<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barron&#8217;s Magazine Editorial Likes a Real CAP &amp;TRADE Program but sees in the &#8220;Big ENERGY PRODUCERS &amp; CONSUMERS&#8221; members of the US CLIMATE ACTION PARTNERSHIP who will get 85% of the polluting Permits for free &#8211; the undoing of what could have been a book-case. Higher energy costs are the start and truely tradable permits, without give-aways, could have pushed for the most profitable use of energy.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sustainabilitank.info/2009/07/03/barrons-magazine-editorial-likes-a-real-cap-trade-program-but-sees-in-the-big-energy-producers-consumers-members-of-the-us-climate-action-partnership-who-will-get-85-of-the-polluting-permits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sustainabilitank.info/2009/07/03/barrons-magazine-editorial-likes-a-real-cap-trade-program-but-sees-in-the-big-energy-producers-consumers-members-of-the-us-climate-action-partnership-who-will-get-85-of-the-polluting-permits/</link>
	<description>Sustainable Development Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>
