|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 7th, 2010
E i n l a d u n g EARTHDAY 2010 am Samstag, 20. März
Die Idee, einen Tag der Erde zu feiern, hat in vielen Teilen der Welt in den siebziger Jahren die Umweltbewegungen zusammengeführt. Ursprünglich sollte aber mit dem „Tag der Erde“ – der nun schon 15 mal bei den Vereinten Nationen in Wien begangen wird – noch viel mehr erreicht werden. Der Gründer des Earth Days, JohnMcConnell, hat diesen Tag vor 41 Jahren auch als interkulturellen Feiertag der “Bürger der Erde” verstanden, der den Anspruch jedes einzelnen Menschen auf Mitgestaltung und Teilhabe in Frieden und Gewaltfreiheit ausdrückt. Der verstorbene Auslandsösterreicher Hans Janitschek hat sich erfolgreich dafür eingesetzt dass diese Tradition, von Generalsekretär U Thant in New York begonnen, auch in Wien beachtet wird, wie klein auch immer. Anmeldung ist wegen des Eincheckens in den Sicherheitsbereich bis 16. März erforderlich: phaider@chello.at Mit herzlichen Grüßen Mag. Franz Nahrada, UN Liaison – Earth Society Foundation in Vienna Peter Haider, UN Liaison – Universal Peace Federation A ground pass is required to enter Vienna International Centre (VIC). If you do not have a permanent pass, please mail your name to phaider@chello.at not later than March 16th. A list of participants will then be at the main gate of the VIC and upon showing a personal document you will be issued a ground pass. Recipients of this invitation who would like to attend the meeting are requested to present this invitation and their identity document at Gate 1 of the VIC. The VIC, 1220 Wien, Wagramerstrasse 5, is best reached by U 1 (Kaisermühlen) ### | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 5th, 2010 Thursday, 04 March 2010
IPI to Hold 60th Anniversary World Congress in Vienna and BratislavaThinking the Unthinkable: Are We Losing the News?The International Press Institute (IPI) will hold its annual World Congress in Vienna, Austria, and Bratislava, Slovakia, from 11-14 September 2010, the organisation today officially announced. The 2010 World Congress will mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of IPI, and the organisation will celebrate 60 years of defending press freedom in a series of events, culminating in the World Congress in the “twin cities” of Vienna and Bratislava. Under the overall theme, “Thinking the Unthinkable: Are We Losing the News? (Media Freedom in the New Media Landscape),” the three-day conference will focus attention on the state of the news media itself, providing new business models and solutions for the media, and the unique opportunity to meet and interact with major players from both traditional and new media outlets. The Congress will also look at the new ways of delivering information and how new technologies are proving to be a powerful ally of freedom of opinion and expression. “The new information platforms are having an enormous impact not only on mainstream journalism, but also on press freedom in countries where authoritarian regimes seek to curtail freedom of opinion and expression,” said IPI Director David Dadge. At a special Gala Dinner and Ceremony, to be held at Vienna City Hall, IPI will honour “60 World Press Freedom Heroes” to commemorate the 60 years of its existence. IPI’s Press Freedom Heroes are individuals who have made a significant contribution to the defence and promotion of press freedom, especially – but not only – if this involved acts of resistance or bravery under hardship conditions. “We will pay tribute to these brave men and women, who displayed the utmost courage in defending press freedom in their country or region,” said Dadge. “Many of them paid the ultimate price, murdered for what they wrote or said.” IPI intends to invite all surviving Heroes to the ceremony in Vienna. For the first time, IPI will also hold – parallel to the Congress – a “New Media & High-Tech Innovations Exhibition”, showcasing the latest in new media technologies and information platforms. The Congress programme features a roster of world-class speakers, including Alex Jones, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and director of the Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government; Jeff Howe, contributing editor at Wired Magazine and author of the best-selling book, “Crowdsourcing”; Jim VandeHei, co-founder and executive editor of the influential Politico website; Martin Figueiredo, publisher and editor-in-chief of i Daily in Portugal; Guy Black, executive director of the Telegraph Media Group in the United Kingdom; Alexandra Föderl-Schmid, editor-in-chief of Der Standard in Austria; Sarah Montague, presenter, BBC, London, and many more. The event is expected to draw over 400 participants and their guests from around the world. Confirmed partners for the Congress are: Google; OMV; Samsung; Telekom Austria Group; City of Vienna; Twin City Liner; and Austrian Airlines, as official carrier. IPI’s media partners for the Congress are: ORF; Der Standard & APA. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 7th, 2010 January 14, 2010 we got an e-mail from the Office of Science and Technology of the Embassy of Austria to the United States, informing us that a documentary “In Search of Memory” will be shown to the public from January 8 t0 January 14, 2010 at the Movie House of IFC on Sixth Avenue in Manhattan. In effect the showings were extended by two additional weeks subsequently, and covered the time period of this year’s Holocaust Remembrance week. Further, the e-mail said – The documentary had its first US screening tour a year earlier in 2009, and was shown in DC, NY, MA, CA as can be found on http://www.ostina.org/content/view/15/30… This is a biographical documentary on the life and work of Austrian neuroscientist and Nobel Prize winner Eric Kandel it said. Also it said: Please find details on today’s premiere featuring a Q&A session with Dr. Kandel, show times, media comments, and details on the movie at – http:// www.ostina.org and at http://icarusfilms.com/new2009/mem.html We could not go that opening day but made it up later as this is indeed an exceptional documentary with many good reasons for people to go to see it if the chance is offered again. Dr. Kandel, then a youngster, arrived with his brother Ludwig, alone, to Hoboken New Jersey in April 1939. They escaped Nazi Vienna as their grandparents did earlier. Their parents sent them to the grandparents and luckily managed to join in a short while also. Please see - http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Eric_Ka… Eric Richard Kandel (born November 7, 1929) is a psychiatrist, a neuroscientist and professor of biochemistry and biophysics at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. He was a recipient of the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on the physiological basis of memory storage in neurons. He shared the prize with fellow recipients Arvid Carlsson and Paul Greengard. His other honors include the National Medal of Science, the Wolf Prize – which is the Israeli Nobel, the Gairdner International Award, the Charles A. Dana Award and the Lasker Award. Kandel has been at Columbia University since 1974, and lives in New York City. Kandel has recently authored “In Search of Memory: The Emergence of a New Science of Mind” (WW Norton), which chronicles his life and research. The book was awarded the 2006 Los Angeles Times Book Award for Science and Technology. Eric Kandel was born in 1929 in Vienna, Austria, in a middle-class Jewish family. His mother had come from Kolomyya in Eastern Poland (Eastern Galizia that was under Austrian rule until WWI – he used to joke “as with all bright people, my roots are in Poland”) and his father from Olesko in Western Ukraine. His parents met in Vienna and married in 1923, shortly after Hermann Kandel, Eric’s father, had established a toy store. They were a thoroughly assimilated and accultured family, which had to leave Austria after the country had been invaded/annexed by Germany in March 1938, Aryanization (Arisierung) started and attacks on Jews and Jewish property escalated. Eventually Eric and his brother Ludwig, and later their parents, succeeded in moving to the US. Eric Kandel’s initial intellectual interests lay in the area of history, and that was his undergraduate major at Harvard University. He wrote an honors dissertation on “The Attitude Toward National Socialism of Three German Writers: Carl Zuckmayer, Hans Carossa, and Ernst Jünger.” “While at Harvard, a place dominated by the work of B. F. Skinner, Kandel became interested in learning and memory. (It should be noted, however, that while Skinner championed a strict separation of psychology, as its own level of discourse, from biological considerations such as neurology, Kandel’s work is essentially centered on an explication of the relationships between psychology and neurology.)” “The world of neuroscience was first opened up to Kandel through his interactions with a college girlfriend, Anna Kris, whose parents were Freudian psychoanalysts. Freud, a pioneer in revealing the importance of unconscious neural processes, was at the root of Kandel’s interest in the biology of motivation and unconscious and conscious memory.” I will stop here and refer the reader to the above mentioned link. My reason for going up to this point was to show the thorough Viennese cultural home environment of this refugee family that had to escape for their life to the new world of freedom they found in the US, and how at first, at Harvard, Eric Kandel was still trying to understand what happened to his parents first adopted homeland – Austria. It was this search for understanding that turned perhaps to his scientific search to understand the process of memory – so now this explains the trip back to Vienna, after years of having had no direct relationship to that part of his roots, he eventually goes there and the whole event turns into an exercise in practical memory. On the other hand, interesting is also the way how the New Austria looks at Dr. Kandel, and many of the other refugee families that managed to escape the Nazi planned extermination of the Jews – really without even a consideration of who among those Jews still had any relationship to his/her Jewish origin. Yes, after he got the Nobel Prize, Austria claimed him back and restored his Austrian citizenship – now it is claimed that he is an Austrian scientist – something that from his personal make-up he might well be, but then – who deserves what kudos for his success story? Austria? Harvard? Columbia? Plain humanity? Dr. Kandel is an amazing fellow – great are also all the members of his family that went with him on that trip back to Vienna, and also back to France where Dr. Kandel’s wife was saved by good Samaritans in a Cahors monastery. Amazing how they were able to show no single sign of bitterness about those past events, and how they were able to make new connections with friendly young Austrians, including the people that live in his parents old apartment, that swooned about them and relished in Dr. Kandel’s success in making for himself a successful life in spite of everything. I would like also to suggest to the good people of the UN outreach program, that for next year’s Holocaust Remembrance week at the UN headquarters they figure a program with the Kandel family and Austria. This will be a clear chance to show that it is possible to overcome memories when one manages to bring them up from the unconscious – and have the courage to explain them scientifically as well.
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 3rd, 2010 The problem was the 51 cents/gallon of ethanol from sugar-cane tariff, the US imposes against imports from international producers of bioethanol – so they do not compete with US agro-ethanol. We are cynics by nature and wonder if the release today has anything to do with Shell Oil Company having announced last weekend that they will invest over a billion dollars in the production of sugar-cane ethanol in Brazil. So, did we have to wait until an oil company steps heavily into this area – so we finally allow US door to be opened to a non-petroleum liquid fuel? WE ARE VERY PARTIAL TO THIS TOPIC BECAUSE BACK IN 1978 AT UNIDO IN VIENNA, AND IN 1979 IN NEW ORLEANS, I WAS PERSONALLY INVOLVED IN BRINGING THIS SUBJECT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LIQUID FUEL HUNGRY WESTERN WORLD. IN VIENNA WE SHOWED THE CUBAN EXPERIENCE AT A UN – AUSTRIA – SWEDEN EVENT. IN NEW ORLEANS THIS WAS “THE FIRST INTER-AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE SOURCES OF ENERGY” THAT I HELPED ORGANIZE. OBVIOUSLY – TO LOUISIANA WE COULD NOT BRING THE CUBANS – BUT BRAZIL, ARGENTINA AND MANY OTHERS WERE PRESENT UNDER THE FRIENDLY EYES OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF STATE. ETHANOL BECAME A RECOGNIZED FUEL, BUT US AGRICULTURE MADE SURE IT WILL BE US CORN AS FEEDSTOCK. WE COULD NOT EVEN GET PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR IMPORTS FROM FRIENDLY COUNTRIES BECAUSE OIL AND AGRICULTURE – SOME OF THE STRONGEST LOBBIES IN WASHINGTON – WOULD NOT ALLOW IT , EVEN AFTER THE INTERVENTION OF US REPUBLICAN SENATORS LIKE FRANK CHURCH, JACOB JAVITS, CHARLES PERCY – SO WHAT WILL IT BE NOW? WILL THOSE TARIFFS COME OFF? —————- Sugarcane ethanol is a renewable fuel refined from cane that grows typically in tropical climates. Compared to other types of ethanol available today, using sugarcane ethanol to power cars and trucks yields greater reductions in greenhouse gases and is usually much cheaper for drivers to purchase. Brazil has replaced more than half of its fuel needs with sugarcane ethanol – making gasoline the alternative fuel in that country and ethanol the standard. Many observers point to sugarcane ethanol as a good option for diversifying U.S. energy supplies, increasing healthy competition among biofuel manufacturers and improving America’s energy security. The RFS2 will help the United States meet energy security and greenhouse gas reduction goals sought by the Energy Security and Independence Act of 2007 (EISA). The new regulations establish minimum biofuels consumption in the U.S. of more than 12 billion gallons (45 billion liters) in 2010, rising to 36 billion gallons (136 billion liters) in 2022, of which 21 billion gallons per year would have to be one of three types of advanced biofuels: cellulosic, biomass diesel, and “other advanced,” that meet required GHG reduction thresholds as determined by the EPA. Today, EPA affirmed that sugarcane ethanol meets the “other advanced” category in the RFS2, although with a GHG reduction level that exceeds the requirement for all categories as well. Specifically, EPA’s calculations show that sugarcane ethanol from Brazil reduces GHG emissions compared to gasoline by 61%, using a 30-year payback for indirect land use change (iLUC) emissions. “We are pleased that EPA took the time to improve the regulations, particularly by more accurately quantifying the full lifecycle greenhouse emission reductions of biofuels. EPA’s reaffirmation of sugarcane ethanol’s superior GHG reduction confirms that sustainably-produced biofuels can play a important role in climate mitigation. Perhaps this recognition will sway those who have sought to raise trade barriers against clean energy here in the U.S. and around the world. Sugarcane ethanol is a first generation biofuel with third generation performance,” noted Velasco. “While we are reviewing the final rule, it is clear that EPA has incorporated many of the comments that UNICA and other stakeholders made during the public process. EPA should be congratulated for the way it upheld the Obama’s goals of transparency and scientific integrity in the environmental rulemaking. And we hope that other governments should take note of the manner that EPA has handled this process,” concluded Velasco. Brazil is a leader in the production of sugarcane ethanol, which is widely considered as the most efficient biofuel available today. In 2009, Brazil produced over 7 billion gallons of sugarcane ethanol, most of which is used in Brazil in flex fuel vehicles. As a result of Brazil’s innovative use of sugarcane ethanol in transportation and biomass for cogeneration, sugarcane is the leading source of renewable energy in the nation, representing 16% of the country’s total energy needs. In fact, gasoline has become the alternative in Brazil, reducing the country’s dependence on fossil fuels lowering emissions. A recent study in the November 2009 edition of the journal Energy Policy indicated that since 1975, over 600 million tons of CO2 emissions have been avoided thanks to the use of ethanol in Brazil. ——— —————- Brazil Hopes Shell-Cosan Can Boost Ethanol Exports Date: 04-Feb-10, Reuters from Brazil SAO PAULO – Brazil’s ethanol industry, which invested heavily to boost output of the cane-based biofuel, is counting on a tie-up between sugar and ethanol producer Cosan and Royal Dutch Shell Plc to revive its prospects after exports fell short of expectations. The $21-billion-a-year ethanol joint venture announced by the two companies on Monday will enable Cosan, Brazil’s biggest ethanol maker, to move product more efficiently thanks to Shell’s global fuel distribution and retail system. Cosan views the venture as a way to make Brazil’s ethanol a global commodity. But whether that happens will depend largely on outside factors: whether oil is costly enough to make ethanol competitive; whether Brazil’s mills can provide a steady stream of biofuel; and whether key markets such as the United States will be more open to ethanol imports. “Shell chose ethanol as the renewable fuel they want to be in and it chose Brazil. Whether this will mean more exports will depend on a series of circumstances beyond the companies’ control,” said ethanol expert Eduardo Pereira de Carvalho. Some analysts say any growth in ethanol exports will depend on oil prices more than other factor. “The deal itself does not raise or reduce the economic viability of blending anhydrous ethanol in gasoline. This will be determined by the oil market,” said sugar and ethanol analyst Julio Maria Borges, director at Job Economia. High oil prices together with environmental woes were then feeding discussions about a broader adoption of biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels. But oil prices tumbled as the global credit crisis intensified, and there was a similar decline in foreign interest for the cane-based fuel. Brazilian ethanol exports in 2009 slipped to 3.3 billion liters despite extremely low prices on the Brazilian market. If ethanol is economically viable compared to oil, however, Brazilian ethanol exports should benefit from Shell’s global infrastructure, commercial relationships and know-how. Shell, with distribution centers and 45,000 filling stations around the world, will have access to annual supplies of 2 billion liters of Cosan ethanol. But the lack of steady supplies from Brazil, which produces 26 billion liters of ethanol a year that are mostly consumed domestically, may trouble potential long-term buyers. Futures markets for ethanol have been incapable of minimizing producers’ risks. Deals are largely done on a spot basis — both in and outside Brazil. This makes it difficult for buyers and sellers to hedge against market volatility. Brazil’s government has worked on ways of softening this problem by providing financing to mills to build stocks, which also smoothes out local prices over the year. But the system remains stubbornly inefficient. “The same old problem will continue. Mills say they will expand production if there’s demand but demand will only be created if there’s the certainty of stable supplies,” said an ethanol expert based in the United States. A U.S. tariff on imports of cane-derived ethanol is another roadblock to Brazil’s expansion goals. Some in the industry have suggested Shell’s entry into ethanol production in Brazil could mean extra pressure for removal of the tariff. But it is not clear whether there could be a move in that direction. “The oil industry was always against the U.S. tariff. The news is that it is now seeing a solution in cane,” said Joel Velasco, the North American representative for Brazil’s Sugarcane Industry Association, Unica. But the announcement that the biggest-ever foray into biofuels by an oil major would happen in Brazil was a clear sign of preference for the fuel over other options. “It’s difficult to predict (when exports could rise)… but the strategic meaning of a company the size of Shell to invest here is the most important point,” Carvalho said. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 2nd, 2010 The White House has said that the US President would not be attending what used to be the regularly scheduled EU-US talks, which have been planned to take place in Madrid in May 24-25, 2010 by the Spanish Rotating EU Presidency for the First half of 2010. Honestly, why should he participate in the European Games while there are so many real problems on his plate? The EU has three Presidents – if they cannot decide who is their President in fact – do they really expect for Obama to travel trans-Atlantic, and sit at Summits chaired by all three of them – Herman Van Rampuy, The Permanent EU President, Jose Manuel Baroso, the President of the European Commission, and the Spanish Prime Minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, who is presently the Rotating President of the EU? Papers write of a “Snub.” This is ridiculous and for us who watched the Copenhagen Conference that was saved by President Obama under a G-2 arrangement with China, because he had to act fast if he wanted to save the meeting from itself, and there was no strong man or woman of the EU to stand at his side, the above “News” are old hat – and we say – we told you so! Actually, we welcome Charles Forelle writes as “World News” in the Wall Street Journal of today: “Things haven’t been good recently for Europe’s position on the world stage. Despite the new treaty ambition to make the EU a bigger player, the bloc has sometimes seen itself shut out. At climate talks in Copenhagen in December, Mr. Obama hammered out a last-minute accord with China and other emerging nations. The Europeans were left out of the picture.” This recognition of reality in a WSJ article is very unusual – but this is real life. If the EU does not get together – and still claims 7 seats at the G-20 – rather then one seat for real – they are turning themselves, by their own choice, into world political irrelevancy. The same is true at the UN where we see more and more a 2 1/2 seats situation – with France and the UK in Security Council seats but Germany on practical UN Security Commissions, and no EU representative with any powers what so ever. Obama’s decision not to go to Madrid is no snub to Mr. Zapatero or to Spain – but rather the cleareeded sign that he wants to go and meet the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED EUROPE. Had Obama decided to go to Masdrid it would have been as if someone from Europe would come to a meeting of the US Governor’s Association. Just think – Germany id California, France is New York, the UK is Texas, Spain is Florida, Poland is Illinois, Austria is Vermont … etc etc. Perhapse indeed Van Rampuy should come to the US Governor’s Association meeting in order to learn what is needed in order to create out of the EU the neededpartner for Obama in order to turn the G-2 into a G-3 and to create out of the G-20 a new meaningful global body. ———————– The best article on this we found is from The Telegtaph: By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels – from Telegraph.com The White House has said that Barack Obama will not be attending the EU-US talks planned to take place in Madrid in May. Honestly, why should he particioate in the European Games while there are so many real problems on his plate. Even the venue for the summit, Madrid or Brussels, has been “up in the air” after a tussle between Spain, which holds the EU’s rotating presidency and Herman Van Rompuy, the new created President of Europe. Under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty, Mr Van Rompuy, President of the European Council which represents EU heads of government, should host the summit in Brussels as Europe’s lead negotiator in global bilateral talks. But Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, the Spanish prime minister, insisted that he should host the summit because the EU was in “transition” after the Lisbon Treaty entered into force in December. A US official told the Wall Street Journal that President Obama had not yet received an a formal invitation to the EU-US summit, a twice yearly meeting that has taken place since 1991. “We don’t even know if they’re going to have one. We’ve told them, ‘Figure it out and let us know’,” said the official. Other American diplomats have blamed confusion over which of the three EU “presidents” is in charge of the summit – Mr Van Rompuy, Mr Zapatero or José Manuel Barroso, the European Commission president. “Who attends from the US and at what point will depend on who’s calling the meeting,” said a US state department official. Many national and EU diplomats are dismayed at the institutional infighting that has followed the entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty. “The Spanish are behaving badly. They’ve made a mess of the summit but Van Rompuy and the post-Lisbon EU institutions will carry the can in the long term. The squabbling has damaged the EU in the eyes of the most powerful nation in the world,” said a senior source. A European Commission spokesman hinted that the meeting would have to be downgraded or cancelled if Mr Obama did not show up. “Normally a summit is a summit because it is attended by heads of state and government,” said the spokesman. A Spanish foreign ministry spokesman said: “The EU-US summit is scheduled to take place in May in Madrid, as was foreseen and we are still preparing it.” US officials have indicated that Mr Obama might reschedule talks with the EU in the wings of a Nato summit in Portugal this autumn. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on February 1st, 2010
This Album memorializes the arrival of Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz in May of 1944. It is the only one of its kind, and it is solely due to this album that we have a visual history of what occurred in the Auschwitz-Birchenau death camp. The album was discovered after the war by an Auschwitz survivor, Lily Jacob, who donated it to Yad Vashem in 1980. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on January 30th, 2010 . The Best at the UN ends up reflecting also on the worst: The UN Headquarters have many people of value – of compassion and of hope for a better future – this besides of some in the bureaucracy that might be innocents with no vision, others might be plants from Member States that want no part of human rights, dignity, or even of plain truth – so be it. The good people under the leadership of Eric Falt and Kimberly Mann came up with a very interesting program that we posted earlier so people from outside the UN could know how to find their way in order to participate at these events. The list is in our following link: Later we found out that the information about these events was sent to parties outside the UN, was made available to the Press accredited to the UN, but as it turned out – from the 6 events listed by UN Outreach – only two events were printed in the Daily Journal of the UN. That journal is not made available now to NGOs – only to the diplomats – but then NGOs get their information from reading the Journal on the internet – so you can say that the UN Department of Information – the source of the Journal – even though it can contend that it made the information available to the PRESS – can in no way justify why it did not make available the information to the in-house members of the UN – except may-be say that some of those were not interested in the Holocaust as more pressing issues are at hand. But what about the educational aspects that were so important to the good people of the UN Outreach Division? The day after the main event of Wednesday, a head of an NGO Committee that is daily at the UN, asked me – how did you know about the concert? I did not see it listed anywhere. And trust me – that was neither a question of space nor of security. Then what? The UN In-House events numbered six, and participation was being granted by various sources – some of them outside the UN. Let us start with the two events that appeared continuously in the Journal announcements: These were the Wednesday January 27, 2010 event organized by the Jewish B’nai Brith International NGO in cooperation with the UN Permanent Mission of the Czech Republic. It dealt with the “Inter religious responses to the Holocaust – 65 years after liberation.” Tickets to this event were sent out by the B’nai Brith organization. There was no problem obtaining them after the appropriate phone call. The other event was on Thursday January 28, 2010 – titled “The Moroccan Jews and Their legacy of survival.” The Journal does not mention that it was organized by the Moroccan Government but directed those interested to contact the DPI/NGO section as it was booked as a regular, weekly, DPI briefing to the NGOs. When approached – the appropriate UN officials said – send us a letter on NGO letterhead. So – this event was being treated as a regular NGO event – not as the important message that the Moroccan Government intended to put forward before members of the UN, and others who actually had no knowledge that during the terrible days of the Holocaust – there was indeed one Arab King – H.M. King Muhammad V of Morocco – who told the Nazis – the Jews of Morocco are my subjects and I do not discriminate between Jews and other Moroccans. Now that was a powerful message that deserved to be heard at the UN – and if not – the organization does not deserve the funds the world sends its way. I had no doubt that I had to take a stand on this issue – and I did. ——— The other four events of the week, none of them listed in the Journal, included two quentesential exhibits organized by Non-Governmental factors outside the UN. On Monday, January 25, 2010, there was a show of hope – it was actually called “Generations: Survival and Legacy of Hope,” for which entrance was obtained from the Shoa Foundation Institute in Los Angeles. This organization, funded initially by Mr. Steven Spielberg from Schindler’s list funds, has documented on video the stories of survivors and their descendants. Two families were present at the showing of material. Despite the terrible material it is the hope that shows through in the success of having picked up their lives again – this is what gives a reason for having hope in institutions that were established under the “Never Again” logo. This event – paired up with the following day opening – together form the raison d’etre for the UN institution – but you would not know this from the way the UN kept these two events of its Journal. On Tuesday. January 26, 2010, the Exhibit – “Architecture of Murder: Auschwitz-Birkenau,” for which entrance was obtained from the Yad Vashem – Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Authority. At this event participated also the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, The Israeli Minister for Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Yuli-Yoel Edelstein, and US Ambassador Rick Barton. ——– The other two events that were not listed in the Journal are: - The main Holocaust Memorial Ceremony and Concert in the General Assembly Hall for which one needed special tickets – so it was clearly a more controlled participation, and that was the event that the lady I mentioned earlier asked me about as she would have wanted to come had she known about it. - The Thursday January 28, 2010 screening of the film “Defiance” that was co-sponsored by the Permanent Mission of the US and had present the lady that wrote the book, Nehama Tec, and her son who made the movie. The great thing about this movie is that it depicts the true story of the Bielski brothers – a story of Jewish fighters in the forests of Belarus – as the UN release says correctly – it depicts “the struggle of a group of brave Jews who fought against overwhelming odds thus providing a sharp contrast to the countless WWII movies that portray Jews just as victims.” The two Bielski Brigades – the one under one brother that fought with the Russian partisans, and the other – under another brother that guarded the Jewish families in the forest. When the two groups fought together – they turned around the Nazi effort to clear the forest. 1200 people survived thanks to the Bielskis’ leadership. Two of the three Bielskis survived and eventually owned a small trucking business in the US. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on January 30th, 2010 On November 1, 2005, SIXTY YEARS SINCE THE END OF WORLD WAR II, THE LIBERATION OF THE AUSCHWITZ EXTERMINATION CAMP BY THE SOVIET ARMY, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UN, finally, the UN that in major part came about because of the fact that the world realized that walking in the ashes caused by anti-Semitism and other isms, is not the will of the human race; the UN was created to learn from that experience – but did it? It took 60 years, the creation of the State of Israel, the travails of Zionism is Racism abomination, and one strong Ambassador of humanity to the organization – US Professor/ Senator/Ambassador Moynihan, to start to beat the anti-Semitic UN steel into compliance. ————— UN Designates International Holocaust day This is the first time ever that a resolution introduced by Israel has been adopted by the UN General Assembly. Some not inconsiderable distance has been traveled from the infamous “Zionism is Racism” resolution to this resolution. At least, the world can be united in condemning genocide, even if “Zionists” propose the initiative. The vision of Austria and Germany co-sponsoring and approving of such a resolution is certainly heartening to the surviving victims of Nazi persecution, to the Jews, gypsies and others whose families died in the Holocaust and to the state of Israel. What public activities will mark Holocaust day in Iran, where President Ahmedinejad has called for a world without Zionism and America? In Syria, a book about the Blood Libel (the accusation that Jews kill Christian children in order to use their blood for baking Matzot) was written by the former minister of Defense. Syria also made notable contributions to the history of racial persecution in its treatment of the Kurds. Will Syria mark this day in sympathy with the victims, or will they celebrate it by showing, perhaps, a screening of Lenni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will? Will this day become an occasion for so-called “anti-Zionists” to trot out Holocaust denial and accusations that Israel is committing a Holocaust against the Palestinians, or that the Zionists collaborated with the Nazis? Will the world again stand aside at the next genocide, as it did in Rwanda, and as it did for a very long time in Darfur, and as it continues to do in Tibet? In the discussion, each state was quick to accuse others of genocide, but unwilling to accept responsibility for crimes of their own states and governments. The Venezuelans spoke about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Chinese alluded to Japanese crimes. The Ukrainians alluded to Soviet crimes. The discussion would have more meaning if the Americans had spoken about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Chinese had spoken about their activities in Tibet, the Japanese had spoken the rape of Mongolia and the Turks had spoken of the Armenian genocide. The implementation of the resolution will be of more consequence than the paper or the words themselves, and the reality of the actions of states will be more important than either. The proliferation of vile Web sites and articles about the “Holocaust Myth,” claiming the Holocaust never happened and is yet another Jewish plot, points up the urgent need for this day of remembrance. Alert readers of what was said that say will note some bitter ironies in the remarks of representatives of some states, whose people and governments were active collaborators or passive accessories in the crime of the Holocaust. The date – January 27 – was picked as that was the date the Auschwitz-Birkenau extermination machine was closed by the Soviet army. http://www.zionism-israel.com/news/holocaust_day.htm The first commemoration was held at the UN in 2006 and this year we have thus the fifth such event – or actually a series of events, that traditionally start on the Saturday before the actual date with a ceremony at the Park East Synagogue located on Manhattan’s East Side – Midtown. The list of this year’s events at the UN, as provided to parties outside the UN – and published on our website is: But besides the UN itself, the fact that the UN has thrown the light upon the Holocaust atrocities, and the world’s need to remember these atrocities by having an International day of Remembrance, it is now that even in unexpected places in the civilized world, we find events being organized for the purpose of remembering and of learning from that experience. We thought thus to mention here one such event in a place we hardly expected to find it – the main Carnival city of the North-East of Brazil – Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. We will be reporting on this year’s week-long series in several postings that will involve also other related events – for now we will put up the clear Jewish angle to the comemoration – as it reflected in the Park East Sybagogue events and in the political official presentation at the UN main event of January 27, 2010 REMARKS AT PARK EAST SYNAGOGUE IN MEMORY OF THE VICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST by H.E. Srgjan Kerim President of the 62nd session of the United Nations General Assembly. Park East Synagogue Rabbi Schneier, I am very grateful to Rabbi Schneier for inviting me to the Park East I am sure that you are all very proud of Rabbi Schneier for his It was only five years ago that I had my first opportunity to attend Nowhere in the world is it possible I’ve always believed Park East Beit Knesset, I wish there would not have been such an occasion for me to address Unfortunately, we are still facing some lonely, desperate attempts to We gather here today to remember and pay homage to those who lost The liberation of the Nazi concentration camps over 60 years ago Elie Wiesel – Nobel Laureate, a Holocaust survivor and champion of “Let us remember, let us remember the heroes of Warsaw, the martyrs of We must also remember to pay tribute to those who survived and bravely I know that some of you are with us today. Not only have you survived, but you have rebuilt communities all over The recognition of this day of Holocaust remembrance by the Dear Friends, Remembering is an ethical act; it has ethical value in itself. Remembrance is also a means through which we can understand ourselves: I am reminded of my father and his family. During the Second World War At the age of twenty my father and Isac subsequently joined the Isac Sion subsequently went on to become Vice-governor of the Central My father and many others like him served the Jewish people in their “All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” When I had my first opportunity, in some small way, to redress the And, in honour of the Jewish community, my country will soon complete Looking back at the turbulent history of the Balkan region there are We must remember that every religion and culture must be tolerant of Furthermore, intolerance of other religions or cultures is often a Dear Friends and members of Park East Beit Knesset, The United Nations was founded on the ashes of the Holocaust, when the That these atrocities occurred is not necessarily the failure of the Even while we gather here, there are places – like Darfur – where For the dignity of all humanity, we must strengthen our ability – our Indeed, terrorism, violence, rape, murder, poverty and discrimination Despite the tragic failures of the international community to prevent In 2005, the General Assembly passed a resolution that included the In fact all of us here today can add our voice, with the United Rabbi Schneier offers us an example of what we can do. He has been a In 2003 we jointly organized the first ever South East European In this spirit, and as we have just celebrated the life of the great “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere….. Whatever Dear Friends, On the occasion of the International Day of Commemoration in memory of Together, it is our common challenge to eliminate all distorted We can achieve this by promoting intercultural dialogue and But we must also move from words to action, from principled intentions Members of Park East Beit Knesset, Let me wish all of you and the wider community peace, health and prosperity. Let all our thoughts honour the victims of the Holocaust, and let us In order to do so, it is not enough to reiterate solemn gestures; we Thank you. Shalom. ————– But that was the last President of the UN General Assembly to be welcome to speak before a Jewish Audience – in those 5 years. Before him were: Mr. Jan Eliasson of Sweden #60, and Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa of Bahrain #61. Now it is UNGA’s 64th session: On 10 June 2009, Ali Abdussalam Treki of Libya was elected by acclamation at a plenary meeting of the 192-member body of the United Nations General Assembly. Treki assumed office as president of the 64th session on 15 September 2009, But in 2009, The Park East Congregation had the honor to host the UN —————- Remarks at Holocaust Remembrance Day Ceremony at the Park East Synagogue: Thank you very much, Rabbi [Arthur] Schneier, for that kind introduction. I especially appreciate you for calling me a mensch. With apologies to To all, I wish you Shabat Shalom. Excellencies, distinguished Ambassadors to the United Nations, Ladies and Gentlemen, Today we mark the International Day of Commemoration honoring victims As you know, my friend, the late Tom Lantos, died shortly after last I can only imagine what he endured. Yet I, too, have witnessed man’s The UN helped South Korea to recover. Like Tom Lantos, like many of Today, the UN is on the cusp of a great transition. Never have global Yes, the UN has its imperfections. It’s not perfect. Because of this, We are here to mark the Holocaust. Like you, the United Nations is Precisely two years ago, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution With you, I stand in saying: never again. Never. When I paid tribute Memory speaks. That is why it must be preserved and passed to future Our Holocaust Outreach Program sponsors exhibits, workshops and panel When President Ahmadinejad of Iran declared that Israel should We at the United Nations stand for human rights. We stand for democracy and the rule of law. By working for economic We have a new instrument in our hands. It is called the Responsibility Yes, it is difficult in practice. But I assure you. This is a major My friends, Today is not simply a time for remembering. The Holocaust has lessons My job can sometimes be terribly painful. I see unbelievable hardship, I am just back from the region. I went to push for a cease-fire. More, The recurring violence between Palestinians and Israelis is a mark of I saw first-hand what most people saw on television. I met a child and In Gaza, I saw the most appalling devastation. I saw the UN compound, I said to all I met, on both sides: This must stop. I left the region more determined than ever to work toward a world No one sees this more clearly than your own Rabbi Schneier. He has You all know him as the founder and president of the Appeal for He knows first-hand that no one man or nation has all the answers. He So, let us be frank. We must recognize the limits of power and Tom Lantos was fond of saying that even the littlest actions, the As we remember the victims of the Holocaust, let us reaffirm our faith Thank you very much. —————– On January 23, 2010, before a full house at Park East Synagogue, the The remarks were: http://www.newyorkun.diplo.de/Vertretung… At the Park East Service this year, a further Honored Guest was Rabbi Ricardo Di Segni, the Chief Rabbi of Rome, who has been visited at his Synagogue by the Pope, also as part of this year’s Holocaust Remembrance. Also present were Ambassador Thomas Mayr-Harting of Austria, Ambassador Peter Wittig of Germany, Ambassador Gerard Araud of France, Ambassador Anastassis Mitsialis of Greece, Ambassador Marta Horvathne Fekzi of Hungary, H.E. Most Reverend Celestino Migliore the Permanent Representative of the Vatican, Ambassador Yukio Takasu of Japan, Ambassador Cesare Maria Ragaglini of Italy, Ambassador Mohamed Loulichki of Morocco, Ambassador Jim McLay of New Zealand, Ambassador Andrzey Towpik of Poland, Ambassador Juan Antonio Yanez-Barnuevo of Spain, Ambassador Rayko S. Raytchev of Bulgaria, Ambassador Kim Won-soo, from the UN Secretary General’s Office, and about further twenty top Diplomatic Representatives. But I must remark that from all the Islamic and African Countries only Morocco was present – and from the newly emerging States only Brazil and China were present. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on January 27th, 2010 http://www.menafn.com/qn_news_story_s.as…
### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on January 26th, 2010 THAT IS AMAZING – EVEN THOUGH IT IS CARNAVAL 2010 TIME IN PERNAMBUCO,
>> “AO RECIFE O QUE O RECIFE NÃO CONHECE” Serviço: —————– EXPOSIÇÃO CONTA A HISTÓRIA DA GUERRA CIVIL ESPANHOLA Serviço: —————- Carnaval 2010 – Baile Municipal Serviço: ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on January 8th, 2010 UNITAR Receives Grant in Support of C3D+ Project. 7 January 2009: The UN Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) has received a EUR 300,000 grant from the Austrian Development Agency to support one of its climate change projects. The “Capacity Development for Adaptation to Climate Change and GHG Mitigation” (C3D+) project is an 8 million Euro project that aims to improve the ability of developing countries to address climate change by developing adaptation measures and planning mitigation strategies. The project brings together Regional Centers of excellence in Africa, Asia, the Pacific and the Caribbean, to form a network that pools and shares expertise to develop tools and learning materials, and is expected to benefit at least 3000 persons mainly in developing countries. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on December 7th, 2009 Denmark has pumped 1.2 billion kroner ( $240 million) into hosting COP15, but the country will recoup a major part of this through increased tourism and trade – most of it obviously going to Copenhagen. The mayor is a former EU Commissioner for the Environment, so she is personally deeply involved. She will also host December 14-15 the Climate Summit for Mayors with 100 mayors in attendance. She says : “Half of the world’s population is now living in cities and the number is rapidly growing. Cities of the world are responsible for more than 75% of global CO2 emissions. Any solution to the climate crisis therefore, has to involve active participation from the cities. Her event is obviously part of the COP15 but outside the COP area of Bella Center. Copenhagen has set itself the ambitious target of becoming the world’s first carbon neutral capital by 2025. It will be known by its roof gardens. Grass will be growing on the roofs and instead of coal they will be burning wood, straw, and using also biogas. By 2015 the city will have reduced by 29% emissions as compared to today and reach carbon neutrality in 2025. Copenhagen is already rated today with Vienna as the two most livable places in the world. Copenhagen, looking at the Conference happening in their town, has renamed itself to Hopenhagen in light of the push the UN has created by the chant – SEAL THE DEAL. All was obviously planned with the belief in their hearts that there will be a deal by the time of the start of the Conference as per a UN driven success, and the city of Copenhagen set out to invoke, involve, and engage the entire population of the world in the climate debate. The city, rather then the State government, speaks for the people, so in a UN terminology they are an NGO as the UN recognizes only Sovereign Governments with title and responsibility of Government this as a course that turns easily into a blessing under various political regimes. — IT IS NOT JUST FOR THE HEADS OF STATE WHO CARRY ON ENORMOUS RESPONSIBILITY TO IMPROVE THE GLOBAL CLIMATE IN THE FUTURE; THE RESPONSIBILITY ALSO LIES WITH THE INDIVIDUAL PERSON AND THE INDIVIDUAL CITY. We must as individuals realize the goals of a greener world, and the city will then become a city of hope – this is Copenhagen as Hopenhagen. The organization within which Copenhagen is active is the ICLEI – the UN affiliate representing local governments that want to have an impact as link between Governments and their Peoples. HOPENHAGEN LIVE is the name of the activity that will take place in the open City Hall Square. It will involve mainly the people of the city that open up to the guests for abroad and the center piece is a big white transparent globe upon which are projected the weather conditions of the globe and registered the size of the numbers of people signing up to register their being in favor of a climate change accord. Monday December 7, at 6:30pm, there was the official opening of HOPENHAGEN LIVE. At a different location in town, at the Store Vega, Enghavevej 40, 1674 Kobehavn V, The Climate Action Network of NGOs from UN Member States Campaign On Energy for a changing World – “PLAY TO STOP: EUROPE FOR CLIMATE,” there was a celebration with The list of CC Ambassadors includes Magdalena Maleeva from Bulgaria who was also a speaker at the London Premiere of the activist movie “The Age of Stupid.” (By the way, the movie will be shown at Hopenhagen Square at City Hall on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 starting 7pm) The ClimateAction evening – run by the European CAN that parallels the Swedish Presidency of the EU, was introduced to the Press earlier in the day at the Radisson Royal hotel by Claus Sorensen of Denmark, President of the DG Communication, Brussels, and Anna David, the Campaign Ambassador for Denmark. The CAN Europe also distributed the material information for “The Copenhagen Express” the Communications links for EU delegation to COP15. We will note here their program for the 18th of December as this provides a view how the EU expects the meetings to unfold: “At the end of the morning of 18 December it is foreseen that the Copenhagen ‘agreed outcome’ will be adopted by the Heads of State and government in short plenary sessions of the COP and then the CMP. This will be followed after lunch by closing plenaries, and then the CMP at which formal decisions and conclusions will be adopted. The Copenhagen outcome is likely to comprise a package of these COP and CMP decisions and conclusions. The close of the final CMP plenary will mark the end of the Copenhagen conference.” For those that forgot – COP is the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, while CMP is the former MOP or the Conference of Members to the Kyoto Protocol – which is basically all the members of the COP minus the United States. We assume thus President Obama to be free at the time there are discussions and there is voting on the CMP time. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on November 30th, 2009 A Dear Friends from Elisium, This time of the year is a time to reflect on all the good things which happened and give thanks. For Elysium this past year has been a period of continued artistic growth. I am very happy that our programs reach an ever growing audience and touch the hearts of many people on both sides of the Atlantic. The dialogue that takes place among the artists involved in our musical, literary and theatrical offerings, and between the artists and the audience – both in New York and overseas – contributes to the vitality of trans-Atlantic friendship and strengthens the confidence and understanding between America and Europe. Many people have worked tirelessly to make sure that Elysium navigates through these financially challenging times: our artists, our board members, our volunteers, and our many loyal friends and supporters. I am deeply grateful for all the gifts we have received. From the bottom of my heart I say “Thank you very much!” I hope you had a very happy Thanksgiving and look forward to welcoming you soon to another of our performances. With best regards, Gregorij H. von Leitis ———————– We are currently in Germany presenting the program “We are the last, ask us, we know” – a reading from the essays, poems, and novels of the exiled German-Jewish writer Hans Sahl (1902 – 1993). The unjustly forgotten writer, journalist and dramatist Hans Sahl joined Elysium’s board of advisors in the 1980’s and remained on the board until his death. The first reading took place in Hamm on November 19, as part of the city’s Literary Fall Festival. Two more performances will be held in Munich: Wednesday, December 9 at 8.00 pm Thursday, December 10 at 7.00 pm ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on November 29th, 2009 Finally a second shoe comes of at the UN Department of Public Information that services the Ban Ki-moon UN Administration. After the replacement of the officer in charge of Media Accreditation, now also a new Spokesperson. November 30, 2009 UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is getting a new Spokesperson – a real professional – Martin Nesirky – that will hail from Vienna where he was not just spokesman for over three years at the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) but was also Head of Press and Public Information. Nesirky will replace Michele Montas of Haiti who served since the beginning of the term of Mr. Ban Ki-moon, January 1, 2007, till now, November 30, 2009, thus leaving one month ahead of the end of a three years contract. Ms. Montas is retiring from the UN. More recently Mr. Nesirky in his Spokesman capacity at OSCE was instrumental in navigating the Russia backed OSCE Chairmanship for Kazakhstan for 2010. At the UN he may find his personal talents helpful in creating a new persona for the UN Secretary-General whose popularity with parts of the UN have hit a low, at a time that his reelection for a second term will be put on the table. Ms. Montas whom he replaces had none of such credentials. Prior to her appointment, Montas headed the French unit of UN Radio. From 2003 to 2004, she served as the Spokesperson for UN General Assembly President Julian Robert Hunte, of Saint Lucia, soon after she fled to New York from Haiti. In Haiti, she and her husband were also radio journalists and activists. Her husband was killed in Haiti, and she escaped to New York. We can vouch that in her first several months in the job Mr. Ban Ki-moon set her up, she had no understanding or patience for subjects of climate change – not even when the subject was raised in connection to killings going on in Africa, or the dangers to Small Island Member States of the UN. Not even in matters of the Middle East – she seemed as a fish out of water and effectively harming positions that the SG might have been more forthcoming. In press conferences of the SG she allowed only questions that she thought he would be interested in while guarding him from such questions as climate change. The anemic answer was: “As you know, the SG has been encouraging all of the relevant bodies to deal with climate change and its effects across a variety of fields.At this stage, however, what the SG is concerned with is making sure that Member states and leaders at the highest level will come to Copenhagen to deal precisely with all of the challenges of climate change and seal a deal that can help resolve all the various problems that member States face.” That was quite a lame answer from the source of “Hopenhagen” and a clear show why finally the UN deserves a professional Spokesperson it was denied during the first three years of the Ban Ki-moon Administration of the UN. The Correspondent continued with his insistence for an answer: Final answer from the Associate Spokesperson: “It’s always up to the Security Council which matters it chooses to take up under rubric of peace and security issues.” ———————————– N.B. - to be fair to Michele Montas - ———————————- P.S. – On November 23, 2009 Martin Nesirky met the media correspondents to the UN and said: A couple of things I just wanted to mention. First of all, I’m really looking forward to working with all of you; getting to know you. This is a huge challenge, of course, and I’m very keen to try to get to know you so I can help you the best that I can. That’s the first thing. The second thing is that, needless to say, I do read what’s being written. And I think there are a couple of things I’d like to make absolutely clear and very straight at the beginning. My language skills: I speak German, I speak Russian, I speak English after a fashion, I speak a little bit of Korean and an even smaller amount of French. I realize that it’s very, very important to be able to speak French. I’m going to be doing as the Secretary-General has done, which is to take extra French classes to improve on that. And that’s really all I wanted to say on that matter. The other is that I really believe that coming from outside the UN has advantages and disadvantages. You will have to bear with me as I get to know the system that you, many of you, know far better than I probably will ever do. But I am very keen to work with you so that you can help me to help you to have the stories that you need to write. Also, it seems that the UN expects Mr. Nesirky to start his work at the UN on only December 7th, which is coincidentally the day the Copenhagen Conference opens officially, does it mean that he will be there, or it means that Marie Okabe will be there and he will be in New York? We shall see! ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on November 9th, 2009 On November 9, 1939 the shards of crystal from Vienna and Berlin fury, and the burning of the books, did away with Germanic culture. Eventually the American-Anglo-Saxon world won a war by using the oil of Texas, but then at Yalta, in 1945, sold to the Soviets half of Europe in exchange for Arab and Iranian oil. This caused the bad years to be continued by a cold war that replaced the active war, but still left a large part of humanity in bondage. On November 9, 1989, the shards of the Berlin Wall allowed an additional chunk of Europe, and with it other parts of humankind, to start on a new path of development. Now after 20 more years – November 9, 2009 – the Barcelona meeting ended without concluding results in the effort to disengage the World from its dependence on oil. A success in this area could have brought further closure to the economic part of the 20th century European catastrophe – but this is not yet the case. If we continue to be addicted to oil – such wars like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be unavoidable even though we understand now that for other reasons – for climate change reasons – we must save culture – just as we had to do after November 9, 1939 – and we realize now that we hoped falsely that it was beginning to be the case after November 9, 1989. Our world is still in a state of transformation, and as frequent statements from Tehran remind us, we are still far away from having extirpated the Hitler venom. This past Saturday I heard Austrian Ambassador to the UN, Dr. Thomas Mayr-Harting, speak before the New York Synagogue Congregation at its Sabbath Service led by Rabbi Marc Schneier whose father is a Holocaust survivor from Vienna, on the effects of November 9 and the need for healing and vigilance. Next Shabbath, The New York Synagogue is hosting Imam Shamsi Ali, the Spiritual Leader at the Islamic Cultural Center of New York who will be talking about “Abraham’s Children Around the Table.” ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on November 3rd, 2009 Is there any hope for the EU to be part of a G3 global leadership? The EU destroyers come from the inside from those that do not want to give up temporary powers – that is for all to see. ============================= EU presidency trio of next three rotating EU Presidents – Spain, Belgium, Hungary – lays claim to political power and raises new objections to a strong full time effective EU President as envisioned by the Lisbon treaty. A specially pathetic case in our opinion in this respect is Belgium. November 3, 2009 http://euobserver.com/9/28917/?rk=1 EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – Leaders of the countries next in line to take on the day-to-day running of the European Union have made it clear that they do not wish to be sidelined by any future EU president. Gathered in Brussels last week to present a common logo for 18 months of co-operation beginning in January, the prime ministers of Spain, Belgium and Hungary were keen to emphasize the importance of “institutional balance” – an oblique way of saying they do not wish to get elbowed out of the political picture by a powerful new president of the European Council, a post created by the almost-ratified Lisbon Treaty. “The future of Europe does not depend on one person …the future of Europe depends on institutions,” said Belgian leader Herman Van Rompuy. His Hungarian counterpart Gordon Bajnai said “more time” is needed to “decide the role of the president and his relation to the rotating president.” He also said that one of the three prerequisites for the future president should be that the person “is someone who is ready to live with the already existing institutions of Europe.” With the Lisbon Treaty now likely to come into place within the coming few months, focus has turned to the uncertainties contained in the document. One of these includes how the six-month rotating presidencies and the national leaders of the moment will rub along with the permanent president. While the president, who can hold office for up to five years, is supposed to drive forward the political agenda of the EU through the regular meetings of EU leaders, the rotating presidency will manage the daily policy-making including chairing monthly ministerial meetings in all areas, bar foreign policy. The set-up, with its undefined hierarchy, could lead to damaging turf wars. The problem of the proliferation of chiefs with potentially overlapping job descriptions under the Lisbon Treaty – it also introduces a beefed up foreign policy post – has practical implications too, such as who will take part in EU summits with third countries. EU attendance at these events is often a crowded affair, a problem the union’s new set of rules is supposed to fix. Who will be the first president of the European Council is still unclear, with member states unsure about whether they want a powerful global figure, or someone with a more administrative job description. The EU parliament will discuss the role of the new president on 11 November, while the appointment itself is expected to be decided at an extraordinary summit later this month. The type of person who gets the job is set to strongly influence how the EU will make a go of the new Lisbon Treaty system – a fact acknowledged by the Hungarian leader. Mr Bajnai said it was the three countries’ “noble task” to “prove it is a better solution.” Spain, which is likely to be the first country to operate a presidency under the Lisbon Treaty beginning on 1 January, will face the challenge of setting the terms for how successive countries manage the relationship between the national leader and the EU president. A still greater challenge to the system is likely to come when one of the most powerful EU countries, Britain, France or Germany hold the rotating presidency. But this is not foreseen until 2017. ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on October 29th, 2009
You can spend hours on the website looking at the 20,417 photos we’ve received from last weekend’s day of climate action, but if you’ve only got three minutes this short video will give you a good idea about what happened: I’ve been coordinating the translations for 350.org since the beginning, so my favorite part of the video is seeing the incredible diversity of people all over the world, speaking so many different languages–but all speaking with one voice. Everyone in the video is joyful, passionate, and fired up by the knowledge that they are not acting alone. They know, as you should, that there are millions around the world who are standing together for bold climate action. I think you’ll like the video as much as I do, so do take a couple of minutes to watch it now: http://www.350.org/oct24-vid But we don’t want you to think we’ve stopped working and spend all day watching videos. Two days ago we met with the chief of the climate change section of the United Nations, Janosz Pastor. We gave him a book of photos that we prepared, filled with stories and news clippings about what happened on October 24th, and information about the 350 target. The best news: he’s passing it on to UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon. And that’s a good way to remind all of you that the first task on our post October 24 to-do list is delivering photos of your actions to your political leaders–local, regional, and national, and international. Sign up here for to take part in a photo-delivery: http://www.350.org/deliverysignup We’re sorry to put you back to work so soon, but time is short till the big UN Climate Talks in Copenhagen this December. Between now and then, the next stop for 350.org is Barcelona, Spain (my home country!) in early November. Why Barcelona? It’s the location of the final UN Climate meeting before the crucial December talks. In Barcelona, members of the 350.org team will be meeting with UN delegates, delivering photos and videos, and making sure that our collective call to action makes a a real impact. Wouldn’t it be amazing if while UN delegates were receiving photos and videos of citizens all over the world calling for bold action, your local officials were feeling the same heat? Help make it happen: With your help, we will make every world leader know that we will accept nothing less than a fair, ambitious, and binding climate treaty that puts us back on the road to 350. Thanks for all you do, Teresa Niño for The 350.org Organizing Team You should join us on Facebook by becoming a fan of our page at facebook.com and follow us on twitter by visiting twitter.com To join our list (maybe a friend forwarded you this e-mail) visit www.350.org ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on October 27th, 2009
I thought you might be interested to know that George Soros is delivering a series of lectures in Budapest at Central European University starting yesterday, October 26th. In the lectures, Soros discusses his philosophical theories in general and specifically as they pertain to the economic crisis, regulatory reform, finance, politics, open society, and a host of other subjects. Monday, October 26 – General Theory of Reflexivity Tuesday, October 27 – Financial Markets Wednesday, October 28 – Open Society Thursday, October 29 – Capitalism versus Open Society Friday, October 30 – China and the Way Ahead. Videos and transcripts posted at www.ft.com each evening after the event. —————– Further: See : //search.ft.com/search?queryText=Soros&x=15&y=5&aje=true&dse=&dsz= George Soros has material for the public daily this week. His intent is to make us aware of the need not to ignore the need for financial reform – and there is no person better then him to tell us so. He did benefit from the Wall Street self serving rules and now wants the world to extricate itself from the situation that the rules are so that the actual result is a planned distribution of gifts to the Wall Street office holders – the State is to be blamed for having allowed this to happen. Soros to invest $50m in institute to re-think economics Transcript: Soros on the Institute of New Economic Thinking Do not ignore the need for financial reform Soros says Wall St’s ‘hidden gifts’ should not be used for bonuses Soros calls Wall St profits ‘gifts’ from state…of such companies is “justified”, George Soros, the fund manager, said in an interview…not the achievement of risk-takers,” Mr Soros said. “These are gifts, hidden gifts, from…resentment which I think is justified.”Mr Soros, who joins a transatlantic chorus calling… Oct 23 2009, By Chrystia Freeland in New York, FT.com site Transcript: George Soros interview…US managing editor, interviewed George Soros, the fund manager, about the state of the…interview.FT: Thank you for joining us, Mr Soros.GS: It’s a pleasure.FT: How do you judge…in this conversation, he might argue, MrSoros, that you’re talking your own book and… Oct 23 2009, FT.com site Soros to invest in clean energy Soros to invest $1bn in green technology
——— With the US Dollar now Hovering around $1.50 t0 the Euro, and since the beginning of 2009, the Brazilian Real having appreciated by 25.1%, the Australian Dollar by 22.2%, the New Zealand Dollar by 21.6%, the South African Rand by 19.3%, the Norway Krone by 19.0%,the Chilean Peso by 16.3%, the Uruguayan Peso by 16.0%, the Colombian Peso by 13.2%, the Indonesian Rupian by 13.0%, the Canada Dollar, the Sweden Krona, the UK pound all well above 10%, even the Czech Koruna at 8.8% and the Peruvian New Sol is at 7.9%, with the Euro and the remaining European currencies, including Russia, are in between 4-5%, what future is there for the US economy? Will it have to attempt to continue running to the bottom in order to compete at least against China and Japan, or will there be an era of listening to George? ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on October 22nd, 2009
ALDE group calls for EP debate on role of EU Council President As candidates names for the position of President of the European Council are circulating with increasing frequency in the media ahead of the EU summit meeting in Brussels at the end of the month, Liberals and Democrats are calling for a parliamentary debate to better define the role and responsibilities of the new post before attempting to fill it. This morning, Parliament’s Group leaders backed the Liberal and Democrat group proposal to include a debate on the matter at the next Brussels part session on 11-12 November. The Treaty of Lisbon, which is still awaiting the signature of the Czech President, is not specific on the job description of the European Council President which leaves an opportunity for the Parliament to give its own opinion on the subject. The ALDE group also believes Parliament should address how the Commission needs to be structured to take account of the new external representation roles of the Council President and High representative as well as issues of accountability to Parliament for the actions and expenditure of the future activities of the Union. Greening our economy, preserving our planet. ALDE aims to achieve a new, ### |
|
Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on October 12th, 2009 The only good media outlet left at the UN – THE INNER CITY PRESS – has news for us: The Ban Ki-moon mantra for Copenhagen is just plain water. Jeffrey Sachs, the UN Secretary’s Advisor acknowledged that Copenhagen will not produce an answer.
–
From an event that showed very little respect for what the UN was intended to be:
A “Footnote: also at the event, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s advisor Jeffrey Sachs spoke of climate change, and said that ‘we probably will not complete negotiations at Copenhagen.’ Inner City Press went down to the day’s noon briefing by the Spokesperson for the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and asked: Inner City Press: Jeffrey Sachs, speaking at this event, the Global Compact event, said that probably negotiations will not be completed before or at Copenhagen. So I wanted to know is he, is this the Secretariat’s view? Is the seal the deal…? Spokesperson Michele Montas: No, it’s Mr. Sachs’ view. Inner City Press: It’s his own personal view? Spokesperson Montas: Yes —————– Back upstairs at the event, one of Inner City Press’ table-mates mused that since Ban’s deputy envoy to Afghanistan got fired for disagreeing with his boss(es) about fraud in the Afghan election, why would another Ban advisor so casually disagree with Ban’s “seal the deal” mantra?” ———— On this last one we have the answer – in the Afghan case the UNSG had to retreat as the truth of the forged elections became so bright that it was blinding the deniers – now seemingly the upcoming UN staged Copenhagen disaster is doing the same. Talk at the UN is very cheap but days of reckoning do happen sometimes!
———————————– And from October 12, 2009 official UN News -
UN OFFICIAL SPOTLIGHTS GAP BETWEEN REALITY AND RHETORIC ON CLIMATE CHANGE NEGOTIATIONS. There is a large gap between the rhetoric of heads of State on commitments to reverse global warming and what their negotiators are putting on the table, a senior United Nations official said today in the wake of recent climate change talks in Bangkok, Thailand. The Bangkok negotiations took place shortly after the 22 September summit convened by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at UN Headquarters, attended by 101 heads of State and 163 country representatives. Last month’s summit, the largest ever on climate change, “signalled its desire to achieve an agreed outcome in Copenhagen,” Janos Pasztor, Director of Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s Climate Change Support Team, told reporters in New York. Mr. Pasztor also noted that during the 10-day talks in Bangkok, which wrapped up on Friday, headway was made on some of the elements of the climate change treaty, such as adaptation, technology transfer, capacity-building and deforestation. “Developing countries clearly demonstrated they are moving forward in a spirit of pragmatic cooperation,” ahead of the Copenhagen conference in December when world leaders are slated to finalize a deal on carbon emissions to take effect when the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012. The Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has found that to stave off the worst effects of climate change, industrialized countries must slash emissions by 25 to 40 per cent of 1990 levels by 2020 and global emissions must be halved by 2050. With only five more negotiating days left until Copenhagen, countries must maintain the positive momentum of the New York summit and “translate that into concrete proposals that can advance progress toward an agreement,” said Mr. Pasztor. The last round of negotiations ahead of the Copenhagen conference will be held Barcelona, Spain from 7 to 18 December. ( ?? ) That is after the meeting ?
### |


























