied in the face of evil suffered the consequences of their inaction.
A similar story is unfolding in the world today, as we sit back and watch our environment collapse around us. We place
blame on oil tycoons and big businesses for acting on their personal interests above the interests of society. We agonize
as world leaders fail to come to any substantial agreement on regulating pollution and mitigating the impacts of climate
change. We point to those in power as the evil forces which put us in this terrible situation. We talk about efficiency as a
way of causing the least amount of harm while still allowing ourselves to live the privileged life which we have become
used to. While some of us take active roles in speaking and acting out against climate change, the majority of us are not
yet ready to talk about changing our consumption habits or taking any significant steps to improve our situation. As in the
story of Egypt, it will be all of us who drown in the sea chasing after our modern illusion of comfort.
In the name of Heschel, I urge you this year to consider the following notion; how far removed are we from the people of
Egypt who, satisfied with the status quo and their comfortable lifestyle, remained indifferent in the face of evil? How many
plagues of our own (increasing frequency and strength of hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and droughts) will it take until
we, too, cry for mercy to our leaders? We are a free society, and we are all responsible for our indifference in the face
of evil. As a people who has stood strong and risen above the forces of evil time and time again, it is our duty to take
responsibility and stand up against the indifference of modern society to today’s evil forces.
Contributed by Tess Lehrich, Resource Development Coordinator at the Heschel Center. She holds a Master’s degree in
environmental studies from the Porter School at Tel Aviv University.
– 6 -
———————————————————————————–
LIVING THE EXODUS LEGACY, Rabbi Or Rose
“At the first conference on religion and race, the main participants were Pharaoh and Moses. The outcome
of that summit meeting has not come to an end. Pharaoh is not ready to capitulate. The Exodus began, but
is far from having been completed.” – AJH
These were the words with which Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (1907-1972) opened his address at the
1963 National Conference on Race and Religion, in Chicago (“The Insecurity of Freedom,” p. 85).
It was at that same conference that Rabbi Heschel first met Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the keynote speaker at this
national gathering. The two became friends and allies working together for equality and justice, until king was cut down by an assassin’s bullet in the spring of 1968.
While these men came from very different backgrounds – Heschel from a Hasidic community in Poland, and King from
an African American Baptist community in Atlanta – they shared several qualities that brought them together during a
tumultuous and transformative time in American public life.
Both men came from prominent religious families and were groomed to take up the mantle of leadership of their
forebears.
Both were passionate believers in a God of compassion and righteousness, who called on humankind to serve
as co-creators of a world suffused with these values. Each turned to their sacred scriptures for inspiration and guidance,
allowing text and life to interpenetrate dynamically. And both were masterful at using their exegetical and linguistic skills,
as well as their charisma, to awaken people’s consciousness and stir them to action.
As one might expect, the Exodus narrative plays an important role in the speeches and writings of these great religious
leaders. In the quotation from Heschel cited above, he reminds us that the universal struggle for freedom is ongoing and
that the figures of Pharaoh and Moses remain important models in a world where far too many people still yearn for
liberation. In fact, in the very next sentence in his address Heschel further concretizes his message with the provocative
statement that “it was easier for the children of Israel to cross the Red Sea” than it was for many African Americans to
“cross certain university campuses.”
One powerful instance in which K ing made use of the Exodus narrative was in his final public address in Memphis, popularly
known as the “I’ve been to the Mountaintop” speech. In this now historic sermon, he describes with great passion the
gratitude he feels for all that he has witnessed in the development of the civil-rights movement over the previous decade.
As he winds down his speech, he compares himself to Moses standing on top of Mount Nebo on the edge of Canaan,
looking out over the Promised Land, knowing that he will not enter it with his people (Deuteronomy 34:1-4). With a new
set of death threats in the air, King speaks openly about own his mortality. “
Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place. but I’m not concerned about that now. I just want to do God’s will,”
King said. “I may not get there with you.But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land!”
Tragically, King was murdered the very next day.
In reflecting on the lives of king and Heschel, one of the many things I respect about these courageous men was their deep
dedication to their respective Christian and Jewish communities and their ability to learn from and work with people from
other religious and secular traditions for equality and justice. In fact, both understood their engagement in multifaith and
cross-cultural campaigns as necessary expressions of their particular religious commitments.
When Heschel returned from the Selma-Montgomery march, he wrote in his diary that walking with King and the other
civil-rights leaders evoked in him the same sense of the sacred he experienced as a child walking through the streets of
Warsaw with the great Hasidic masters in his family. And King, of course, spoke of the profound influence Mahatma Gandhi
had upon him as a Christian nonviolent activist.
As we gather around our Seder tables, reliving the pains and triumphs of our ancient ancestors in their march to freedom, let
us also pause briefly to reflect on the legacies of Abraham Joshua Heschel and Martin Luther King Jr., two great modern
advocates of compassion and justice. May their memories continue to inspire and agitate, awakening us to the challenges
and possibilities of freedom today.
*This reflection is adapted from an earlier blog post from ON Scripture: The Torah Contributed by Rabbi Or Rose,
founding Director of The Center for Global Judaism at Hebrew College (Newton, MA).
– 7 -
——————————————————————————
EVIL HAS A CONTEXT, Dr. Eilon Schwartz
Not so unlike Egypt of old, Abraham Joshua Heschel was born into a slavery of sorts, the moral nightmare of what
became Nazi Germany, and had his own exodus in 1938 from Fascist Europe, to London and eventually the United
States. But the Jewish people had no savior, no hand that led them out of Egypt. Heschel’s mother was murdered by
the Nazis; two of his sisters died in concentration camps – three of the six million.
As the nightmare’s scope began to be revealed, Heschel wrote an extraordinary essay titled “The Meaning of This War”,
published in February 1944, before D-Day, before liberation was ensured.
Let Fascism not serve as an alibi for our conscience. We have failed to fight for right, for justice, for goodness; as a result
we must fight against wrong, against injustice, against evil. We have failed to offer sacrifices on the altar of peace;
now we must offer sacrifices on the altar of war.
Evil has a context, Heschel tells us. And that context inevitably leads back to us.
Good and evil were perhaps never so clear as at that moment. There was nothing simpler than to see Hitler as a monster.
But Heschel, who experienced the nightmare in the most personal of ways at that very moment, refuses to surrender to
convenient narratives, and urges us to understand that evil emerges from somewhere. Where right, justice and goodness
have been eclipsed, where poverty and despair and indignity have flourished, evil will appear. Heschel leaves it to us to imagine
what our culpability is for the horrors of Europe. Few are guilty, Heschel teaches us, but all are responsible.
Too easily we turn the complexity of our world into neat dichotomies of good and evil, truth and power. We see wrong in
other’s actions and deeds, not in our own sins of omission and commission. But Egypt, we are taught, is neither a one-
time historical reality, nor simply the triumph of good over evil. Egypt is everywhere, always. There is evil, which, when
emerging, must be combated.
But there is the breeding ground for evil, all around us; the great and subtle inequities and insults, which fester and threaten
to break loose, in so many directions. Heschel’s courage, his moral audacity, was to remind us, at the darkest of moments,
how we are all connected, and how we can be, must be, agents for change.
Contributed by Dr. Eilon Schwartz, founder of the Heschel Center along with Dr. Jeremy Benstein in 1994 and Executive
Director until 2012. He is currently the head of Shaharit: Creating Common Cause, a think-tank he established with the aim
of generating a new vision for Israeli society.
– 8 -
————————————————————
TO PRAY IS A DREAM, Rabbi Gideon D. Sylvester.
“To pray is to dream in league with God, to envision His holy visions”
It’s easy to attend a synagogue service, but far harder to pray with passion. Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel who grew
up with the intense prayers of a Hassidic court was withering in his criticism of the synagogues of his day which he
described as, “the graveyards where prayer is buried”, he was equally damning about the rabbis whom he described as
“page-boys” because instead of inspiring their communities with deep scholarship and fervor, all they did was call out
page numbers to communities who had no idea how to follow a service, let alone pray meaningfully.
Turning prayer into a profound experience can be hard, but in describing how we should conduct ourselves at the Seder,
the Mishna offers us some important ideas. It begins by explaining that as we tell the story of the exodus, we should begin
with a dismal and disgraceful story of the Israelites servitude and idolatry, building to a crescendo of joy telling how God
brought us to freedom and enlightenment. This story should take on a personal note as each of us identifies with the narrative
of the Seder:
In every generation, a person should regard himself as if he himself came out of Egypt, for it is written, “It is because of
that the Lord did for me when I came out of Egypt.”
This pattern is underlined in the passage Arami oved avi – (My father was a wandering Aramean) in which we tell
the story of the exodus first hand through the eyes of a Jewish farmer living in Israel and bringing his first fruits to the
Temple. Immediately after this, we sing of praise to God which the Mishna tells us should emerge from a genuine sense of
personal of redemption from the brutal slavery of Egypt and thanksgiving that we can participate in the journey to the ultimate
redemption.
Therefore, (because of this powerful experience we have described) we are bound to give thanks, to praise, to glorify, to
honor, to exalt to extol and to bless he who made all these miracles for our fathers and for us. He brought us out from
slavery to freedom, from sorrow to gladness, from mourning to a festival day and from darkness to great light and from
servitude to redemption, so let us say before him Halleluiah.
Finally praise is interrupted by the meal and the powerful moment when, we open the door for Elijah who will usher in
the Messianic age – the time when there is no more suffering and injustice and a new era of justice and loving kindness
begins.
The seder, its story and its prayers invite us to remember past suffering, to experience the sense of redemption. It calls
on us to imagine and build a world of spirituality and justice. In this magical vision, prayer can no longer be a dry ritual.
Prayer becomes a genuine outpouring of emotion; of gratitude and hope for the future. “To pray is to dream in league
with God, to envision His holy visions”.
Contributed by Rabbi Gideon Sylvester, the British United Synagogue’s Rabbi in Israel and director of the education
program for the Jerusalem branch of the Rene Cassin Fellowship in Judaism and Human Rights. He was formerly Director
of the Beit Midrash for Human Rights at the Hillel House of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
– 9 -
==================================================== ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 9th, 2013
Since my return to Vienna about ten days ago, I witnessed the Erdogan negation at the Hofburg of the UN tooted Alliance of Civilizations but found two activities at the renovated Nestroyhof in Leopoldstadt – or Vienna’s ever multicultural former village – now the city’s second district that you cross on the way to the Vienna International Center (VIC) – home of the UN offices in Vienna (UNOV). Because of this I decided to dedicate a posting to the history of a theater in this area – no less – “THE PLACE” – HAMAKOM. Leopoldstadt
1020 Vienna, Austria. Leopoldstadt, Vienna and Brooklyn, New York are Sister-Districts like Sister-Cities – Both districts with large Jewish minorities in their history – in cities with powerful Jewish minorities at some point in their evolution – in Vienna it belongs rather to a glorious past-destroyed – that today’s city-hall is trying to revive. Jews that immigrated rather recently from East Europe reside in the Second District, while the remnant of the old timer, sand their descendants, live now in New York, and all over the world, and started to come back on visits – choosing hotels in the 2nd district.
————————————— HISTORY of a VIENNA Second District THEATER at the NESTROYHOF the HAMAKOM.
Stormy Years 1898 – 1938 On the ground floor of the Nestroyhof, an Art Nouveau rental building, designed and built in 1898 by Theodor Herzl’s friend and Zionist supporter, Viennese architect Oskar Marmorek, opened first the „Etablissement Nestroy-Säle“. The „Mazzes Insel“ (matzah island), long a Jewish residential and business district, was turn-of-the-century heart of a new epoch of Jewish theater. Yiddish language ensembles, cabarets and small theaters sprung up bringing the Jewish life of Vienna and Eastern Europe to the stage. Here they confronted the Viennese Kasperl (Punch & Judy) and Viennese Posse (Vaudeville) traditions, initiating a totally new style of theater, a multi-cultural counterpart to mainstream culture. The Theater in the Nestroyhof, became a potpourri showplace of a wide variety of theater groups and styles, contributing greatly to the internationality of modern metropolitan life in Vienna. After the „Etablissement Nestroy-Säle“ filed for bankruptcy the Varieté theater „Folies Comiques“ opened its portals, presenting among others, Karl Kraus’ “Trianon” theatre troupe with the Austrian premiere performance of Franz Wedekind’s „Pandora’s Box“. Later, Theater “Reklame” added a cinema in a further tract of the building and a bar („Tanzbar Sphinx“) opened in the theater’s cellar. The bar and cinema remained in business until the fall of Stalingrad in 1942. From 1904 to 1918 the „Intimes Theater“, a small literary theater led by Emil Richter-Roland and Oscar Friedmann produced Austrian premieres of Gorki, Strindberg, and Maeterlinck and later French comedies produced by Emil’s wife Josefine. Performances in the Nestroyhof were periodically forbidden by state censors during political crises. Jakob Goldfliess led the „Jüdische Künstlerspiele“ in Nestroyhof from 1927 – 1938, and as anti-Jewish restrictions grew increasingly focused his program on themes of anti-Semitism. He presented famous Yiddish language actors and ensembles and touring groups such as the „Jüdisch-Akademischen Theaters“ from Moscow, the “Budapestern” and the Hebrew language “Habima”. Lost Years 1938 – 1997 In 1938 the „Jüdische Künstlerspiele“, along with the rest of the Viennese and European Jewish theater world, fell victim to Nazi persecution. The property was aryanized in 1940 (Arianization is the genteel word used for stealing Jewish property, or applying pressure to get it for ridiculously low prices in parallel with seeing the Jews disappear), and taken over by the industrialist Polsterer family. Restitution procedures in 1956 led to a, today still debated, out of court, settlement between the descendants of the building’s rightful owner, Anna Stein, and the Polsterer family, who still maintain possession of the property today. The war-damaged building was renovated in 1955 and the onetime theater space served a succession of commercial tenants, most recently housing a supermarket until 1997. Upon their vacating of the premises, the drop ceiling and plasterboard walls installed in adapting it for commercial use were removed, revealing the magnificent theater structure hidden below. Ironically this temporary misuse of the theater led ultimately to its preservation. Rediscovery of the Theater 2004-2007 Rediscovery inspired a row of cultural initiatives in attempts to re-establish the theater in the Nestroyhof as a cultural and artistic center. Theater groups and cultural organizations presented performances, art exhibitions and events dealing with themes of Diaspora, racism and social exclusion. The unclear situation of tenancy, lack of direction and inconsistent profile made long-term planning impossible. Towards the end of 2007, the Polsterer family was again setting sights on the theater’s commercial value and on halting all cultural activities in the space. New Initiative 2008 A new privately funded initiative by theater director Frederic Lion (who’s Theater Transit, staged, et. al., the production „Abendfüllend“ by Antonio Fian, in 2006 in Nestroyhof), begun in May 2008, managed to obtain an open-ended lease, thus saving the space from an imminent return to misappropriate commercial use. Under the direction of Frederic Lion, the group Theater Nestroyhof Hamakom developed a concept for the total use of the space and its long term reactivation within the Viennese theater landscape. This concept won the support of the city of Vienna’s Cultural Bureau for September 2009 to December 2013. The initiative is working towards the realization of a lasting and necessary restoration of the theater structure.
Conception The history of the Theater in the Nestroyhof has been a century of repeated contestation of its right of existence. Even in its current fragile condition, scarred by abuse, deterioration and destruction, the theater space contains a spirit and energy which inspires artists with confidence, strength and fantasy. Its tragic heritage and historical grandeur, aesthetic and spatial presence reveal a topos, awakening enthusiasm and fantasy in searching for traces of the past and recounting stories of the present. Under the direction of Frederic Lion and his team, the Theater Nestroyhof Hamakom has chosen this location in the urban village of Vienna’s second district as a performance platform for social friction, diverse fields of thought and movements happening in Vienna and anywhere. The projects will be aligned along the fissures of the current global human and cultural interaction and movement, exclusion and delimitation, remembrance and identity, flight and asylum. The place, Theater Nestroyhof, in all its manifestations, real and imagined, is not a spiritual ghetto; as for every theater, its strength has always lain in its limitless ability to free itself. The Nestroyhof name, with its longstanding tradition, has been embellished by the Hebrew word “ha makom”, meaning “the place.” This expression includes a transcendental form of remembrance and spiritual localization that inspires an exciting pursuit of possibilities to expand and abolish existing borders. ______________________ TEAM Direction Production, office management Dramaturgy
Contact ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 7th, 2013 Artistic ambassador
Rita rocks the UNIranian-born Israeli singer performs in Hebrew, English, and Persian at first-of-its-kind ‘Tunes for Peace’ concertBy Times of Israel staff March 6, 2013, 3:28 am
Rita with Ambassador Ron Prosor, and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and his wife, March 5 (photo credit: Shahar Azran)
Related TopicsIranian-born Israeli diva Rita performed before UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and other international dignitaries Tuesday at the UN General Assembly Hall in a first-of-its-kind event organized by the Israeli Mission to the UN. ![]() Israeli singer Rita performs at the United Nations on Tuesday, March 5 (photo credit: image capture unwebtv) Rita and her nine-piece band performed in Hebrew, English and Persian before a full house that included UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, President of the UN General Assembly Vuk Jeremic, ambassadors, diplomats, and leaders of the US Jewish and Iranian communities. The concert featured songs based on Jewish scripture, Iranian poetry and Rita’s own compositions. Many of them appear on her latest album, “My Joys.”
“My mother taught me the love for music while she was cooking in the kitchen,” said the Tehran-born singer. “Two years ago I was urged to record the Persian songs that were the soundtrack of my life.”
“During the whole recording process, I couldn’t stop smiling because I came to realize I was celebrating my life. I was celebrating being both Iranian and Israeli that found expression in music. Tonight, I invite you to celebrate it with me,” she said.
“The music of this room isn’t always harmonious — our mission tonight is to change that,” said Israel’s envoy to the UN Ron Prosor. “Our goal is to weave a tapestry of music as rich and diverse as the UN itself.”
Prosor joked that it was a lifetime dream of his to one day be a warm-up act for Rita at a major New York venue. The ambassador disclosed his own love for music, saying he used to be part of a chorus and claiming that people sometimes mistake him for opera singer Luciano Pavarotti. “These days, however, I spend much more time composing speeches for the Security Council than music,” he joked. “Tonight I encourage you to get on your feet and sing along.” ![]() Rita is congratulated by Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Ron Prosor at the end of her UN performance, March 5 (photo credit: Shahar Azran) Rita Jahan-Foruz was born in Tehran, Iran, 50 years ago. In 1970, at the age of eight, she migrated with her family to Israel, where she grew up listening to her mother sing melodies in her native Farsi.
Fifteen years later, Rita burst onto the Israeli music scene as a one-named wonder — Israel’s Madonna, or Cher, if you will — and has gone on to become one of the country’s top recording artists and most recognized celebrities.
She was chosen to sing the national anthem in 1998 at the country’s main jubilee celebration, answering a personal plea from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Ten years later, as Israel marked its 60th anniversary, she was chosen as Israel’s top female singer ever.
Still, she stayed close to her Iranian roots. Some 250,000 Israelis are of Iranian descent. Rita is perhaps the most famous of all.
In Iran, fans are exposed to her music mostly through foreign-based Farsi-language satellite TV. During a recent tour of eight music dealers in Tehran, an AP correspondent found two selling a Rita single, “Gole Sangam,” a remake of a famous Iranian song about yearning for a missing loved one.
Meir Javedanfar, an Iranian-born analyst who teaches at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel, said Rita’s popularity is hard to gauge, but it’s possible that her Israeli identity has helped lure listeners fed up with the hard-line Iranian government. “Whatever popularity she might have could be related to artistic capabilities. It could also be related to the backlash we see in Iran against the government,” he said.
AP contributed to this report ================================================== by Chemi Shalev
Israeli singer Rita a hit at UN General AssemblyUN Ambassador Prosor has pulled off one of the most unusual diplomatic achievements ever: a full-fledged UN-sponsored Farsi-Hebrew musical event full of goodwill and sympathy towards Israel.By Chemi Shalev | Mar.06, 2013 | 9:50 AM
Rita performing in front of the United Nations in New York City Photo by AP
this story is by Chemi Shalev
Inside the hall of the General Assembly at the United Nations building in New York, it seemed at times that either the messiah had arrived or the world had turned inside-out Bizarro, like in the Superman comics: Rita, one of Israel’s most popular performers, was singing in Farsi and Hebrew; Israelis were dancing in the aisles: diplomats from around the world were clapping and begging for more; Israeli Ambassador Ron Prosor was the hero of the day; Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said “shalom” and General Assembly President Vuk Jeremic, it turned out, hails from a family of Righteous Gentiles. It was, without a doubt, a night to remember, a memory to cherish, an Israeli-made spectacle the likes of which hadn’t been seen in the General Assembly since Ambassador Herzog tore apart that Zionism is Racism resolution in 1975. Only this time, it was the other way around: “Why is this night different than all other nights?” an elated and season conscious Prosor asked me, “Because on this night, contrary to all previous nights, the United Nations is united behind Israel and resides under the wings of Rita.” The wings that Prosor was referring to come from Haim Bialik’s song “Hachnisini Tahat Knafech” – “Under Your Wing” – a popular Israeli song which was featured in Rita’s “Tunes for Peace” concert performed at UN headquarters Tuesday night. The famous platform underneath the giant olive-colored UN symbol was turned into a rock concert stage, including a smoke machine, strobe lights, and a rocking and raucous 9-piece ensemble that played Persian-Israeli music with light touches of Klezmer to boot. The auditorium, which for most Israelis and Diaspora Jews has come to be associated with harsh anti-Israeli rhetoric, cold diplomatic isolation, and humiliating political defeats at the hands of the “automatic majority,” suddenly had a warm ambiance and an admiring audience comprised of Iranian expatriates, Israeli diplomats, UN employees, and representatives of 140 UN delegations who begged their Israeli colleagues for invitations to the show and to the experience. ![]() Rita performing in front of United Nations in New York CityAP
Prosor came upon the idea for the UN concert when he saw Rita perform in New York in Farsi and in Hebrew seven months ago. He lobbied Ban Ki Moon and Jeremic until he secured their agreement, but then had to ward off countless attempts by UN Secretariat workers to scuttle the concert for fear that “it would set a precedent” or that it would upset other delegations. Having removed the last remaining obstacles, Prosor fixed the date for the concert with Rita after sponsorships had been secured from the LA-based Y&S Nazarian Family Foundation, the Iranian American Jewish Federation of New York, and the UJA Federation of NY. Ban Ki Moon opened the evening with the word “shalom” and described Rita as “a cultural ambassador”. Then came Jeremic, who announced that he would soon be the first sitting President of the General Assembly to visit Israel, during which he will participate in a Yad Vashem ceremony in which members of his grandmother’s family in Belgrade would be recognized as “Righteous Among the Gentiles” for saving Jews during the Holocaust. Then, Introducing Rita, Prosor said “I always hoped that I would one day be the opening act for Rita at a major venue in New York City. Although, I’ll admit, I never expected that it would be in the form of the Three Tenors: “Ban, Prosor, and Jeremic.” “It is our sincere hope that this musical evening will echo from New York to the hearts and minds of people throughout Israel and Iran,” Prosor added, and then asked Rita to “rock the house”, which she did. The popular Israeli singer gave a ten song rendition that included five songs in Farsi, four in Hebrew and one – “Time for Peace” – in English. She delighted the audience with stories of her childhood in Tehran, about her mother’s love for music, and about her own wish to spread the love far and wide between her birthplace and her homeland. Her strong voice reverberated in the hall which had never seen such a joyous bunch of Israelis, including enthusiastic Rita fans who tried to get the UN diplomats to dance with them near the stage and down the aisles, though that proved a bridge too long for the usually stiff and formal envoys. There was a lot of hype and gimmick in the evening, for sure, and it is bound to be used and even abused for hasbara purposes – but most of the crowd, it seemed, left the building with genuine smiles on their faces. Everyone sensed that it was a unique evening, with the UN, of all forums, providing such a warm and hospitable venue for such an iconic Israeli singer with such a positive message, no Palestinians or politics included. Even jaded journalists like the one writing this report were moved, knowing that they had witnessed an event that had never been seen before, at least from an Israeli point of view, and is unlikely to be seen over and over again for a very long time. =========================================== THOSE TWO ARTICLES ARE FROM ISRAEL BUT WE DID NOT FIND AN ARTICLE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES AND WONDER WHY. AFTER ALL MOST OF THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WERE NEW YORKERS. OH WELL – THIS MIGHT BE FOR THE WEEKEND EDITION.
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 6th, 2013 New York Music DailyGlobal Music With a New York Edge
rita un reviewnewyorkmusicdaily.wordpress.com/t… March 6, 2013Rita Shifts the Paradigm at the United Nations“Only dreamers can do changes in the world,” Israeli rock star Rita reminded the crowd as she exited the stage after an exhilarating, politically radical, hourlong set for a private audience seemingly composed of dignitaries, their guests and a scattering of media at the United Nations General Assembly hall last night. Her English may have been slightly fractured, but she left no doubt in the tone of her voice. Rita is as big in Israel as Madonna was at the peak of her popularity here in the US; she is just as popular in Iran. Her dream: peace in the Middle East. On one hand, the pressure on her to cave in to partisan politics must be enormous, especially for someone whose family escaped a brutally repressive regime in her native Iran for the democracy of Israel when she was eight. On the other hand, she refuses to give up on that dream. Last night marked the historic occasion that a performer had ever sung in both Persian and Hebrew on the same night at the UN, but it also might have been the first time that anyone ever spoke those two languages side by side in public there. To see ten Israelis onstage singing lustily in Persian – the langauge of their country’s sworn enemy – was radical to the extreme. And this was with the blessing of the Israeli ambassador, who acceded that it had always been his “dream to open for Rita,” and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who described Rita as “A reminder of the role of music to transcend cultures, build bridges and connect people. Instead of global hegemony, global harmony!”
And the audience ate it up! They seemed to know all the words, whether or in Persian or Hebrew, sang along, and by the end of the show there was a lively circle of dancers gathered at the front of the stage. This wasn’t some small posse of peaceniks from the kibbutz hanging out in a cramped Tel Aviv basement: the auditorium was packed with a mainstream, monied Israeli crowd. Nor was the music bland, tepid pop: in Israel, Rita may be top 40, but her band’s closest American musical equivalent is Gogol Bordello. Laughable as it may seem, from an American perspective, to imagine such a cutting-edge, haunting blend of Middle Eastern folk themes and epic art-rock as Rita plays getting airplay on commercial radio, it’s an everyday thing in Israel. That general, mainstream listeners would not only accept but embrace this music makes the idea of dropping bombs on the people of Israel, or the people of Iran, all the more repulsive. Rita self-effacingly hinted more than once that she would have liked to be singing something other than love songs, but it didn’t matter: her message couldn’t have been more clear, or vividly shared.
About the music: it was brilliant. The concert began with a long, plaintively crescendoing improvisation played by Mark Eliyahu on the Persian kamancheh fiddle over an ominous keyboard drone – this is not how Madonna starts her shows. It finally picked up with a lush majesty over a swaying dance beat and in a split second the crowd was clapping along. The show ended with Yeladem Zim Sincha (Children Are a Joy), a feral gypsy-rock romp completely at odds with its saccharine title, the band exploding out of a biting Galia Hai viola solo midway through. In between, Rita alternated between her Hebrew-language hits and the vintage Iranian songs on her most recent album My Joys. The most exhilarating solo moment of the night belonged to Jonathan Dror, playing shivery microtones on a genuine rams-horn shofar on the introduction to Hachnisini Tachat Knafech (Under Your Wing), Rita adding her own spine-tingling, chromatically-charged vocalese solo. She gave energetic vocal cameos to rapidfire accordionist Ariel Alaev and eclectically fiery guitarist Ofer Koren; Dror also energized the crowd with his dance moves late in the set. The biggest hit with the crowd, predictably, was Shah Doomad (The Groom King), an ecstatic but rather ferocious wedding song: this guy is something to be reckoned with! To paraphrase what Edward Said said long ago, there is no discrete, exclusionary Middle Eastern culture: there is only Orientalism. As Rita made defiantly clear, it is possible to be both pro-Israel and pro-Iran: we are all in this together, with her. And who wouldn’t want to be? ======————————————————======== News for Rita at the UN
——————————————————————————————————————
Rita with Ambassador Ron Prosor, and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and his wife, March 5 (photo credit: Shahar Azran)
VIDEO OF UN PHOTO OP AT THE END OF THE CONCERT – by Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN ![]() Hi Pincas. So far I’ve put up this outtake video: ————————————————————————————————————— Rita is congratulated by Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Ron Prosor at the end of her UN performance, March 5 (photo credit: Shahar Azran)
————————————————————————————————————- and our own older announcement: SustainabiliTank: UPDATED: RITA – the Iranian-Israeli cultural …www.sustainabilitank.info/…/rita-the-iranian-israeli-cultural-tre…
Feb 22, 2013 – Matthew writes: Israel Plans UN Concert by Iranian-Born Singer Rita, … the Viva Vox choir, invited to perform a concert at the UN by General … and even earlier -
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 6th, 2013 THE ISRAELI MISSION MAKES HISTORY AT THE UN WITH A CONCERT BY ISRAELI POP ICON RITA, SINGING IN BOTH PERSIAN AND HEBREW FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER IN THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY HALL.
by Irith Jawetz, reporting from the UN Headquarters in New York. On March 5, 2013 the Permanent Mission of Israel to the UN has hosted a special event and first of its kind in the UN General Assembly hall – a concert by the world-renowned Israeli-Iranian singer Rita Yahan-Farouz. The performance was titled “Tunes for Peace” . Among the attendees were Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, General Assembly President Vuk Jeremic, ambassadors, celebrities, and Jewish and Iranian community leaders. H.E. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon was the first to speak and he started his speech by greeting everybody with the Hebrew word “Shalom”. He said there is no room like this one and it serves to seek peace among nations, preserve Human rights, but sometimes also for concerts. He praised Rita for her desire to reach many cultures through her music, connect people and he hopes this concert will inspire people to strive for peace, justice and Human rights. He thanked the Government of Israel and especially Ambassador Rom Prosor for enabling this important event.
The next speaker was H.E. Mr. Vuk Jeremic, President of the 67th Session of the UN General Assembly. He also thanked Ambassador Prosor and mentioned his personal special friendship with the Ambassador. He announced that he will be going to Israel soon and will be visiting Yad Vashem, since a few members of his family, who saved Jews during the Holocaust will be honored as righteous among Nations. This announcement brought a huge applause from the audience. He mentioned that music has a very important tool for connecting people and nations since biblical times. Music is a universal language and he shares Rita’s hopes that it will bring cooperation between nations. After the speeches the General Assembly Hall transformed completely and the concert began. Rita came on stage and the audience welcomed her with huge applause. She has a terrific personality and projected it throughout the whole evening. The album, which has received widespread international acclaim, interweaves the Iranian melodies of Rita’s childhood with the rich tapestry of contemporary Israeli music. She introduced herself by saying that she was born in Tehran and emigrated with her parents at the age of eight. She credited her mother for her remarkable singing career by telling us that her mother used to sing the whole day long, even while cooking or doing chores around the house. The concert lasted about an hour and brought the hall to its feet. The audience definitely following Ambassador Proser’s closing words in his speech ”Let’s Rock the Hall”.
Let us all hope that politicians will follow Rita’s example! =============================================
Some of our older postings on RITA in NEW YORK: SustainabiliTank: UPDATED: RITA – the Iranian-Israeli cultural …www.sustainabilitank.info/…/rita-the-iranian-israeli-cultural-tre…
Feb 22, 2013 – Matthew writes: Israel Plans UN Concert by Iranian-Born Singer Rita, … the Viva Vox choir, invited to perform a concert at the UN by General … SustainabiliTank: RITA from Israel, last Sunday night at the Town …www.sustainabilitank.info/…/rita-from-israel-last-sunday-night…
Nov 14, 2012 – RITA from Israel, last Sunday night at the Town Hall in New York City, … Such as In 2006, Rita put on a show called One (in English) which ran … ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 23rd, 2013
Purim and the Evolution of JudaismAuthor:Share this Article – www.algemeiner.com/2013/02/22/purim-and-the-evolution-of-judaism/Amalek First Diaspora Jewish celebrations Jewish Fasts Jewish Holidays Jews in Persia Paschal Lamb Purim Persia Shapatu Torah Festivals
Esther and Mordechai writing the second letter of Purim.Oil on canvas, 1685. RISD Museum of Art, Rhode Island. It always amazes me how Judaism has succeeded in evolving (or shall we say, for the sake of political correctness, reinvigorating itself). After all, the Bible took orgiastic pagan harvest festivals and turned them into disciplined, monotheistic family celebrations. Shapatu, the Mesopotamian Seventh Day, was transformed from an evil day of fear and bad luck into one of rest and spirituality. The people of Ugarit boiled a kid in its mother’s milk, while we wait six hours between meat and milk (or insist on two sets of dishes, fridges, ovens, dishcloths, tablecloths, dentures, and toothpicks). But I still can’t believe that Moses could ever have imagined his descendants would one day return to the Land Flowing with Milk and Honey to turn it into a land swamped with long black coats and fur hats speaking a variation of “Dog German”. But, as the good book of Psalms says, “How amazing are your works, God, and they are all wise!” No sooner had Moses and Joshua been called to the Heavenly Assembly, when we Israelites returned to our natural bolshie, argumentative, and contrarian personification of a “stiff-necked people”. Despite the optimistic aspirations of Isaiah and the desperate Jeremiads of guess who, and with the exception of one or two decent monarchs, we descended into corruption, chaos, defeat, and exile. The horrific conquest and destruction described by the Book of Lamentations is obvious enough reason for the state of depression that enveloped us as we “sat by the waters of Babylon and there we wept”. By the time we got to the prophet Zechariah, Judaism had instituted a range of depressing fasts, in the fourth month, the fifth, the seventh, and the tenth month (though we can’t be certain which ones they were, because the names of the months were constantly changing from Canaanite to Babylonian to Persian and more). Not only, but according to the Talmud we were fasting at the drop of a hat whenever something went wrong, the rains failed, the hurricanes blew, the lions roared, the jackals howled, or yet another invading army passed through. The mood was dark. Our land was laid waste and we became a nation of expatriates. So think how amazing it is that after all those visions of valleys of dried bones, all of a sudden our religion bequeaths us a celebration to surpass all celebrations, a carnival of food drink and fancy dress. Again I ask, could Moses have ever envisioned a celebration that started in the warmth of Persian indulgence transported into the driving sleet of Manchester, the cold rain of London, or the snow ravaged suburbs of New England? No wonder getting drunk seemed to be the only way to get through the day. Yet the wisdom of our forefathers was not simply in giving us an opportunity to have fun and let our hair down (if you were a male and forgot to shave your head to the scalp). Even in the moments of our inebriated self-indulgence we were commanded to think of the poor, to cement friendships, and give presents. It is an amazing tribute to our forefathers that they knew how to find that golden rule, that balance between self-indulgence and altruism, between individuality and community, between enjoying God’s gifts and making sure we shared them with others. That, after all, was our very first celebration as a nation. The Paschal Lamb was eaten together with the stranger or the loner and was welcomed into the warmth of the home. So from the start the family, eating and rejoicing, became the center point of our religious life. Nowadays in modern and free materialist living, the idea of family comes under assault everywhere and in every form. Families no longer sit down to eat together, or if they do it is in front of the television. Mothers walk their babies as they talk into their cellphones or sit on park benches texting, and never even look at their offspring, let alone communicate with them. The conflicting and concurrent demands of modern life pull one parent to work, the other to the store, one child to sport, the other to a mall; even when they do come back, they each retire to their pads, phones, boxes, and screens to enter their own private worlds. How wise of our founders to focus on sitting down together to have a religious meal, to drink and be merry, to talk about lofty ideas, and encourage children to present some stimulating or original thought. We have always been adding, adapting and adjusting as circumstances and history have changed. There’s one point about Purim that I don’t think is stressed enough. The Jews of the Persian Empire were very careful to avoid offending and above all not to be seen benefiting from the discomfort of their enemies. They did not loot or take advantage (though Esther did get Haman’s palace). I wish nowadays more of us took that to heart. Swindling the State has almost become a national pastime in some quarters. Purim reminds us of the dangers of life but also the pleasures. One can so quickly turn into the other. We are commanded to be so spaced out on Purim that we cannot tell the difference between “Blessed is Haman” and “Cursed is Mordechai”. If I may suggest some relevant adaptations; between an outwardly religious Jew who behaves like a pagan and a pagan who behaves more morally than a Jew, and between a Jew who says he is a Jew and one who really behaves like one! We have survived despite the continuing presence of Amalek in various disguises. And we have survived despite the fact that we are often our own worst enemies. So let’s drink to survival. Happy Purim. ========================================= Rabbi Michael Lerner of Tikkun – Purim Wisdom Explaining the deeper meaning of this holiday! Purim Wisdom: Explaining the Deeper Meaning of this Jewish Holiday which begins Saturday night, Feb. 23*You can read this online at: ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 22nd, 2013 ON FEBRUARY 4, 2013 WE POSTED THE FIRST INFORMATION ABOUT THIS FIRST-OF-A-KIND PEACE EVENT AT THE UN.
On March 5, 2013 the Permanent Mission of Israel to the UN will host a special event in the UN General Assembly hall – a concert by the Israeli-Iranian singer Rita. Among the attendees will be Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, General Assembly President Vuk Jeremic, ambassadors, celebrities, and Jewish and Iranian community leaders. Rita will sing some of her greatest hits in Persian, Hebrew and English, and songs from her childhood in Tehran. Her Persian album, My Joys, was an international smash hit, and created a large fan base for Rita in her native Iran. ————————————————————————————- Our comment: Please note that the concert happens at a time that Iran and Israel are in the news, US Secretary of State John Kerry and then US President Barack Obama go to the Middle East, an important attempt at finding a solution of conflict with Iran goes on in Kazakhstan, and elections for a new President of Iran are in the works as well. In Israel the time is running out for the formation of a new government. Rather then insults – what will be heard at the General Assembly Great Hall at the UN will be music of love at a time of spring and renewal. ================================================== OUR ORIGINAL POSTING OF FEBRUARY 4th READ: “RITA – the Iranian-Israeli cultural treasure to appear at the UN in the run-up to Nowruz 1392 (2013); if the UN is ready to gather courage this could melt Middle East ice. As the media gets these news – there will be many updates.” Last November we wrote with enthusiasm about RITA’s performance at the New York City Town Hall. Now, from Matthew Russell Lee at the UN we learned that in March she will appear at the UN – in the great Assembly Hall of the UN General Assembly. I can already see with the eyes of my mind how people will dance in their seats, and if possible all over the sides of the Hall. ‘Nowruz’, “New Day” in Persian, is the name of the Iranian New Year; it marks the beginning of the corresponding traditional celebrations in Iranian calendars. An Iranian Spring that this year will coincide with the start of the election process of a new Iranian President that will replace Mr. Ahmadi-Nejad. A beginning of a new year, marked by the first day of spring that comes with the equinox! It is celebrated by the different Iranian peoples and the related cultural continent. These celebrations have also spread to many other parts of the world, including parts of Central Asia, South Asia, Northwestern China, the Crimea and some groups in the Balkans. In 2009, Norwuz was registered on the UNESCO List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity – here we start talking real politics wrapping up our best hopes. Also, important to remember that UNESCO has its Palestinian Statehood difficulties and here a chance to show a positive side. Nowruz 2013 – Islamic year 1392 – this year’s celebration falls on Thursday, 21 March 2013 – or just 45 days from now. It seems that the Israelis and the UN will set March 5th as the date for RITA’s appearance at the UN – whatever – this will be clearly in the run-up to Nowruz.Would it not be nice to see in this an Iranian Spring at the UN or if you wish an Iranian-Israeli love fest? My mind starts swirling like that of a Derwish. Will the UN for once step up to its goals? Rita, who came with her parents from Tehran in Iran to Ashkelon in Israel – is bi-cultural and while an openly declared treasure in Israel – surely as well a hidden treasure in Iran. Will the UN have the courage needed to have her build bridges with her appearance on the UN stage? ———- Matthew writes: Israel Plans UN Concert by Iranian-Born Singer Rita, March 5, 2013 Showdown By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive UNITED NATIONS, February 1, 2013 — With the UN on edge over Israel’s air strike on Syria and possible reactions not only from Damascus but Tehran, Inner City Press has learned of a planned Israeli-sponsored concert slated for March 5, by Iranian-born singer Rita Jahanforuz. The concert, sources tell Inner City Press, has already occasioned controversy in the UN. The concerns only grew when the Viva Vox choir, invited to perform a concert at the UN by General Assembly President Vuk Jeremic, ended with the controversial song “March on the Drina.” Then, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman Martin Nesirky if the Secretariat had provided any financial support. The first day the answer was “no.” The next day at least $26,000 for “technical support” was disclosed (that is for the Serbian event I assume). Sources tell Inner City Press that while the UN Department of Public Information will now assist with Israel’s Rita concert, initially it was suggested to the Israeli Mission that they try for sponsorship from UNESCO. While some laughed at this — since Palestine was voted in as a member of UNESCO, the US cut its funding — others saw it as potentially savvy, a way for UNESCO to change its image. Be that as it may, the concert is now slated with some DPI support for March 5; preparation and coordination meetings have begun. It would be difficult to postpone it, as the General Assembly Hall where it is to be held will be closing down in April for renovation. How will Iran, Syria and others react? ——– We think that bringing it closer to March 21st would have made the timing pinpointed, but having it ahead of the spring revival is just OK and the event will be a multi-level eye-opener nevertheless. Thank you Matthew for bringing this to our attention. Please see our previous article about RITA: Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on November 14th, 2012 ========================================================== UPDATED: Unlikely Coupling: Iranian-Israeli Rita to Perform at UN (VIDEO)February 5, 2013 10:35 pm on Algemeiner.com
Rita, the Israeli-Iranian singer who has been a cultural bridge between the otherwise diametrically opposed nations, will be appearing at the UN on March, 5. The show will be titled “Tunes for Peace” and seeks to “build bridges, foster inner-cultural dialogue, and connect people to people,” according to a flier for the event. The performance will take place in the General Assembly Hall. In an interview published by The Algemeiner last year Rita explained what she sees as her role in being a cultural ambassador: “I believe that it’s up to us, the simple folks, to do all we can to break through barriers. I know the people of Iran, I grew up there. They are the most human-loving people there are, so modest and family oriented. It makes me want to show the world the ‘other’ Iran – It’s there. The extreme regime is not the people at all. People kept asking what made me sing in the language of Ahmadinejad, and I answered that his role is so minimal in such an astonishing culture and rich history, he’s just passing through.” Watch a video of Rita’s “Shah Doomad” at: www.algemeiner.com/2013/02/05/unl… —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— THE ISRAELI PRESS RELEASE OF TODAY – Friday, FEBRUARY 22, 2013 reads: Invitation to a concert at the General Assembly hall.On March 5, 2013 the Permanent Mission of Israel to the UN will host a special event in the UN General Assembly hall – a concert by the Israeli-Iranian singer Rita. Among the attendees will be Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, General Assembly President Vuk Jeremic, ambassadors, celebrities, and Jewish and Iranian community leaders. Rita will sing some of her greatest hits in Persian, Hebrew and English, and songs from her childhood in Tehran. Her Persian album, My Joys, was an international smash hit, and created a large fan base for Rita in her native Iran. Please find attached a press release: THE ISRAELI MISSION MAKES HISTORY AT THE UN WITH A CONCERT BY ISRAELI POP ICON RITA, SINGING IN BOTH PERSIAN AND HEBREW FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER IN THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY HALL
Rita, Cultural Ambassador, and Ron Prosor, Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Partner for “Tunes for Peace” Concert. The Israeli Mission to the UN announces a first-of-its-kind event to be held in the UN General Assembly Hall: a concert by world-renowned Israeli musical artist Rita. The performance, titled “Tunes for Peace,” will take place on March 5, 2013 at 7:00 PM. Among the attendees will be UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, President of the UN General Assembly Vuk Jeremic, ambassadors, diplomats, and leaders of the Jewish and Iranian communities. Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor: “In the General Assembly, the voices that we hear are usually those of condemnation and criticism towards Israel. Rita’s concert will allow the world to hear different voices – those of peace, hope, and multiculturalism. These are the true voices of Israel. Rita’s beautiful melodies will echo from the chambers of the UN General Assembly to the hearts and minds of Iranians and Israelis, fostering better understanding between our two peoples.” Rita and her nine-piece band will perform her popular hits in both Hebrew and English, as well as songs in Persian from Rita’s latest album, My Joys. The album, which has received widespread international acclaim, interweaves the Iranian melodies of Rita’s childhood with the rich tapestry of contemporary Israeli music. My Joys achieved gold status within a month of its release and created a new legion of Rita fans in her native Iran. Rita’s UN concert, “Tunes for Peace,” seeks to build bridges, foster inter-cultural dialogue, and connect people to people – the very foundations upon which the United Nations was established. Rita: “Our country has a strained relationship with the Iranian leadership. I stress the leadership – not the people. I was amazed at how enthusiastically the new album was embraced by the people of Iran. Its success drew the attention of the media, which began referring to the album as a symbol of hope and connection”. Known to the world simply as “Rita,” Rita Yahan-Farouz, emigrated from Iran at the age of eight. Over the course of her 25-year career, Rita has sold over a million albums, and currently serves as Israel’s most prominent and prolific pop voice. She recently completed a concert tour in the United States. =============================== from: Karean Peretz, Spokesperson ————————————————— PERMANENT MISSION OF ISRAEL ?????? ?????? THE ISRAELI MISSION MAKES HISTORY AT THE UN WITH A CONCERT BY ISRAELI POP ICON RITA, SINGING IN BOTH PERSIAN AND HEBREW New York, NY: The Israeli Mission to the UN announces a first-of-its-kind event to be held in the UN General Assembly Hall: a concert by world-renowned Israeli musical artist Rita. The performance, titled “Tunes for Peace,” will take place on March 5, 2013 at 7:00 PM. Among the attendees will be UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, President of the UN General Assembly Vuk Jeremic, ambassadors, diplomats, and leaders of the Jewish and Iranian communities. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 20th, 2013 Now at At TRIBECA Performing Arts Center 199 Chambers Street, New York New York’s Longest Running Jazz Concert Series
Thursday, February 14th, 2013 – 8pm Highlights In Jazz 40th Anniversary Gala Barbara Carroll with Jay Leonhart Bria Skonberg, Ken Peplowski Harlem Blues and Jazz Band Joey Morant, Fred Staton, Art Baron, Zeke Mullins, Jackie Williams, Bill Wurtzel, and Michael Max Fleming
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 20th, 2013 Though in favor of the Sunday Washington rally and demonstration to show support for a Presidential Clean Energy policy, it is a letter from Dr. James E. Hansen that helps us formulate what we instinctively found structurally wrong in the way the issue was presented at the rally. It seemed to us that the rally – booked as a CLIMATE PRESIDENTIAL event – was effectively just an anti Keystone Pipeline and anti Fracking event – thus putting in front, in the eyes of many in the crowd, the main issues of the day. But the deep issues are CLIMATE CHANGE, AIR POLLUTION, WATER POLLUTION, LAND DEGRADATION, and the hold the fossil fuels industries have on our government. What should have been stressed was rather those issues, and the need of the Administration to address those issues, and saying that the two operative technologies that the business as usual crowd want to use, and that we abhor, are like going the wrong way at a moment that we have reached A FORK IN THE ROAD - the image used by Jim Hansen (Dr. James E. Hansen. ( www.columbia.edu/~jeh1 ) The speeches at the Rally should have thus started by stressing that FORK IN THE ROAD – The one that has positives for the economy, and that we want the President to take, and the other that continues us on the road to doomsday. We do not want those two technologies mentioned above because they take us down the wrong path, but we want the President to lead the country out of the economy debacle by using the right way out of the fork in the road – and he has our backing if he leads in the right way. The truth is that the main media – the TV channels – did not cover the event because it presented mainly the negatives – the “anti” action, and it did not show the positives – the suggested technologies AND TAXES TO HELP – that could put us on the right path from this moment’s FORK IN THE ROAD. We continue here by posting excerpts from the content of Dr. Hansen’s e-mail – in a reorganized way to help us make above point. And please – let us remember – we are the FOSSIL FUEL FOOLS – if we do not advocate the carbon tax to help us get out from the fake illusion that extending the carbon-age with new carbon technologies does anything but accelerate our voyage to a doomsday destiny. (by the way – that is why I wore that yellow fools’ nose at the Washington rally as mentioned in our reporting.)
The economics is crystal clear. We are all better off if fossil fuels are made to pay their honest costs to society. We must collect a gradually rising fee from fossil fuel companies at the source, the domestic mine or port of entry, distributing the funds to the public on a per capita basis. This approach will provide the business community and entrepreneurs the incentives to develop clean energy and energy-efficient products, and the public will have the resources to make changes. This approach is transparent, built on conservative principles. Not one dime to the government.
We stand at a fork in the road. Conventional oil and gas supplies are limited. We can move down the path of dirtier more carbon-intensive unconventional fossil-fuels, digging up the dirtiest tar sands and tar shales, hydrofracking for gas, continued mountain-top removal and mechanized destructive long-wall coal mining. Or we can choose the alternative path of clean energies and energy efficiency. Transition to a post-fossil fuel world of clean energies will not occur as long as fossil fuels are the cheapest energy. Fossil fuels are cheap only because they are subsidized and do not pay their costs to society. Air and water pollution from fossil fuel extraction and use have high costs in human health, food production, and natural ecosystems, with costs borne by the public. Costs of climate change and ocean acidification also are borne by the public, especially young people and future generations. Thus the essential underlying policy, albeit not sufficient, is for emissions of CO2 to come with a price that allows these costs to be internalized within the economics of energy use. Because so much energy is used through expensive capital stock, the price should rise in a predictable way to enable people and businesses to efficiently adjust lifestyles and investments to minimize costs. An economic analysis indicates that a tax beginning at $15/tCO2 and rising $10/tCO2 each year would reduce emissions in the U.S. by 30% within 10 years. Such a reduction is more than 10 times as great as the carbon content of tar sands oil carried by the proposed Keystone XL pipeline (830,000 barrels/day). Reduced oil demand would be nearly six times the pipeline capacity, thus rendering it superfluous. If a rising price is placed on carbon, the tar sands will be left in the ground where they belong. And the remarkable life and landscape of the original North American people will be preserved. The climate science is crystal clear. We cannot go down the path of the dirty fuels without guaranteeing that the climate system passes tipping points, leaving our children and grandchildren a situation out of their control, a situation of our making. Unstable ice sheets will lead to continually rising seas and devastation of coastal cities worldwide. A large fraction of Earth’s species will be driven to extinction by the combination of shifting climate zones and other stresses. Summer heat waves, scorching droughts, and intense wildfires will become more frequent and extreme. At other times and places, the warmer water bodies and increased evaporation will power stronger storms, heavier rains, greater floods. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 18th, 2013 This was the biggest climate change rally in US history. By the organizers’ count, 50,000 people gathered by the Washington Monument and then marched past the White House. Leaders of the rally said they wanted to press Obama to follow up on the strong rhetoric in his inaugural address about the need to slow climate change. The official posters at the rally borrowed Obama’s campaign slogan “forward.” Some read: “Mr. President, Forward — on Climate.” The organizers were from www.ForwardOnClimate.org a close relative of www.350.org The temperature in Washington was well below freezing – nevertheless busloads of people arrived from all over the country. There was a mix of young and old – all people with an image of a carbon poor world. I arrived from Manhattan with Bus West-Side #2 and upon arrival picked a sign that said – “CLIMATE ACTION: IT’S OUR OBLIGATION” - If you wish – it was a festival with a cause. People came because they were enchanted with President Obama having uttered in his State of the Union speech the magic words – EXECUTIVE ORDER and wanted to show him and Congress that the 99% are behind him and want to lead him in leading the Nation. THE GENERAL IDEA IS THUS ACTIONS NEEDED BECAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE and one must stop doing business as usual – inventing new ways to supply fossil carbon fuels – that is the way FOSSIL FUEL FOOLS think. The positive way is to bring in the wind and the sun and whatever means can be found to create a non-carbon society, For practical reasons, to achieve the above, it is imperative therefore to STOP TAR OIL and SHALE GAS. This because these are methods that continue business as usual and postpone the needed real change. The problem with this rally has become thus that a large part of the rally was highjacked by the groups that came to fight the Keystone “KXL Pipeline” and the Shale-Fracking activities. CLIMATE was thus forgotten in the process and looking at the written media on-line I realized that all what they saw in it was just the opposition to these two technologies and did not cover the much larger aspect of the rally. I just cannot cope with the lack of mentioning all those wind-mills that were spinning on the Mall next to the Washington Monument. All right – WE CAME OUT FOR MOTHER EARTH and were against the Mother-frackers as one home made poster declared. We were there against the 1% that makes money out of creating misery for the 100%. Posters kept saying that we were the 99% and a New York contingent of Occupy Wall Street folks called for Occupy the Pipelines. By God – they were right demanding that President Obama block the Keystone XL pipeline and move forward toward climate action! They marched behind a long banner that read, “Occupy Wall Street, Stop Keystone.” Some dressed as grim reapers, including one carrying a paper scythe with the words “tar sands. The claim that natural gas is helping to cut back on US greenhouse gas emissions is questioned by some environmentalists. Greenpeace says no proper analysis has been done on gas leakage from fracking sites. In particular, there is a fear that methane – which is a far more dangerous greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide – may be escaping from wells and adding to the warming of the atmosphere. Campaigners claim that there have been more than 1,000 cases of groundwater contamination in the US because of fracking and have urged a moratorium on underground drilling. Signs were telling Governor Cuomo that it will be remembered at re-election time in 2015 if he allows fracking in new York State. It was a great idea to have the rally on a day that Washington was closed because of the Presidential Weekend and the President himself, and his family, enjoying good weather in Florida. After all – it was better to avoid any unneeded confrontation that some hot-head could have provoked. The rally at the Washington Monument and the walk in front of the White House were only for the media and future pressure on Congress thanks to this show of numbers. Was it a success in these terms? I do not know – the TV channels did not show the activity and the on-line media focused only on the pipeline and the fracking topics. So far I did not see the Climate Change issue, the Security issue, or the clear call for Cutting Carbon Emissions in these media avenues. —————— Forward on Climate, February 17, 2013 And here is a link to an album of pictures Owen Crowley, bus captain of New York WS#2 took today. (for disclosure – I am one of the fools with a yellow nose in those pictures.)
There were many high points: Van Jones declaring that Keystone is the only presidential decision anyone will care about in 20 years; billionaire investment fund manager in California Tom Steyer, a major fundraiser for Obama, laying out why it’s a bad investment; Chief Jackie Thomas explaining the toll that the tar sands are taking on her neighbors, and promising that they would never allow a tar sands pipeline west to the Pacific. Speakers against the Keystone pipeline included further Bill McKibben, a Middlebury College professor who has led the fight to stop the pipeline; two leaders of First Nation tribes in Canada. “If this pipeline goes through, your government will help in the raping and pillaging of the land of my ancestors,” said Chrystal Lameman, a member of the Beaver Lake Cree Nation in Canada. “Then [the companies] promise to give back what was never theirs in the first place.” “Mr. President, we have heard what you’ve said on climate; we have loved a lot of what you’ve said on climate,” said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club. “Our question is: What will you do?” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) told members of the crowd that they could help encourage Obama. “We are going to have the president’s back and he is going to have our back,” Whitehouse said, adding that “We are going to look at our grandchildren and say ‘Yes, we did.’ ” The Washington Post reported: The group rallied on a slice of the Mall just north of the Washington Monument before heading down Constitution Avenue, up 17th Street and past the White House chanting slogans such as “We are unstoppable, another world is possible” and “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Keystone pipeline’s got to go.” Said Steyer: “I get the argument for the Keystone. The argument is that it is business as usual because we use fossil fuels. But the time for business as usual has passed.” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse said that “if the president and Secretary Kerry choose to approve the pipeline and proceed, there will be a massive credibility gap between that and what he said in the inauguration, especially if this is the first deed out of the box. That will be a problem for him.” The president wasn’t home, however. He was in Florida playing golf with Tiger Woods and Jim Crane, a Houston businessman who owns the Houston Astros as well as the residential compound where Obama is spending the holiday weekend. But the demonstrators tried to send him a message nonetheless, carrying signs opposing not only the proposed pipeline from Canada to Texas, but also opposing hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, and coal plants. “Windmills, not oil spills,” one placard said. Another said, “Fossil fuels? Fossil fools.” And another: “Read my lips: no new carbons.” ———————————————————————————- People were distributing leaflets. The Sierra Club for instance wants to prepare a letter to President Obama as per www.sierraclub,org/climatelegacy PRESIDENT OBAMA’s CLIMATE AND CLEAN ENERGY LEGACY. President Obama, now is your time to lead in the fight agaubst climate disruption. The science is real, the damage to our planet and our economy is real, and – particularly after a year of extreme weather including droughts, wildfires and Hurricane sAndy – the effects on American families and their pocketbooks are very, very real. WE can turn the corner on climatedisruption, but only if America acts now. We call on you to use the Office of the Presodent to: – Make climate disruption a key pillar of your second Administration, take bold action and stand up for climate science. – Connect the dots so Americans understand how carbon emissions have led to a climate on steroids, which can trigger more climate related disasters. disruption. – Speak often about the issue to the American people and the world and encourage all lawmakers – from Heads of State, to Congress, to local cities and towns – to support meaningful administrative action on climate disruption. ———————————- Another leaflet looks at the Trans-Pacific Partnership TPP and sees in it Polluters’ Powergrab – because under free trade agreements you can not pursue polluters from outside the country under the country law. The Pollution creator will be able to sue non compliance and loss of business if certain imports are forbidden. That clearly reminded us of our experience with a US company acting out of Canada ibn an effort to force the US to pay compensation for laws that demanded un-leaded gasoline. ——————————— Another, from an alumnus of MIT, talks about the Gandean example of suffering, jail, and non-violent resistance for a cause – and expected effects from Climate Change can be such a cause. ——————————- Another passed around the link to www.FrackingExposed,com ———————————
### |






















ope Francis on Maundy Thursday declined to address enormous crowds. Instead he went to a prison to emulate Jesus’s act of humility before his crucifixion in washing the feet of his 12 disciples. The pope washed and kissed the feet of 12 inmates, two of them women and two of them Muslim (one of the women was Muslim). It is reported that some of the prisoners broke down in tears.


























