links about us archives search home
SustainabiliTankSustainabilitank menu graphic

Follow us on Twitter


Posted on on November 16th, 2013
by Pincas Jawetz (


Janet Yellen: Income Inequality Is ‘A Very Serious Problem.’

By Bryce Covert, ThinkProgress reported by Readers’ Supported News.

15 November 2013


t her Senate confirmation hearing on Thursday, Janet Yellen, the nominee to replace Ben Bernanke as chair of the Federal Reserve after he steps down from his current term, discussed the rising trend of income inequality and the threat it poses to the economy.

This is a very serious problem, it’s not a new problem, it’s a problem that really goes back to the 1980s, in which we have seen a huge rise in income inequality… For many, many years the middle and those below the middle [have been] actually losing absolutely. And frankly a disproportionate share of the gains, it’s not that we haven’t had pretty strong productivity growth for much of this time in the country, but a disproportionate share of those gains have gone to the top ten percent and even the top one percent. So this is an extremely difficult and to my mind very worrisome problem.

She noted that there are many causes for rising income inequality, pointing to technology, globalization, and the decline of unions. “The solutions involve a multitude of things, including education, maybe early childhood education, job training, other things,” she said. While the Federal Reserve can’t change all of those problems, she argued, what it can do is try to bring about a strong economic recovery that creates jobs and gives people more opportunities to rise up the ladder.

But she also slammed Congress for getting in the Fed’s way when it comes to bolstering the economy and creating growth that can lead to jobs, with austerity through budget cuts hurting the Fed’s monetary efforts to support the recovery.

Fiscal policy has been working at cross purposes to monetary policy. I certainly recognize the importance of the objective of putting the U.S. debt, deficit and debt, on a sustainable path… But some of the near-term reductions in spending that we have seen have certainly detracted from the momentum of the economy and from demand, making it harder for the fed to get the economy moving, making our task more difficult.

She argued that instead of slashing spending now, Congress could focus on medium-term deficit reduction without “subtracting from impetus that we need to keep a fragile recovery moving forward.”

Yellen is right that income inequality has been growing at an alarming rate. Since the 1970s, the richest 20 percent of Americans have seen income grow much faster than for the bottom 20 percent, and their incomes are now eight times higher than at the bottom. But things have accelerated in the years after the recession.

Over the past three years, the top earners saw income grow by 5 percent while everyone else saw it decline. The top 10 percent of Americans took half of the country’s income home last year, the largest amount on record.

Meanwhile, the bottom 60 percent of earners have seen a “lost decade” in wage growth, with compensation falling or stagnating. This inequality has many causes: the decline of unions, different tax treatment for investment income, and deregulating Wall Street among them.

And she’s also right that American austerity measures aren’t helping the economy grow.

Sequestration, the automatic budget cuts that went into effect in March, has hurt growth and gets worse next year.

Without those cuts, the budget outlook would look much better and the economy could add as much as 1.2 percent to GDP growth and 1.6 million jobs.


Comments :

– The RSN Team
+7 # AndreM5 2013-11-15 13:11

I have to confess that what she said is blatantly obvious fact, but it is more than I expected her to say in public, much less to Congress, where plain facts are disdained.   Wow.
+4 # 2013-11-15 22:14

AndreM5 is right on–it will be such a miracle if we can get such clarity back in gov’t. It is so refreshing that she spoke a challenge to truth and power publicly.
+3 # California Neal 2013-11-15 23:10

I agree with Andre & Raymond. I would add that what she’s saying–& what another Cal professor, Robert Reich, says all the time–is that the 90% or 99% need more money in their pockets to spend in order to lift the economy for everyone. This is the time for government hiring & project funding, & for raising taxes on the wealthy, which have dropped precipitously since 1980. And it’s not the time for sequestering, & other counter-productive & premature deficit reduction.
BUT! The following shows how sick this country is!
-5 # egbegb 2013-11-15 18:15

RSN will die because its title (Reader Supported News) belies its mission (progressive ideology without exception).
Hire a conservative and RSN will survive. Otherwise, y’all should be looking for jobs.
I am a 3 or 4 year subscriber.
Never contributed because no alternative views were published.
Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a comment for this article