THAT IS AMAZING:

On a Washington Post internet page:

http://views.washingtonpost.com/climate-change/2009/11/with_the_real_possibility_of_no_agreement_in_copenhagen_whos_to_blame/all.html?hpid=smartliving

is seemingly paid for by Shell Oil Company -
 http://www.shell.com/home/content/respon…

——

The editor of The Washington Post Asks on  a PLANET PANEL page THE QUESTION:

With the possibility of no global agreement, who’s to blame?

It now appears that this year’s Copenhagen climate conference will not produce a binding global pact to reduce emissions, but rather a political agreement on certain key elements, with hopes for a deal in 2010. Who’s to blame for this, and what sort of key questions are likely to get resolved in Copenhagen? To what extent does it represent a setback for the global push to combat climate change?   * * * POSTED BY WASHINGTON POST EDITOR ON NOVEMBER 16, 2009

——

WE FIND THIS VERY INTERESTING BECAUSE OF THE NGO SUSTAINABILITY EVENT WITH SHELL OIL AT THE UN UNDER THE COVER OF THE PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE TO THE UN FROM KAZAKHSTAN – THAT WE POSTED A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO.

SO DOES THIS MEAN THAT SHELL OIL IS NOW REPLACING EXXON AS THE FACE OF BIG OIL IN THE CLIMATE DEBATE? THAT IS OBVIOUSLY A NICER FACE – BUT STILL COVERED WITH GOOEY OIL. WWW.SUSTAINABILITANK.INFO WANTS TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK?

Having said that we want nevertheless to add that the material in the postings from the individuals on that Washington Post page are quite interesting and I recommend you read with the help of the link posted above. On the other hand, for fairness, I also attach the take of Matthew Lee from the situation at the UN.

——

Inner City Press — Investigative Reporting From the Inner City to Wall Street to the United Nations

At UN, Yvo de Boer and Africa’s Secret Climate Number, of Indian Black Carbon and Shell Games in the Niger Delta

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, November 20 — With the UN simultaneous shrinking hopes for the Copenhagen climate change meeting and telling the Press not to cover the diminshed expectations, its top negotiator Yvo de Boer on November 19 effectively set $10 billion as the ceiling for transfers to the developing world.

There is only one problem: the African Union alone is said to be looking for $67 billion annually, with a threat to walk out of Copenhagen is less is offered. Inner City Press asked de Boer is he knew of the African Union number, and if even a feigned successful conference would be possible in the Africans walked out.

De Boer said that as a UN official, he believes in bringing people together, and that any walk out would be bad. He then argued that $10 billion was only a start, not a ceiling at all. But by stating the number as an indicia of success, he effectively did that.

Inner City Press asked de Boer to comment on India’s environment minister Ramesh’s comment that not only will India not make binding commitments in Copenhagen on greenhouse gas emissions, it will not discuss black coal emissions at all: “Copenhagen meeting is for negotiations for cuts in GHG emission and not for black carbon emission. We would resist any move for bringing in black carbon emission for discussions. Scientific link between black carbon emission and global warming and melting of glaciers is still being studied.”

At first de Boer said he hadn’t seen the comment and so couldn’t response. Then Inner City Press e-mailed it to him.Hours later, to his credit, de Boer responded:

Subj: Here’s the Minister Ramesh / black carbon emissions quote I’ve asked about
From: Yvo de Boer [at] unfccc.int
To: Inner City Press
Sent: 11/19/2009 8:24:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

The Minister correctly states that the climate negotiations do not address black carbon as it is not a greenhouse gas. However efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can also significantly lower emissions of black carbon

We’ll see. Meanwhile, given the environment, some were surprised on November 18 to find Shell’s Elizabeth Cheney in a UN conference room blithely praising her company’s record.

Inner City Press asked about Shell’s activities for example in Nigeria, specifically in the Niger Delta where Shell was accused for playing a role in the death of activist Ken Saro Wiwa, and is currently being sued before the ECOWAS court for pollution and human rights violations.

Ms. Cheney said Shell is “suffering the activities of criminal and terrorists [who] blow things up.” She said, “We are not the government of Nigeria… sometimes we shut production and move out of area.”

But what about pressuring those who oppose the oil drilling or distribution of revenue? “That’s more detailed than we need to get into today,” Ms. Cheney said. Afterwards she promised to put Inner City Press in touch with both “communications and… the leadership part of the business, there’s more transparency there.” If you say so…