|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 4th, 2008 From: socci at ametsoc.org American Meteorological Society’s Environmental Science Public Attitudes, Perceptions, and Concern about Global Warming: Friday, July 11 NEW TIME 10:30am - 12:30pm Russell Senate Office Building, Room 253 Public Invited According to a February, 18, 2007, press release describing a survey on public perceptions of global warming, a majority of Americans agreed with most scientists that the Earth is getting warmer, but were divided over the seriousness of the problem, predicated on a belief that scientists themselves disagreed about global warming. What, if any, was the role of the news media in fueling that perception? Is that perception still prevalent? And where does the public stand today regarding amelioration strategies? Do people support the policy solutions that are most favored by the Presidential candidates? Is there a relation between what people know about global warming and how concerned they are about it? Is there a divide between Republicans and Democrats on these matters? If so, how might one explain these differences in perceptions about global warming? Moderator: Dr. Anthony Socci, Senior Science Fellow, American Meteorological Society Speaker: Dr. Jon A. Krosnick, Frederic O. Glover Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences and Professor of Communication, Political Science, and Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Program Summary With both major Presidential candidates endorsing cap and trade programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and Congress increasingly devoting effort to climate change legislation, the American public’s views of these matters will become more important in the coming months. Yet survey evidence suggests that cap-and-trade is one of the public’s least favorite ways to reduce emissions. Our speaker today, Professor Jon Krosnick, has conducted a new national survey to explore the reasons for this reluctance. Different respondents were randomly assigned to receive different descriptions of cap-and-trade, to see whether some framings increased the policy’s appeal. The results identify communication strategies that were and were not successful and thereby point to reasons for the public’s reluctance. The survey also experimentally tested the hypothesis that “balanced” news media coverage of climate change has caused the majority of Americans to believe that there is no consensus among scientific experts about the existence of climate change. The survey’s evidence highlights unintended consequences of “optimal” journalism and the power of the press. Biography For 25 years, Dr. Jon A. Krosnick has conducted research exploring how the American public’s political attitudes are formed, change, and shape thinking and action. He is co-principal investigator of the American National Election Study, the nation’s preeminent academic project exploring voter decision-making and political campaign effects. A world-renowned expert on questionnaire design and survey research methodology, he has conducted survey studies of Americans’ attitudes on environmental issues in collaboration with ABC News, the Washington Post, Time magazine, and New Scientist magazine. Dr. Krosnick has authored six books and more than 120 peer-reviewed scientific articles. His books include the Handbook of Questionnaire Design (forthcoming), Attitude Strength, Thinking about Politics, and Introduction to Survey Research, Polling, and Data Analysis. Dr. Krosnick teaches courses on survey methodology around the world at universities, for corporations, and for government agencies, testifies regularly as an expert witness in courts in the U.S. and abroad, and has served as an on-air election-night television commentator and exit poll data analyst. Dr. Krosnick earned an A.B. degree in Psychology (Magna Cum Laude) from Harvard University in 1980; an M.A. degree in Social Psychology (with Honors) from the University of Michigan in 1983, and a Ph.D. in Social Psychology from University of Michigan in 1986. Please provide us with a business card if you would like to be on our mailing list. This seminar series is open to the public and does not require a reservation. To bypass the registration table on the day of the seminar, please use this NEW online form. This ensures you will receive future email notifications for our seminars. This seminar series is open to the public and does not require a reservation. The Next Seminar is tentatively scheduled for Mid-Late September, 2008 . Please see our web site for seminar summaries, presentations and future events: http://www.ametsoc.org/seminar For more information please contact: Anthony D. Socci, Ph.D. Tel. (202) 737-9006, ext. 412 Or Jan Wilkerson Tel. (202) 737-9006, ext. 436 ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 4th, 2008 Cleantech Forums® are the world’s premier cleantech investment platforms, providing unparalleled definition, analysis, networking, deal flow and thought-leadership for the rapidly emerging cleantech industry. Cleantech’s commitment is to ensure that these forums remain the industry standard for all pursuing activities related to clean technology ventures. It is this commitment that makes Cleantech Forums® a “must attend” event for most active investors in the clean technology venture space. With each consecutive Forum we build on the success of the prior event and consistently command the largest gathering of investors interested in clean technology investment opportunities. We hope to see those interested in this compelling new category at one of our upcoming events. Cleantech Forum® XVIII Cleantech Forum® XIX Cleantech Forum® XX Cleantech Forum® XXI ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 3rd, 2008 From: jeh1 at columbia.edu makes some very interesting points about relative parts of coal, oil, and gas in 2007 emissions and their historic part in the present composition of the air, and the various sources of these emissions. He makes suggestions and asks for Fukuda’s leadership. Please open the above link in order to read Jim Hansen’s intervention to the G8. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 3rd, 2008 ALDE Conference “Religiosity and Secularism vis-à-vis fundamentalist violence” 27/08/2008, 15:30 - 18:30, 28/08/2008, 9:00 - 18:30, 29/08/2008, To register please contact marco.pannella at europarl.europa.eu and visit our ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 2nd, 2008 If Africa Will Agree To Stop Shooting at Itself, and if the Donor Countries Can Agree To Do Something Positive in the Follo-up To A World-Agreement on a new Climate Change agreement, Africa Should be Indeed a Major Part of a Carbon Trading Mechanism. In Anticipation of the Above, Some Tough Minded People Want To Try To Have Propsals On The Table For Real Plans Of Action. We Wish Them, And Ourselves - the Best of Luck. Subject: Solicitation of African Carbon Offset Projects & Travel Sponsorship Opportunity July 2, 2008 At COP‐13 in Bali, the UNFCCC Secretariat announced its intent to convene the first Africa Carbon Forum, in partnership with the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) and the multilateral agencies supporting the Nairobi Framework, including UNEP, UNDP, UNIDO, UNECA, and the World Bank. The Nairobi Framework aims to assist developing countries, especially those in sub‐Saharan Africa, to enhance their participation in the CDM. This groundbreaking high‐profile event will combine a carbon investment trade fair, a policy forum for African DNAs and climate change officials, as well as targeted capacity building for the CDM. The Forum will take place from 3 ‐ 5 September 2008 at Le Meridien Hotel, Pointe Des Almadies, in Dakar, Senegal. Further details and a draft agenda can be downloaded from the IETA website: http://www.ieta.org/ieta/www/pages/index… The organizers therefore invite all interested parties to attend and to submit their carbon offset project concepts for consideration. As co‐organizers of the Forum, UNEP and UNDP have pledged to provide travel sponsorships for CDM project champions from across the African continent to attend the event, based on a competitive selection. See attached document for additional details on the sponsorship procedures and requirements. http://www.ieta.org/ieta/www/pages/index… ————- BACKGROUND At COP13 in Bali, the UNFCCC Secretariat announced its intent to convene the 1st Africa Carbon Forum, in collaboration with the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) and the partner agencies of the Nairobi Framework, including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), The World Bank and the African Development Bank. The Nairobi Framework was initiated with the specific target of helping developing countries, especially those in sub-Saharan Africa, to improve their level of participation in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). OBJECTIVE This event will bring together representatives from designated national authorities (DNA), national focal points (NFP), representatives from several UN agencies, governments and the private sector. The Africa Carbon Forum is a platform that will strengthen links between CDM project developers and the region’s investment community, provide opportunities for DNA representatives to exchange views and share their experiences relating to the CDM, while facilitating knowledge sharing and transactions between project sponsors and global carbon offset credit buyers. The Forum will take place from 3-5 September 2008 in Dakar, Senegal, at Le Méridien Hotel, located in the Pointe Des Almadies area. The complete schedule of this three-day event will be available shortly. The Africa Carbon Forum provides a platform for companies to Present, Showcase, Meet and Interact. The exhibitor section will be open to the following types of entities: ——————- Also from Denmark: Based on the unequal geographical distribution of CDM activities where the Least Developed Countries (LDC) are largely under represented and the increasing microfinance activities in these countries, the Executive Board to the CDM launched the idea to explore the possibilities for combining CDM development with microfinance mechanisms. The COP endorsed the concept and the Government of Denmark decided to finance the project. The purpose of the project is to identify possible synergies between the CDM, especially CDM Programme of Activities (PoA), and microfinance mechanisms. The objective is to enhance CDM activities in LDCs, in particularly sub-Saharan Africa, by exploring ways to improve the financial feasibility of mitigation projects that are pertinent to LDCs. DANIDA has appointed the Danish consulting engineering company NIRAS A/S to execute the study for which we have engaged the services of the internationally recognised experts Ms. Christiana Figueres and Mr. Hans Jürgen Stehr to enhance our in house capacity. We would like to report to the EB on the advance of PoAs worldwide. Thus, if you are developing a PoA we would like to know the country(ies), the sector, and the foreseeable CPAs. We are particularly interested in PoAs in LDCs and Africa, but would be happy to receive information on PoAs in other regions. We will collate the information received and make it available to users of Climate L, as well as include it in the report to the EB. We recognise the sensitivity of particular information during the project development process due to competition issues and will thus make sure that no confidential information is distributed and that the information will be collected without attribution to who is developing the PoA if requested. Ms. Hanne Holm-Jørgensen NIRAS email: hhj at niras.dk ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 2nd, 2008 From: “Brazilian-American Chamber of Commerce, Inc.” <conference@brazilcham.com> Subject: 2008 Brazil Economic Conference in Washington DC, October 13, 2008
www.brazilcham.com
“…Brazil, the B in the BRIC economies – Brazil, Russia, India and China – today’s version of economic tigers… is projecting a period of sustained growth, with the gross domestic product increasing 5 percent a year, from now to 2010, and about 3 to 4 percent annually for the decade after.” (The New York Times, July 2, 2008) October 13, 2008 The Mayflower Hotel, Washington, D.C. Please click here to download the registration form or click here to register online. For sponsorship information, please contact the Chamber Executive Director, Sueli Bonaparte, at (212) 751-4691 or e-mail: Sueli at brazilcham.com Brazilian-American Chamber of Commerce, Inc. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 1st, 2008 G8 climate change failure could hurt U.N.-led talks. G8 leaders have a 50-50 chance of agreeing next week on a global goal of halving greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century, a Japanese foreign ministry official said, adding that failure could hurt U.N.-led climate talks. Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda hopes to build momentum for talks on a framework for after the Kyoto Protocol’s first phase ends in 2012 when the leaders meet for the July 7-9 Group of Eight summit in Hokkaido, northern Japan. G8 leaders agreed last year in Heiligendamm, Germany to seriously consider a global goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by 2050. Climate campaigners say this year’s summit should go further by endorsing that goal and linking it to bold shorter-term targets for developed countries. But divisions among the United States, Europe and Japan have raised doubts about how much the leaders can achieve next week. “You need the leaders to exert a robust political message to the world which will be driving progress in the U.N. negotiations,” Koji Tsuruoka, director general for global issues at Japan’s foreign ministry, told Reuters in an interview. Tsuruoka said a G8 failure to act would unintentionally send a negative message to the U.N. negotiations. “The stakes are very high,” he said, adding that the chances of agreement were 50-50. “Of course, the G8 will act responsibly by trying to move beyond the G8 understanding at Heiligendamm,” he said. “Whether that’s achievable or not depends on how the leaders will conduct discussions in Hokkaido.” Europe wants the G8 to commit to a long-term goal of cutting the emissions that cause global warming by 50 percent from 1990 levels by mid-century. Japan is urging that the leaders agree to a common vision of halving emissions by mid-century, without specifying a base year, Tsuruoka said. But the United States says it will only commit to targets if emerging economies such as China and India are on board. “The U.S. position is very firm. A global issue requires a global response,” Tsuruoka said. “Its a very simple, clear position, and it is very difficult to disagree with that.” But he added that he had not given up hope of a positive outcome. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on July 1st, 2008 Fukuda’s heart for G8 leadership. By KEVIN RAFFERTY That’s the immediate daily toll. Above and beyond are serious short- and medium-term threats, including Islamic terrorism that seeks mass murder and economic mayhem in the name of a supposedly merciful God, and a global economic structure that lets a billion people go to bed hungry every night. Now, conveniently on the eve of the annual global summit of world leaders, comes fresh proof of the threat to mankind’s very existence with evidence that the world is suffocating itself to death by dependence on fossil fuels. The Group of Eight leaders will meet in the cool of Hokkaido with Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda in the chair, offering Japan the opportunity to show leadership for which the world now and in generations to come would be truly thankful. U.S. data in mid-June warned that the Arctic summer ice cap is melting far more rapidly than imagined, and could be gone as soon as 2013. Previously, it had been assumed that the summer ice would hold fast until 2080. James Hansen, a leading scientist at NASA, warned the U.S. Congress in June, “We’re toast if we don’t get on a different path.” If something is not done to reduce carbon dioxide levels to 1988 levels by urgent drastic action, he forecast, expect dramatic rises in sea levels, ecosystem collapse and mass extinction. The response of world leaders has been pathetic. A hastily called summit in Saudi Arabia saw leaders of the industrialized world pleading with the oil kingdom to increase production. The Saudis did so, but only by 200,000 barrels, which was not enough to push prices down. Oil jumped above $140 a barrel amid growing talk of $200 oil, or $250, due to China and India’s thirst for it. Earlier in Osaka, G8 finance ministers promised priority on fighting inflation and pleaded for higher oil production, while U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson mouthed platitudes about commitment to a “strong dollar.” The only firm agreement was to ask the International Monetary Fund to study what part of the increase in oil prices is caused by speculation and how much is due to real increases in demand. The G8 thus underlined its uselessness by showing that it doesn’t know what is going on and they have no plan.
When Fukuda was asked about bringing new members into the G8, he said he preferred to keep the group small to preserve the intimacy of its discussions. Who is he kidding? He knows full well that every word, every comma, every jot and tittle that will appear in the G8 communique has been haggled over for months by the “footsoldiers and backcarriers.” Hardly a comma will finally appear that has not been agreed long before the presidents and prime ministers board their aircraft on their home soil. The G8 is really the G-9, with the ninth seat for the European Union. How can anyone justify giving the EU president his own place, as well as chairs for France, Germany, Italy and the Britain, while excluding China and India.
If Fukuda is a leader, he should propose the immediate admission of China and India to the G8. Give the Europeans the choice of letting the EU represent them, or living with a G8 consisting of the eight biggest global economies — in which case the EU president should be sent packing along with Canada, probably Italy and possibly even Russia.
Then, with China’s Hu Jintao and India’s Manmohan Singh at the top table, he should unveil plan B, with a proposed outline and specific targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1988 levels by 2025. He should promise that Japan will abide by his proposals and challenge the U.S. to stop playing the children’s game of refusing to join in until China and India do. Next, let Fukuda call back the press and hangers-on for a real press conference, with tough questions and honest answers — not the travesty allowed by Finance Minister Fukushiro Nukaga at Osaka where 15 minutes of the allotted 30 was wasted reading in Japanese the already published communique (the other 15 was spent evading questions). Fukuda should contemplate the empty glory of a useless summit before he becomes toast as yet another unlamented former prime minister. The G8 is toast and soon we will all be toast. Is that Fukuda’s preferred legacy? ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on June 30th, 2008 The Economist Covers China:
Earthquakes, Demonstrations and the Beijing Olympic Games Wednesday July 9, 2008 at 6:30 PM A conversation between James Miles Co-Sponsored by The Economist and the Center on US-China Relations, Asia Society
Asia Society 725 Park Avenue at 70th Street, NY, NY 10021 | 212-288-6400 |






















Printer Friendly

