links about us archives search home
SustainabiliTankSustainabilitank menu graphic
SustainabiliTank

 
 
Follow us on Twitter

 

Posted on Sustainabilitank.info on March 4th, 2012
by Pincas Jawetz (pj@sustainabilitank.info)

On Friday, Mr. Ban underlined the need for concerted action to end the crisis in Syria, lamenting that the international community has thus far failed in its responsibility to stop the bloodshed in.

“In fact, the actions – indeed, the inaction — of the international community seems to have encouraged the Syrian authorities in their brutal suppression of its citizens,” Mr. Ban said as he reported to the General Assembly on the implementation of its 16 February resolution on Syria.

That resolution strongly condemned the continued “widespread and systematic” human rights violations by the Syrian authorities and demanded that the Government immediately cease all violence and protect its people.

====================

FROM INNER CITY PRESS

At UN, As Syria Lambasts Ban, Talk of Russian Answer But No Speech, Egypt PR Has Conflict of Interest?

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 2 — Before the Syria speech of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Friday, March 1, in front of the General Assembly Hall Inner City Press asked entering Ambassadors for their predictions long and short term.

Many spoke of a Security Council resolution “floating” off the radar, on which “the Americans are waiting to hear back from the Russians after the weekend,” an insider told Inner City Press, referring to not only to the Russian elections but also to a National Security Council meeting there.

Others filled in blanks for Inner City Press in Kofi Annan’s schedule, beyond the bilaterals with Iran, the UK and China that Inner City Press staked out and filmed. Annan had lunch with three Arab Permanent Representatives — Morocco, Saudi Arabia and job-seeking Egypt — and the “Qatari charge d’affaires.”

UN Peacekeeping chief Ladsous “sat in but said nothing,” an attendee said.

When the GA speeches began the European Union, it turned out, did not speak, arguing that “it’s good that the Arabs be heard.” Saudi Arabia had inscribed itself earlier in the day, Egypt at the last minute.

Finally Iran’s Ambassador arrived. He commented to Inner City Press on the previous day’s article about his meeting with new envoy Kofi Annan, then went in and signed up to speak. His main point, he said, was that for Annan to have a change, provocative statements have to stop.

After Ban read out his speech, Syrian Ambassador Bashar Ja’afari delivered a lengthy rebuttal lambasting Ban. He began by professing friendship and respect for Ban, but quickly called him and his speech blurry, slanderous and “virulent.”

Ban sat there, with a pinched look on his face; his spokesman Martin Nesirky periodically came to the stakeout, where other than Inner City Press there was practically no media. Later a TV crew from Benin arrived and interviewed Ja’afari, in French.


Ja’afari in front of GA on March 2, no-fly vote not shown (c) MRLee

{SustainabiliTank.ino comment – mainly the only other journalist involved is Ronda Hauben of OhmyNews International and a founder of taz.de/blogs/netizenblog – that says something about the present general level of investigative journalism at the UN}

Saudi Arabia’s Permanent Representative said that history will judge those who case vetoes for Syria in the Security Council.

On his way in, Russia’s Permanent Representative Vitaly Churkin had told Inner City Press he had a strong speech ready, if needed. If so, he did not use it.

As he left, Inner City Press asked him about the Saudi statement that history would judge him. “History will judge everyone,” Churkin replied and left. China’s Deputy Permanent Representative had the same response, but said it was not coordinated.

Egypt’s Permanent Representative Maged Abdelaziz made a point that Syria had not objected to moves against Libya in the League of Arab States. Inner City Press asked him about it afterward, calling it interesting. “I hope you use it,” he replied.

But Ja’afari of Syria told Inner City Press it wasn’t true, that Syria had “made reservations” on a no-fly zone over Libya. He noted, as the Press has before, that Maged Abdelaziz is asking for a job from Ban’s UN Secretariat. Some would call it a conflict of interest.

Saudi Arabia invoked Rwanda, Srebrenica, Kosovo and Gaza. Ja’afari replied that it was insulting to compare Rwanda to “Baba Amr, a neighborhood we love.” He took invoked Gaza. Palestinian Observer Mansour was present but did not sign up to speak.

Afterward several Permanent Representatives marveled to Inner City Press that Ja’afari had gone so hard on Ban. One surmised it is because Kofi Annan is viewed as more of a mediator, and as “a larger figure,” as a Permanent Representative put it. Ban will be cast as the “puppet of the West, reading speeches written by them.”

One comparison inevitable at least from here: if Ban Ki-moon is so concerned about human rights and war crimeswhy has he said nothing about having on his Senior Advisory Group on Peacekeeping Operations the Sri Lankan General Shavendra Silva, whose 58th Division is depicted in Ban’s own Panel of Experts report as engaged in war crimes?

============
and from Jay Hauben, husband of Ronda Hauben, we received:

On Friday March 2 at a UN General Assembly meeting, Ban Ki-moon made a report of his opinions about the conflict in Syria. He was answered by Syria’s Permanent Representative at the UN Bashar al-Jaafari. A video of the whole 1 1/2 hour meeting can be seen at:

www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/03/99th-plenary-meeting-general-assembly.html

al-Jaafari’s answer begins at about 00:16:10 into the playing of the video.

Since it is rare in the mainstream press to hear the Syrian government position, you might find al-Jaafari’s comments valuable to hear.

For me the exchange between Ban Ki-moon and al-Jaafari raised the question who is supporting the UN Charter? Isn’t the supplying of arms by a foreign power to an armed opposition a violation of the norm of international relations? It reminds me of the US war against Nicaragua. The US armed the Contras and mined the harbor of Managua. The International Court of Justice (ICJ the juridical branch of the UN) held that the U.S. had violated international law by supporting the Contras in their rebellion against the Nicaraguan government and by mining Nicaragua’s harbor.

I will paste below, a report on al-Jaafari’s comments which appeared on the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) website at:

www.sana.sy/eng/22/2012/03/03/403812.htm

Ronda is working on an article which will cover some of the UN’s plan to send former Secretary General Kofi Annan to mediate the conflict. I will send it out when she has posted it.



Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a comment for this article

###